<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to find out how the form of examination existence in a judicial institution and whether the existence of examination in a judicial institution can control the performance of judges in making a product such as a decision maximally or not, so that it can reduce judges' errors in making decisions in court. This study is alibrary research that uses data in the form of books, laws, articles, journals, several cases that often occur and other literature related to the title, while the technique and data collection is by collecting various ideas, theories and concepts from various literature that emphasizes the comparison process between arguments, articles or other laws. The approach method used in this study is the statute approach, conceptual approach, case approach and historical approach or history. The research findings indicate that the existence of examinations within a judicial institution is purely internal and serves as an oversight instrument by the Supreme Court (MA) over its subordinate judges. The formal basis for this practice began with the issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 1 of 1967. This SEMA requires the heads of first-instance and appellate courts to examine judges' decisions to assess their competence and thoroughness. However, when viewed over time until today, despite the existence of the Judicial Commission (KY), the function of internal examinations has tended to stagnate or become merely an administrative formality]]>
Copyrights © 2026
