<![CDATA[The integration of guilty pleas within the Indonesian criminal justice system creates a normative clash between procedural efficiency and economic discrimination. This sociolegal study investigated how financial restitution mandates and pretrial detention pressures transform legal simplifications into commodified justice. The research demonstrates that making leniency contingent upon immediate restitution marginalizes vulnerable defendants. Furthermore, the absence of comprehensive evidentiary discovery systematically deconstructs defendant autonomy, reducing legal counsel to mere administrative validators. Guilty pleas are not inherently commercialized, but they become coercive transactions when institutional managerial targets supersede fundamental trial rights. To prevent this systemic exploitation, this article constructs an institutional safeguard model prioritizing transparent negotiation alongside substantive inquisitorial oversight. This novel framework offers a crucial architectural blueprint for transitional criminal procedure reforms across emerging civil jurisdictions globally, ensuring that administrative acceleration never compromises equal protection under the established rule of modern universal justice systems and fundamental international human rights legal standards.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
