Ahmad Burhanuddin
Raden Intan State Islamic University of Lampung, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Commercialization of Justice in Guilty Pleas: Indonesia Criminal Procedure Code 2025 Ahmad Burhanuddin; Syeh Sarip Hadaiyatullah
Legtimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Legitimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jolil.v2i2.2726

Abstract

The integration of guilty pleas within the Indonesian criminal justice system creates a normative clash between procedural efficiency and economic discrimination. This sociolegal study investigated how financial restitution mandates and pretrial detention pressures transform legal simplifications into commodified justice. The research demonstrates that making leniency contingent upon immediate restitution marginalizes vulnerable defendants. Furthermore, the absence of comprehensive evidentiary discovery systematically deconstructs defendant autonomy, reducing legal counsel to mere administrative validators. Guilty pleas are not inherently commercialized, but they become coercive transactions when institutional managerial targets supersede fundamental trial rights. To prevent this systemic exploitation, this article constructs an institutional safeguard model prioritizing transparent negotiation alongside substantive inquisitorial oversight. This novel framework offers a crucial architectural blueprint for transitional criminal procedure reforms across emerging civil jurisdictions globally, ensuring that administrative acceleration never compromises equal protection under the established rule of modern universal justice systems and fundamental international human rights legal standards.
The Commercialization of Justice in Guilty Pleas: Indonesia Criminal Procedure Code 2025 Ahmad Burhanuddin; Syeh Sarip Hadaiyatullah
Legtimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Legitimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jolil.v2i2.2726

Abstract

The integration of guilty pleas within the Indonesian criminal justice system creates a normative clash between procedural efficiency and economic discrimination. This sociolegal study investigated how financial restitution mandates and pretrial detention pressures transform legal simplifications into commodified justice. The research demonstrates that making leniency contingent upon immediate restitution marginalizes vulnerable defendants. Furthermore, the absence of comprehensive evidentiary discovery systematically deconstructs defendant autonomy, reducing legal counsel to mere administrative validators. Guilty pleas are not inherently commercialized, but they become coercive transactions when institutional managerial targets supersede fundamental trial rights. To prevent this systemic exploitation, this article constructs an institutional safeguard model prioritizing transparent negotiation alongside substantive inquisitorial oversight. This novel framework offers a crucial architectural blueprint for transitional criminal procedure reforms across emerging civil jurisdictions globally, ensuring that administrative acceleration never compromises equal protection under the established rule of modern universal justice systems and fundamental international human rights legal standards.