<![CDATA[The implementation of execution (hadhanah) in Indonesia still faces unclear norms, especially because children cannot be treated as objects of execution like objects as stated in Article 1033 Rv (Reglemen op de Rechtsvordering), one of which is namely in the Decision Supreme Court Number: 1026 K/Ag/2023. Formulation problems in research This namely: First, how urgency implementation dwangsom (money force) in constraint implementation execution decision right foster care child (hadhanah) in Decision Supreme Court Number: 1026 K/Ag/2023 and second, how the judge's authority in set dwangsom (money force) in the case right foster care child (hadlanah) according to law positive in Indonesia. Goal study This For urgency implementation dwangsom (money force) in constraint implementation execution decision right foster care child (hadhanah) in Decision Supreme Court Number: 1026 K/Ag/2023 and the authority of judges in set dwangsom (money force) in the case right foster care child (hadlanah) according to law positive in Indonesia. Method research used is study juridical normative. Research results show that the application of dwangsom in the Supreme Court Decision Number: 1026 K/Ag/2023 is valid and important to be implemented as an effort to guarantee the implementation of child custody (hadhanah) execution. This application is in line with Article 606 a and 606 Rv (Reglement op de burgerlijke rechtvordering), Article 259 paragraph (1) RBg Results of the National Working Meeting (RAKERNAS) of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in Manado in 2012. In addition, based on the Supreme Court Decision Number: 556/K/SIP/1971 dated January 8, 1972, and the Supreme Court Number: 291/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Klk, the Judge is allowed to decide beyond the petitum as long as it is for the sake of justice, so that it does not violate the principle of ultra petita. This application is also in line with the Islamic fiqh principle of Dar'ul Mafasid Muqoddamun 'Al-Jarbil Masalih.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
