<![CDATA[This study aims to describe the implementation of risk management in the fixed asset management of the Bogor Regency Government; analyze the strengths and weaknesses of this implementation; analyze the effectiveness of risk mitigation; analyze the contribution of existing regulations regarding fixed asset management to the mitigation efforts undertaken; develop a risk mitigation model for fixed asset management; and formulate an implementation strategy for fixed asset management risk management. The study employs a qualitative approach using triangulation techniques, with data analysis involving reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. It utilizes data from the 2021–2024 period, obtained through interviews, questionnaires , observations, and literature reviews at the research site, the Bogor Regency Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency (BPKAD). The research identifies 50 risk variables, 13 external risk cause variables, 50 internal risk cause variables, 81 impact variables, and 83 risk mitigation variables. Based on SNI ISO 31000:2018, the study identifies 5 strength variables and 6 weakness variables. Reveals that 74.70% of mitigation efforts are effective against internal risk causes, and 38.55% are effective in enhancing budget efficiency and reducing state financial losses. Ministry of Home Affairs regulations concerning fixed asset management contributed to 43.37% of risk mitigation efforts. The study also produces a three-layer risk mitigation model for fixed asset management. Relevant implementation strategies include regulatory harmonization, the provision of an integrated information system, commitment enhancement, risk management competency development, the simplification of risk management administration and reporting, and the strengthening of network cooperation.]]>
Copyrights © 2026
