The constitutional concept of ‘state control’ mandates that drinking water be provided by the State. However, the State’s limited capacity has created a service gap filled by a plurality of non-state actors, including communities and private companies. Due to restrictive laws, these actors are forced to operate through regulatory loopholes—such as ‘own-use’ schemes, partnership models, and community-based systems. This situation results in normative incoherence, weak state oversight, and undermines consumer protection. This paper argues that the effective solution is not to prohibit non-state participation but to establish a legal framework that explicitly recognizes and governs this plurality of providers, thereby ensuring legal certainty and upholding the universal right to water
Copyrights © 2025