The agreement that has been made and agreed upon by the parties applies as law and is binding on the parties who made it. Agreement made must be strictly implemented. Otherwise, it will be categorized as an act of default which gives the injured party the right to claim compensation. However, in the implementation of the Cooperation Agreement for the Utilization of State Property in the TNI AD environment, there are violations of the law committed by the parties, because in carrying out an agreement it must be done in good faith. By using normative juridical research methods. This study found that: 1. The unilateral cancellation of the agreement, there was a violation of obligations carried out by Kodam Jaya as a party in the implementation of the agreement because it contained arbitrariness, or used its dominant position to take advantage of a weak position (adverse circumstances) at PT. CAA, then this is included in an act against the law, because the arbitrariness is outside of the implementation of the obligations stipulated in the agreement, so it is not a breach of contract, but rather violates its legal obligation to always have good intentions in the agreement. 2. The risk that occurs if an agreement made by both parties is canceled unilaterally, then the one who cancels unilaterally, Kodam Jaya must compensate for material losses suffered by the aggrieved party, namely PT. CAA Rp. 40.313.050.000,- (forty billion three hundred thirteen million fifty thousand rupiah).
Copyrights © 2022