This article argues that Indonesia’s fuel security problem is not primarily caused by a lack of policy information, but by the fragmented institutionalisation of economic intelligence. Although monitoring, reporting, regulatory controls, and subsidy instruments are in place, they are not yet integrated into a coherent intelligence-to-policy architecture capable of addressing territorial accessibility and long-term resilience. The research approach is qualitative, using secondary data analysis of policy documents, institutional reports, official publications, and academic publications. The findings indicated that economic intelligence practices have been institutionalised through assessment, monitoring, and oversight, yet institutional gaps and a lack of coordination persist. While the regulatory capacity is fairly good, it has not been fully utilised to address regional barriers and structural resilience. Also, anticipatory governance is not completely integrated. Overall, governance is more effective at ensuring availability and affordability than at ensuring accessibility and resilience.
Copyrights © 2026