Peralihan Kewenangan Badan Arbitrase Pasar Modal Indonesia Menjadi Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan Dikaitkan dengan Keabsahan Klausula Arbitrase

Luqyana Shafira Alfarhani (mahasiswa)
Richard C. Adam (Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta)

SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum

This article examines whether an arbitration clause naming the Indonesian Capital Market Arbitration Board (BAPMI) remained enforceable after its sectoral dispute-resolution function moved to the Financial Services Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution (LAPS SJK). It analyses Supreme Court Decision No. 1218 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2024 using statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The judgment grants the appeals and restores the LAPS SJK award; its final reasoning is concise, while the published decision reproduces appellants' arguments invoking Article 47(2) of OJK Regulation No. 61/POJK.07/2020, Article 245 of Law No. 4 of 2023, and Article 70 of Law No. 30 of 1999. This article's contribution is a staged test of consent, transitional scope, dispute scope, and procedural safeguards. It argues that a transition rule may preserve a valid agreement only within its legal scope; it cannot create consent absent from the original contract. The date LAPS SJK received the application could not be verified from the published judgment.