Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.961
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Richard C. Adam
Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta
Arts Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Kedudukan Hukum Objek Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Dalam Kepailitan Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Hasya Ramania; Richard C. Adam
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4418

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal status of land objects subject to a Preliminary Sale and Purchase Agreement (Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli/PPJB) when a developer is declared bankrupt, from the perspective of legal certainty, with Supreme Court Decision Number 395 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024 as the case study. This study employs a normative juridical method through statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The results demonstrate that a PPJB object that has been fully paid for, possessed by the buyer, and acquired in good faith should not automatically be included in the bankruptcy estate. However, such protection does not eliminate the requirement for a Deed of Sale and Purchase (Akta Jual Beli/AJB) and land registration as the formal mechanisms for transferring land rights. The differing decisions at the trial and cassation levels indicate inconsistent application of legal norms, while Judicial Review Decision Number 62 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024 upheld the cassation outcome, and Decision Number 24 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2025 reflects the subsequent development of protection for good-faith buyers. Therefore, stronger legal norms are required concerning the criteria for excluding PPJB objects from the bankruptcy estate, substantive examination by bankruptcy administrators, and mechanisms for completing the AJB and land registration while preserving the rights of secured creditors holding valid security interests. Keywords : PPJB; bankruptcy; good-faith buyer; legal certainty; bankruptcy estate.
Karakteristik Penguatan Norma Hukum Pengembalian Keuntungan Tidak Sah dan Dana Kompensasi Kerugian Investor Pasar Modal Berdasarkan Hukum Pasar Modal Agatha Darria; Richard C. Adam
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4421

Abstract

The rapid growth of Indonesia’s capital market, with investors increasing from 3.68 million in 2020 to more than 30 million in 2026, has been accompanied by risks such as stock price manipulation through “pump-and-dump” or “saham gorengan” schemes. Retail investors are particularly vulnerable due to limited access to information. To facilitate investor loss recovery, the Financial Services Authority (OJK) issued Regulation Number 65/POJK.04/2020 on Disgorgement and Disgorgement Funds, adopting the disgorgement concept from the United States. This study examines the strength of the legal framework governing unlawful gain recovery and the need to strengthen its regulation. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by theories of legal certainty, utility, and protection, the study finds that the mechanism remains discretionary because OJK regulations use the term “authorized,” creating uncertainty regarding its application. Regulatory developments indicate a shift toward mandatory application when OJK pursues administrative enforcement. Strengthening technical regulations and procedural mechanisms is therefore necessary to improve recovery of retail investors’ losses.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Penyanyi dan Penyelenggara Pertunjukan atas Penggunaan Komersial Lagu Ciptaan Pihak Ketiga Aldon Lim; Richard C. Adam
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4424

Abstract

Commercial performances of songs created by third parties involve at least the creator, the singer or performer, and the event organizer. The legal problem concerns which party must bear the responsibility for authorization and royalty payment when a third-party song is performed for commercial purposes. This study examines the normative position of the parties through a normative juridical method using statute, conceptual, and case approaches, with particular attention to Supreme Court Decision Number 825 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2025. The analysis shows that the Supreme Court decision should not be read as a final adjudication on the substantive allocation of liability because the dispute was affected by a defect in the composition of the parties. The current legal position is further clarified by Constitutional Court Decision Number 28/PUU-XXIII/2025, which conditionally interprets Article 23 paragraph (5) of the Copyright Law so that the term “Every Person” includes commercial performance organizers. Regulation of the Minister of Law Number 27 of 2025 also strengthens the royalty management framework. The singer retains related rights as a performer, but performance alone does not make the singer the default royalty payer. Legal certainty therefore requires clearer allocation of duties, pre-event royalty compliance, and standardized contractual clauses.
NORMA HUKUM ITIKAD BAIK SEBAGAI BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEMEGANG MEREK TERDAFTAR DALAM SENGKETA MEREK TERHADAP PERSAMAAN PADA POKOKNYA Elissa Virginia; Richard C. Adam
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4467

Abstract

Trademark disputes involving similarity in principle may harm registered trademark holders, particularly when a trademark is registered by imitating or exploiting the reputation of another party’s trademark. This study aims to analyze the application of the good faith principle in trademark cancellation based on similarity in principle and to examine efforts to strengthen the good faith principle in providing legal protection for registered trademark holders in Indonesia. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively, focusing on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, as well as the principles of good faith and similarity in principle. The results indicate that the good faith principle plays an important role in assessing the validity of trademark registration, particularly where similarity in principle is accompanied by indications of imitation or exploitation of another trademark’s reputation. Strengthening this principle may be achieved through more thorough substantive examination, assessment of dominant elements and the overall impression of trademarks, identification of indications of imitation, and optimization of the trademark cancellation mechanism. Therefore, consistent application of the good faith principle can strengthen legal certainty and effective protection for registered trademark holders. Keywords: Good Faith; Trademark; Legal Protection; Registered Trademark Holder; Similarity In Principle.
Norma Hukum Hak Suara Kreditor Konkuren dalam Perkara Kepailitan dalam Rangka Rencana Perdamaian Revina; Richard C. Adam
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4482

Abstract

Creditor voting in bankruptcy compositions raises proportionality concerns because claims up to IDR 10,000,000 receive one formal voting unit, while larger claims obtain additional units based on monetary increments and rounding. This article examines voting rules for unsecured creditors and proposes measures to strengthen preventive legal protection. It employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings distinguish the voting-unit formula under Article 87(3) and Government Regulation No. 10 of 2005 from the special composition threshold under Article 151. Article 151 requires both approval by more than half of eligible unsecured creditors attending the meeting and approval representing at least two-thirds of qualifying claims present. Article 152 permits a second ballot under a separate trigger, while Article 153 preserves the result against subsequent changes in creditor or claim numbers. Thus, Article 151 does not replace the creditor-count requirement with weighted voting units. The proposed improvements include standardized creditor counting, reliable claim verification, and separate reporting of creditor numbers, voting units, and claim values. The monetary threshold under Government Regulation No. 10 of 2005 should be reviewed prospectively without altering the statutory acceptance threshold. Keywords : Voting Rights; Unsecured Creditors; Bankruptcy; Composition Plan; Preventive Legal Protection.
Peralihan Kewenangan Badan Arbitrase Pasar Modal Indonesia Menjadi Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan Dikaitkan dengan Keabsahan Klausula Arbitrase Luqyana Shafira Alfarhani; Richard C. Adam
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4483

Abstract

This article examines whether an arbitration clause naming the Indonesian Capital Market Arbitration Board (BAPMI) remained enforceable after its sectoral dispute-resolution function moved to the Financial Services Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution (LAPS SJK). It analyses Supreme Court Decision No. 1218 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2024 using statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The judgment grants the appeals and restores the LAPS SJK award; its final reasoning is concise, while the published decision reproduces appellants' arguments invoking Article 47(2) of OJK Regulation No. 61/POJK.07/2020, Article 245 of Law No. 4 of 2023, and Article 70 of Law No. 30 of 1999. This article's contribution is a staged test of consent, transitional scope, dispute scope, and procedural safeguards. It argues that a transition rule may preserve a valid agreement only within its legal scope; it cannot create consent absent from the original contract. The date LAPS SJK received the application could not be verified from the published judgment.
Co-Authors Agatha Darria Aldon Lim Elissa Virginia Hasya Ramania Luqyana Shafira Alfarhani Revina