cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Universa Medicina
Published by Universitas Trisakti
ISSN : 19073062     EISSN : 24072230     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health, Science,
Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health
Universa Medicina (univ.med) is a four-monthly medical journal that publishes new research findings on a wide variety of topics of importance to biomedical science and clinical practice. Universa Medicina Online contains both the current issue and an online archive that can be accessed through browsing, advanced searching, or collections by disease or topic
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 41 No. 3 (2022)" : 12 Documents clear
Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine hesitancy and vaccine literacy among unvaccinated young adults: Gulay YILMAZEL; Emre KELES; Ayse CALMAZ; Burcu DAYSAL GULER
Universa Medicina Vol. 41 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18051/UnivMed.2022.v41.228-235

Abstract

BackgroundHerd immunity is necessary to control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Unfortunately, attaining herd immunity is a significant challenge for current healthcare systems worldwide, and the prevalence of hesitancy toward COVID-19 remains high. The aim of this study was to determine pandemic vaccine hesitancy, attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccine and COVID-19 vaccine literacy level in vaccination period among unvaccinated young adults. MethodsThis cross-sectional study was carried out in the province of Çorum in Turkey. Unvaccinated young adults (n=860) between the ages of 18-30 studying medicine and non-medical sciences of a university were included in the study. Socio-demographic form, and the scales on Pandemic Vaccine Hesitancy, Attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccine, COVID-19 vaccine literacy were used to collect the research data. The data were analyzed using percentages, median values, regression analysis. Results The study was completed with 860 participants. In the group, 73.8% were 18-24 years 67.7% were women and 68.0% were infected with the virus. The median scores from the pandemic vaccine hesitancy scale, vaccine literacy and vaccine attitudes were 33, 27 and 30 respectively. Use of social media in daily, vaccine literacy and COVID-19 vaccine attitude were effective factors on pandemic vaccine hesitancy (p<0.05). Negative attitude to vaccines was the most influenced risk factor of vaccine hesitancy (Beta = 0.248). ConclusionPandemic vaccine hesitancy is a phenomenon that coincides with low vaccine literacy and negative attitudes towards vaccines. COVID-19 vaccination information campaigns should promote group strategies, focusing on emphasising the safety of the vaccine and offer reassurance.
Knowledge levels of fetal rights in Turkish pediatric nurses Selen OZAKAR AKCA; Ahu Pınar TURAN; Dilek KALKAN YALCIN
Universa Medicina Vol. 41 No. 3 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18051/UnivMed.2022.v41.219-227

Abstract

BACKGROUNDFetal rights are violated due to acts such as negligence, ignorance, false beliefs and substance addiction. Pediatric nurses, as defenders of the fetus, should inform pregnant women and the family about the rights of the fetus and assist the family in the decision-making process. This study aims to determine the knowledge levels of pediatric nurses on fetal rights. METHODSThis cross-sectional study involved 121 nurses working in the pediatric clinic of a training and research hospital. Data about characteristics of pediatric nurses and knowledge levels about fetal rights were collected. Statistical analyses were made with SPSS package program. Mann Whitney U test and Kruskal Wallis test was used to analyse the data. RESULTSIn this study, it was found that 76.9% of the pediatric nurses participating in the study did not have prior knowledge about fetal rights. There was a statistically significant difference between the participants’ mean scores of knowledge levels about fetal rights and their age, educational status, status of prior knowledge about fetal rights and where this knowledge was gained (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONAs a result, it was found that most of the pediatric nurses did not have prior knowledge about fetal rights, and that their knowledge about fetal rights was lacking. Considering that pediatric nurses, as the defenders of the fetus, have a duty to inform the family about fetal rights, it is recommended to plan trainings on fetal rights for pediatric nurses.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 45 No. 1 (2026): Aheaf Of Print Vol. 44 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 44 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 44 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 43 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 43 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 43 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 42 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 42 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 42 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 41 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 41 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 41 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 40 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 40 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 40 No. 1 (2021) Vol 39, No 3 (2020) Vol. 39 No. 3 (2020) Vol. 39 No. 2 (2020) Vol 39, No 2 (2020) Vol. 39 No. 1 (2020) Vol 39, No 1 (2020) Vol 38, No 3 (2019) Vol 38, No 2 (2019) Vol 38, No 2 (2019) Vol 38, No 1 (2019) Vol 38, No 1 (2019) Vol 37, No 3 (2018) Vol 37, No 3 (2018) Vol 37, No 2 (2018) Vol. 37 No. 2 (2018) Vol 37, No 2 (2018) Vol 37, No 1 (2018) Vol 37, No 1 (2018) Vol 36, No 3 (2017) Vol. 36 No. 3 (2017) Vol 36, No 3 (2017) Vol 36, No 2 (2017) Vol 36, No 2 (2017) Vol 36, No 1 (2017) Vol 36, No 1 (2017) Vol 35, No 3 (2016) Vol 35, No 3 (2016) Vol 35, No 2 (2016) Vol 35, No 2 (2016) Vol 35, No 1 (2016) Vol. 35 No. 1 (2016) Vol 35, No 1 (2016) Vol 34, No 3 (2015) Vol 34, No 3 (2015) Vol. 34 No. 2 (2015) Vol. 34 No. 1 (2015) Vol. 33 No. 3 (2014) Vol. 33 No. 2 (2014) Vol. 33 No. 1 (2014) Vol. 32 No. 3 (2013) Vol. 32 No. 2 (2013) Vol. 32 No. 1 (2013) Vol. 31 No. 3 (2012) Vol. 31 No. 2 (2012) Vol 31, No 1 (2012) Vol. 31 No. 1 (2012) Vol 31, No 1 (2012) Vol 30, No 3 (2011) Vol 30, No 3 (2011) Vol 30, No 2 (2011) Vol 30, No 2 (2011) Vol 30, No 1 (2011) Vol 30, No 1 (2011) Vol 29, No 3 (2010) Vol 29, No 3 (2010) Vol 29, No 2 (2010) Vol 29, No 2 (2010) Vol 29, No 1 (2010) Vol 29, No 1 (2010) Vol 28, No 3 (2009) Vol 28, No 3 (2009) Vol 28, No 2 (2009) Vol 28, No 2 (2009) Vol 28, No 1 (2009) Vol 28, No 1 (2009) Vol 27, No 4 (2008) Vol 27, No 4 (2008) Vol 27, No 3 (2008) Vol 27, No 3 (2008) Vol 27, No 2 (2008) Vol 27, No 2 (2008) Vol 27, No 1 (2008) Vol 27, No 1 (2008) Vol 26, No 4 (2007) Vol 26, No 4 (2007) Vol 26, No 3 (2007) Vol 26, No 3 (2007) Vol 26, No 2 (2007) Vol 26, No 2 (2007) Vol 26, No 1 (2007) Vol 26, No 1 (2007) More Issue