cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Forum Arkeologi
Published by Balai Arkeologi Bali
ISSN : 08543232     EISSN : 25276832     DOI : -
Core Subject : Humanities, Art,
Forum Arkeologi Journal as a media for disseminating various information related to culture in the past, based on the results of archaeological research and cultural scientific studies. Forum Arkeologi Journal is a scientific journal published by Balai Arkeologi Bali since 1988. Forum Arkeologi Journal published twice a year. Each article published in Forum Arkeologi reviewed by at least two peer-reviewers who have the competence and appropriate field of expertise. Editorial received writings of archaeological research, history, ethnography, anthropology, and other supporting science related to human and culture. Forum Arkeologi is accredited as national scientific journal number 772 / AU1 / P2MI-LIPI / 08 / 2017. Starting at the end of 2016, Forum Arkeologi begins to use electronic journal systems following technological and information developments and facilitate reader access.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 553 Documents
SENI PERTUNJUKAN DALAM MASYARAKAT BALI KUNA ABAD X-XII: KAJIAN BERDASARKAN SUMBER PRASASTI I Ketut Setiawan
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 25, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2012
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4537.096 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/fa.v25i1.438

Abstract

TEMUAN STRUKTUR DI SITUS AIMOLI KABUPATEN ALOR, NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR I Wayan Suantika
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 27, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2014
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3101.63 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/fa.v27i2.70

Abstract

The finding of structure in Aimoli, Alor is archaeologically important. This research aims to determine the form, function, role, and the cause of the structure damage. Methods that applied are excavation, survey, and interview. The data analysis consists of morphology analysis, technical analysis, style analysis, and comparative analysis. The finding of building components, namely pedestal stone, round and elliptical stone, etc. This structure is considered as part of sacred building. This structure experienced destruction that was caused by geographical condition, less quality material, and limited knowledge of technology.Temuan struktur bangunan di Aimoli, Alor secara arkeologis sangat penting. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bentuk, fungsi, dan peran struktur, serta penyebab kerusakannya. Metode yang dipergunakan adalah ekskavasi, survei, dan wawancara. Analisis yang dipakai adalah analisis morfologi, teknik, gaya, dan komparatif terhadap temuan struktur bangunan di Aimoli. Beberapa bentuk batuan komponen bangunan, yaitu batu lapik, batu berbentuk lingkaran, batu berbentuk elips, dan lainnya. Struktur tersebut merupakan bagian dari bangunan keagamaan. Struktur mengalami kerusakan yang disebabkan oleh kondisi geografis, kualitas bahan yang kurang baik, dan penguasaan teknologi yang terbatas.
JEJAK PERADABAN ISLAM DI SITUS DOROBATA, KABUPATEN DOMPU, NUSA TENGGARA BARAT I Wayan Sumerata
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 27, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2014
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1189.862 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/fa.v27i3.34

Abstract

The process of Islamisation in Dompu was started since the collapse of Majapahit Kingdom. Archaeological data showed that traders coming from the Kingdom of Gowa, Makassar had spread Islam through trade channels. Evidences of the spread of Islam in Dompu can be seen from the ancient tombs, scattered in the region of West Nusa Tenggara. Those tombs are very important artefacts in order to know the process and the influence of Islam in the early spread. Some of the artifacts refering to the influence of Islam are found in Dorobata Site. The data were collected through excavation method, survey, and interviews with descriptive-qualitative analysis, supported by morphological and comparative analysis. The finds of this research are gravestones and sepulcher which is the evidence of burial in Dorobata. The decoration of the gravestone influenced by Bugis-Makassar culture, combined with the previous culture. Proses Islamisasi di Dompu dimulai sejak keruntuhan Kerajaan Majapahit. Data arkeologi menunjukan para pedagang yang berasal dari Kerajaan Gowa, Makassar telah menyebarkan Islam melalui jalur perdagangan. Bukti-bukti penyebaran Islam di Dompu dapat dilihat dari makam-makam kuno yang tersebar di wilayah Nusa Tenggara Barat. Makam ini menjadi artefak yang sangat penting untuk mengetahui proses dan pengaruh Islam pada masa awal penyebarannya. Beberapa artefak yang merujuk ke arah itu ditemukan di Situs Dorobata. Pengumpulan data menggunakan metode ekskavasi, survei, dan wawancara dengan analisis deskriptif-kualitatif, serta ditunjang dengan analisis morfologi dan komparatif. Artefak yang ditemukan adalah nisan dan jirat kubur yang merupakan bukti adanya penguburan di Dorobata. Ragam hias nisan ini dipengaruhi budaya Bugis Makassar yang dipadukan dengan budaya sebelumnya.
BATUGONG, SITUS ARKEOLOGI DI KABUPATEN SUMBAWA I Wayan Suantika
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 24, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2011
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1805.433 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/fa.v24i3.301

Abstract

PEMASYARAKATAN SERTA KEMITRAAN ARKEOLOGI DI BALI, NTB, DAN NTT Ayu Kusumawati
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 21, NOMOR 1, MEI 2008
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1576.442 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/fa.v21i1.388

Abstract

KAWASAN KARST PECATU DAN SEKITARNYA DALAM PERSPEKTIF GEOLOGI I Putu Yuda Haribuana
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 23, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2010
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1697.809 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/fa.v23i1.215

Abstract

REVITALISASI IDENTITAS MASYARAKAT DI KECAMATAN SANGGAR MELALUI DUNIA PENDIDIKAN Ni Putu Eka Juliawati
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 26, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2013
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1284.741 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/fa.v26i1.61

Abstract

Sanggar in the past was a kingdom on the Island of Sumbawa. Currently, Sanggar is a district in Bima Regency, West Nusa Tenggara Province. Sanggar has cultural remains, either tangible or intangible who had almost forgotten. In recent years, Sanggar people began to realize the importance of identity. Sanggar started to revitalize their cultural elements, one of them through formal education. This study raised the questions: What cultural elements are revitalized and what are the strategies undertaken in an effort to revitalize the Sanggar identity. The study was conducted in the District of Sanggar. Data were collected by the method of observation, library research and interviews. This research is a qualitative research. Data were analyzed with depth descriptive analysis and subsequently accommodated in the form of narrative. Sanggar cultural elements which are revitalized can be classified into tangible cultural elements which include a mosque, mausoleum, fort ruins and other artifacts and intangible cultural elements which include language and dances. The strategies carried out in an attempt to revitalize Sanggar cultures are by putting Sanggar local culture learning into the curriculum and conducting outside activities, namely nature tracking and visiting historical sites in Sanggar and performing arts activities.Sanggar di masa lalu adalah sebuah kerajaan di Pulau Sumbawa. Saat ini Sanggar merupakan sebuah kecamatan di Kabupaten Bima, Nusa Tenggara Barat. Sanggar memiliki tinggalan budaya baik benda maupun tak benda, yang sempat hampir terlupakan. Belakangan ini, masyarakat Sanggar mulai menyadari tentang pentingnya arti identitas. Unsur-unsur budaya Sanggar mulai direvitalisasi, salah satunya melalui dunia pendidikan formal. Rumusan permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah unsur-unsur budaya apa sajakah yang dibangkitkan kembali serta strategi apa sajakah yang dilakukan dalam upaya merevitalisasi identitas Sanggar. Penelitian dilakukan di wilayah Kecamatan Sanggar. Data dikumpulkan dengan metode observasi, studi pustaka dan wawancara. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif. Data dianalisis dengan metode deskriptif analitik mendalam dan selanjutnya diakomodasikan dalam bentuk naratif. Adapun unsur budaya Sanggar yang dibangkitkan kembali bisa diklasifikasikan ke dalam unsur budaya benda yang meliputi masjid, makam, sisa benteng dan artefak-artefak lainnya serta unsur budaya tak benda yang meliputi bahasa dan tarian. Strategi yang dilakukan dalam usaha merevitalisasi budaya Sanggar adalah dengan memasukkan pembelajaran budaya lokal Sanggar ke dalam kurikulum dan mengadakan kegiatan di luar jam kelas yaitu Lintas Alam mengunjungi situs-situs bersejarah di Sanggar dan kegiatan pentas seni.
JEJAK-JEJAK PERADABAN KUNO DI DESA GETASAN I Nyoman Sunarya
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 28, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2015
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1772.877 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/fa.v28i2.25

Abstract

Indication that ancient civilization has ever developed here is supported by archaeological remains found in Getasan Village. This research aims to understand the development of Getasan civilization in order to provide the information needed to reconstruct the cultural history of Bali. Data were collected through observation, i.e. excavation and survey, interview, and literature study. Data analysis was done through identification of archaeological remains, associated with the concepts of civilization. The results of analysis were presented using descriptive-qualitative approach. The result of this research shows that the findings of the structure in Getasan Village indicates the development of ancient civilization. The trails of civilization which were found there was a continuity from the previous culture. The interpretation is supported with the findings from survey that covers several locations in Getasan Village.Indikasi bahwa di Desa Getasan pernah berkembang peradaban masa lalu didukung juga dengan tinggalan-tinggalan arkeologinya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perkembangan peradaban di Desa Getasan agar mampu melengkapi informasi dalam merekonstruksi sejarah kebudayaan Bali. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui observasi, meliputi ekskavasi dan survei, wawancara, serta studi kepustakaan. Analisis dilakukan melalui identifikasi tinggalan arkeologi yang dikaitkan dengan konsep-konsep peradaban. Hasil analisis kemudian disajikan secara deskriptif-kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa temuan struktur di Desa Getasan mengindikasikan pernah berkembangnya peradaban kuno di wilayah ini. Desa Getasan memiliki jejak-jejak peradaban yang merupakan kelanjutan dari kebudayaan sebelumnya. Penafsiran tersebut didukung dengan temuan-temuan hasil survei yang dilakukan di beberapa lokasi di wilayah Desa Getasan.
RELIEF CILI DI PURA GUNUNG SEKAR DESA SANGSIT BULELENG Ayu Ambarawati
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 15, NOMOR 1, JUNI 2002
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (912.074 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/fa.v15i1.324

Abstract

SISA-SISA CANDI HINDU DI PURA CANDI MAS, DESA CANDI KUNING, KECAMATAN BATURITI, KABUPATEN TABANAN I Wayan Suantika
Forum Arkeologi VOLUME 23, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2010
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Bali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2769.792 KB) | DOI: 10.24832/fa.v23i3.292

Abstract


Filter by Year

1989 2021


Filter By Issues
All Issue VOLUME 34, NOMOR 2, OKTOBER 2021 VOLUME 34, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2021 VOLUME 33, NOMOR 2, OKTOBER 2020 VOLUME 33, NOMOR 1, April, 2020 VOLUME 32, NOMOR 2, OKTOBER, 2019 VOLUME 32, NOMOR 1, APRIL, 2019 VOLUME 31, NOMOR 2, OKTOBER, 2018 VOLUME 31, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2018 VOLUME 30, NOMOR 2, OKTOBER 2017 VOLUME 30, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2017 VOLUME 29, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2016 VOLUME 29, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2016 VOLUME 29, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2016 VOLUME 28, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2015 VOLUME 28, NO 3, NOVEMBER 2015 VOLUME 28, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2015 VOLUME 28, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2015 VOLUME 27, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2014 VOLUME 27, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2014 VOLUME 27, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2014 VOLUME 26, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2013 VOLUME 26, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2013 VOLUME 26, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2013 VOLUME 25, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2012 VOLUME 25, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2012 VOLUME 25, NO 1, APRIL 2012 VOLUME 25, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2012 VOLUME 24, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2011 VOLUME 24, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2011 VOLUME 24, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2011 VOLUME 23, NOMOR 3, NOVEMBER 2010 VOLUME 23, NOMOR 2, AGUSTUS 2010 VOLUME 23, NOMOR 1, APRIL 2010 VOLUME 22, NOMOR 1, MEI 2009 VOLUME 21, NOMOR 3, OKTOBER 2008 VOLUME 21, NOMOR 2, JULI 2008 VOLUME 21, NOMOR 1, MEI 2008 VOLUME 20, NOMOR 1, MEI 2007 VOLUME 19, NOMOR 2, OKTOBER 2006 VOLUME 19, NOMOR 1, MEI 2006 VOLUME 17, NOMOR 1, JUNI 2004 VOLUME 16, NOMOR 3, SEPTEMBER 2003 VOLUME 16, NOMOR 2, JUNI 2003 VOLUME 15, NOMOR 2, SEPTEMBER 2002 VOLUME 15, NOMOR 1, JUNI 2002 VOLUME 14, NOMOR 1, JULI 2001 VOLUME 13, NOMOR 2, NOVEMBER 2000 VOLUME 13, NOMOR 1, JUNI 2000 VOLUME 11, NOMOR 2, DESEMBER 1999 VOLUME 11, NOMOR 2, DESEMBER 1998 VOLUME 11, NOMOR 1, JANUARI 1998 VOLUME 10, NOMOR 2, NOVEMBER 1997 VOLUME 10, NOMOR 1, JUNI 1997 VOLUME 9, NOMOR 1, JANUARI 1996 VOLUME 8, NOMOR 2, MARET 1995 VOLUME 6, NOMOR 2, SEPTEMBER 1993 VOLUME 6, NOMOR 1, MARET 1993 VOLUME 2, NOMOR 2, FEBRUARI 1990 VOLUME 2, NOMOR 1, FEBRUARI 1989 More Issue