Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Implementasi Putusan No. 27/PhPu.D-VIII/2010 Mengenai Perselisihan hasil Pemilihan umum Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Lamongan Siahaan, Maruarar
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

The objection of petitioner on the recount results by the Election Commission of Lamongan on the orders of the interlocutory injunction of the Court ,was not examined further and be heard simultaneously with the Commission report on the implementation of interlocutory injunction in a hearing open to the public, and thereafter immediately the Constitutional Court considered the objection has no juridical value. The final decision then confirmed the Commission’s decision on the result of the recounting. Nonetheless, the function of the interlocutory verdict must be understood as a mechanism to prepare the final verdict. Therefore, the results of the interlocutory verdict must be heard and examined in a session open to the parties and the public, to be used as the basis for a final decision. The hearing process before the final verdict has been decide, does not end with the announcement of the interlocutory verdict. Implementation of the Constitutional Court decision on the district election dispute has been uninhibited, but in one case. Although the number is quantitatively insignificant, it is qualitatively very important as a lesson learned in that the Court is still in need to improve its performance in guarding the consolidation of democracy.

Sengketa Pemilukada Kotawaringin Barat (Analisis Terhadap Putusan MK No. 45/PHPU.D-VIII/2010 dari Perspektif Hukum Negara dan Hukum Islam) Noorwahidah, Noorwahidah
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

In addressing the problem Dispute of Election Results (PHPU) of West Kotawaringin, the Constitutional Court (MK) has made a controversial decision. The decision was not only disqualifying candidates, but also ordered the Local Election Commission to appoint elected mayor and deputy mayor. Some experts argue this decision exceeds the authority of the Court. Some other judge that the Court is correct. The Act does give authority to the Constitutional Court to try a PHPU case but not explicitly regulate and define the authority to disqualify a winner. Thus, this decision is an ijtihad of the judges. From the law and legislation of view the decision was not contrary to law. In the Islamic perspective, the decision was in line with maqashid ash-Sharia (Shari’a purposes).

Suara Terbanyak dan Kualitas Anggota DPRD Provinsi DIY (Implementasi Putusan MK No. 22-24/ PUU-VI/2008 dalam Pemilu 2009) FH-Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Pusat Kajian Konstitusi dan Pemerintahan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

The implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 22-24/ PUU-VI/2008 about counting majority votes in 2009 legislative elections in the province of DIY has a significant effect. considering the system used in the vote count to determine the members of both national and local legislatures are new and very different from previous elections. However, these effects are not caused major problems, because before the election day, the decision has been disseminated by each political party internally and implemented by Electoral Commission. Although the Constitutional Court decision issued after a waiting list of legislative candidates have been announced by the KPU.

Telaah Kritik Atas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Perkara Perselisihan Hasil Pemilukada Provinsi Jawa Timur Ekatjahjana, Widodo
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Decision of Constitutional Court of Number 41/PHPU.D-VI/2008 is a controversial judicial decison in practices of Constitutional Court in Indonesia. The decison had legal basis of Law of Number 18 of 2008 that against formally with the Constitutions of 1945. Nevertheless, in fact, inconstitutional practice of the court system has taken legitimacy source of convention. It is very important for development of constitutional law enforcement in Indonesia, that the decision was not only show how the Constitutional Court improves its constitutional authorities to handle disputes of regional head election result in Indonesia, but also that was first time how the Constitutional Court has brought its justice paradigm change toward process of substantial justice and law enforcement.

Kejujuran dalam Bingkai Hak Memilih-Dipilih (Pelajaran dari Pemilukada Bengkulu Selatan) Ghoffar, Abdul
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

This article discusses two decision of the Constitutional Court. First, the Constitutional Court Decision No. 57/PHPU.D-VI/2008 on Election Dispute of Regional Head of South Bengkulu, which disqualify the candidate elected, Dirwan Mahmud, because it proved to be dishonest if he had been sentenced 7 years in prison, to the detriment of the rights of citizens to choose obtain correct information about the future leaders will be chosen. Second, the Constitutional Court Decision No. 4/PUU-VII/2009 about the review of Article 12 sub-article g and Article 50 paragraph (1) sub-article g election law, and Article 58 sub-article f Local Government Act, which gives the right choosen to convict (common criminal) after five years sentence expired with the condition that he honestly convey to the public if he is a former convict. This paper focuses on the importance of honesty in the implementation of the right to vote and be elected citizens.

Implikasi Putusan MK No. 22-24/Puu-VI/2008 Terhadap Model Affirmative Action (Studi di DPRD Provinsi Jawa Tengah Hasil Pemilu Legislatif 2009) Semarang, Pusat Kajian Konstitusi FH-Universitas 17 Agustus 1945
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

After the Constitutional Court decision number 22-24/PUU-VI/2008, there are a shift competition between political parties for candidate-between, especially in political parties. It also implies the strategy of the campaign. Acquisition of candidates for seats in the Parliament of the province of Central Java went from 15 seats in the elections of 2004 to 21 seats in the elections of 2009. This increase was caused by political parties factor, the figure of the candidates, and campaign strategy, as well as a small number of candidates. In nomerik there are 92 between 100 candidates were elected in a small number (1,2,3) and especially among the 21 candidates selected, 20 women also occupy the small number (1,2,3). Recommendation for these problems are: the provisions of the article and / or clause which States that... List of candidates have been prepared on the basis of the number of series that contains at least 30% (thirty percent) of the representation of women is maintained and is complemented by the formula in each electoral district; The provisions of article and/or the point of, which states that ... In the list of candidates will be every three (3) candidates, at least one (1) of female candidates was retained and supplemented formula ... In the list of candidates will be every three (3) candidates, at least 1 (one) female candidate who was placed on a small number of not less than 30% (thirty percent) of the number of constituencies, and the future of affirmative action based models quota of 30 % (thirty percent) and zipper for women candidates and the placement model in a limited number is not sufficient to maintain a procedure, but must be accompanied by the development of the cultural climate of recruitment politician in their respective political parties competing in elections and the increase in the specific political education for women.

Implikasi Putusan MK No. 102/PUU-VII/2009 Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah (Studi di Kabupaten Malang dan Kota Pasuruan) FH-Universitas Brawijaya, Pusat Kajian Konstitusi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

The Constitutional Court Decision No. 102/PUU-VII/2009 has provided new scope in the implementation of democratization process in Indonesia. The decision has simplyfied the administrative requirement of voters in the Presidential Election held in July 8th 2009, which is the permit to use the Citizen Identification Card (KTP) and Passport as voter identification requirement in voting day. This regulation more or less have strengthen the guarantee of citizen’s rights in this democratic event. The Court decission No. 102/PUU-VII/2009, implicated in building argumentations which related to the Local Election Commision attitudes and policies in resolving problems which occurs in the Fixed List of Voters (DPT) in the event of local elections.

Implementasi Putusan No. 27/PhPu.D-VIII/2010 Mengenai Perselisihan hasil Pemilihan umum Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Lamongan Maruarar Siahaan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The objection of petitioner on the recount results by the Election Commission of Lamongan on the orders of the interlocutory injunction of the Court ,was not examined further and be heard simultaneously with the Commission report on the implementation of interlocutory injunction in a hearing open to the public, and thereafter immediately the Constitutional Court considered the objection has no juridical value. The final decision then confirmed the Commission’s decision on the result of the recounting. Nonetheless, the function of the interlocutory verdict must be understood as a mechanism to prepare the final verdict. Therefore, the results of the interlocutory verdict must be heard and examined in a session open to the parties and the public, to be used as the basis for a final decision. The hearing process before the final verdict has been decide, does not end with the announcement of the interlocutory verdict. Implementation of the Constitutional Court decision on the district election dispute has been uninhibited, but in one case. Although the number is quantitatively insignificant, it is qualitatively very important as a lesson learned in that the Court is still in need to improve its performance in guarding the consolidation of democracy.

Sengketa Pemilukada Kotawaringin Barat (Analisis Terhadap Putusan MK No. 45/PHPU.D-VIII/2010 dari Perspektif Hukum Negara dan Hukum Islam) Noorwahidah Noorwahidah
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

In addressing the problem Dispute of Election Results (PHPU) of West Kotawaringin, the Constitutional Court (MK) has made a controversial decision. The decision was not only disqualifying candidates, but also ordered the Local Election Commission to appoint elected mayor and deputy mayor. Some experts argue this decision exceeds the authority of the Court. Some other judge that the Court is correct. The Act does give authority to the Constitutional Court to try a PHPU case but not explicitly regulate and define the authority to disqualify a winner. Thus, this decision is an ijtihad of the judges. From the law and legislation of view the decision was not contrary to law. In the Islamic perspective, the decision was in line with maqashid ash-Sharia (Shari’a purposes).

Suara Terbanyak dan Kualitas Anggota DPRD Provinsi DIY (Implementasi Putusan MK No. 22-24/ PUU-VI/2008 dalam Pemilu 2009) Pusat Kajian Konstitusi dan Pemerintahan FH-Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 8, No 1 (2011)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 22-24/ PUU-VI/2008 about counting majority votes in 2009 legislative elections in the province of DIY has a significant effect. considering the system used in the vote count to determine the members of both national and local legislatures are new and very different from previous elections. However, these effects are not caused major problems, because before the election day, the decision has been disseminated by each political party internally and implemented by Electoral Commission. Although the Constitutional Court decision issued after a waiting list of legislative candidates have been announced by the KPU.

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name -

Contact Email -

Phone -

Journal Mail Official jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location Kota adm. jakarta pusat, Dki jakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
jurnalkonstitusi@mkri.id

Editorial Address
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6. Jakarta 10110

Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,

Dki jakarta

INDONESIA