cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
ISSN : 25806777     EISSN : 25806785     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media
International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies (IJLRES), published by English Language Center, Faculty of Education and Teachers Training, State Islamic University (UIN) of North Sumatra, Medan - Indonesia is an open access journal that can be used as the medium of interaction for all scholars in the range of Language, Research and Education Studies.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Inpress" : 12 Documents clear
Regulation of The Analysis of Suspicious Financial Transactions as Documentary Evidence R, Ade Putra; Yuliati, Yuliati; Widyanti, Yenny Etta; Istiqomah, Milda
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Inpress
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.28165

Abstract

The handling of money laundering cases in Indonesia reveals a normative tension between evidentiary rules and the confidentiality regime governing financial intelligence. Financial Transaction Analysis Reports issued by the Indonesian Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) contain strategic information essential for tracing illicit financial flows, yet their evidentiary status remains contested due to statutory obligations to protect the identity of reporting parties. This study examines the legal position of financial intelligence reports within the Indonesian criminal justice system, particularly in relation to documentary evidence recognized under money laundering legislation. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research analyzes relevant laws, judicial practices, and doctrinal interpretations governing evidence in money laundering prosecutions. The findings demonstrate that while money laundering laws formally recognize documents as valid evidence, financial intelligence reports are functionally constrained by confidentiality provisions, limiting their direct use in evidentiary proceedings. This legal ambiguity generates uncertainty in law enforcement practices and raises concerns regarding procedural fairness and legal certainty. The study concludes that a clearer regulatory framework is required to reconcile evidentiary needs with confidentiality obligations, ensuring both effective prosecution and protection of reporting entities.
Legal Status of Social Inquiry Reports in Juvenile Sentencing under the Best Interests of the Child Principle Hermawan, Furkon Adi; Madjid, Abdul; Ruslijanto, Patricia Audrey
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Inpress
Publisher : State Islamic University of North Sumatra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijlres.v9i2.28463

Abstract

Juvenile sentencing is designed to reflect the principles of protection, rehabilitation, and the best interests of the child. In Indonesia, Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System requires judges to consider Social Inquiry Reports (Laporan Penelitian Kemasyarakatan or Litmas) prior to imposing sentences on children. This article examines the legal status of Social Inquiry Reports and clarifies the normative meaning of the obligation to consider them within judicial reasoning. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study analyzes relevant legislation, legal doctrines, and selected juvenile court decisions. The findings indicate that Social Inquiry Reports function as non-juridical instruments intended to support individualized sentencing rather than as binding recommendations. Judicial practice, however, demonstrates varying degrees of engagement with these reports, ranging from formal reference to substantive consideration. This article concludes that interpreting the obligation to consider Social Inquiry Reports as a substantive and argumentative duty enhances the application of the best interests of the child principle while preserving judicial independence in juvenile sentencing. By framing Article 60(3) as a reason-giving duty, this article offers an operational standard for assessing whether judges meaningfully engage with Litmas in their sentencing reasons, thereby enriching the discussion on individualized juvenile sentencing.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Inpress Vol 9, No 1 (2025): International Journal on Language, Research (Law) Education Studies Vol 4, No 3 (2020): Language, Research, and Education Vol 4, No 2 (2020): Language, Research, and Education Vol 4, No 1 (2020): Language, Research, Education Vol 3, No 3 (2019): Language, Research, Education Vol 3, No 2 (2019): Language, Research and Education Vol 3, No 1 (2019): Language, Research and Education Vol 2, No 3 (2018): Language, Research, Education Vol 2, No 2 (2018): Language, Research, Education Vol 2, No 1 (2018): Language, Research, Education Vol 1, No 2 (2017) Vol 1, No 1 (2017): Language, Research and Education Studies More Issue