cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Virsyah Jayadilaga
Contact Email
pusbangdatin@gmail.com
Phone
+628122115449
Journal Mail Official
pusbangdatin@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan H.R. Rasuna Said Kavling 4-5, Jakarta Selatan 12940
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure
Published by Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum, Kementerian Hukum Republik Indonesia
ISSN : 25798561     EISSN : 14105632     DOI : 10.30641
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other
The De Jure Legal Research Journal, known as Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, is a legal publication issued three times a year in March, July, and November. It is published by the Law Policy Strategy Agency of the Ministry of Law of the Republic of Indonesia, in collaboration with the Indonesian Legal Researcher Association (IPHI). This association was legalized under the Decree of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number AHU-13.AHA.01.07 in 2013, dated January 28, 2013. The journal serves as a platform for communication and a means to publish diverse and relevant legal issues primarily for Indonesian legal researchers and the broader legal community. In 2024, the management of the De Jure Legal Research Journal will include various stakeholders, as outlined in the Decree of the Head of the Law and Human Rights Policy Agency Number PPH-18.LT.04.03 for 2024, dated February 20, 2024, which establishes a publishing team for the journal. According to the Decree of the Director-General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia, Number PPH-18.LT.04.03 for 2024, which is based on the Accreditation Results of Scientific Journals for Period 2 of 2024, the De Jure Legal Research Journal has achieved a Scientific Journal Accreditation Rank of 2 (Sinta-2). This reaccreditation is valid for Volume 23, Number 1, of the year 2023, through Volume 27, Number 4, of the year 2027.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 25, No 1 (2025): March Edition" : 5 Documents clear
Pasar Digital dan Eksploitasi Data: Mengatasi Penyalahgunaan Dominasi Berdasarkan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Indonesia Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa; Lita, Helza Nova; Adrian Pah, Gress Gustia
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 25, No 1 (2025): March Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2025.V25.1-18

Abstract

Practices exploiting personal data, particularly by dominant players, can lead to unfair competitive advantages. The power derived from service providers' access and control over users' data can capture the market from existing competitors and potential entrants, potentially resulting in higher and even discriminatory consumer prices. This article, employing a combination of normative juridical research and Reform-Oriented Research methodology, aims to establish the exploitation of personal data as a form of abuse of the dominant position in the digital market under Indonesian competition law. The article argues that the practices of digital service providers exploiting personal data, facilitated by the conditions of the digital market and their dominant positions, create barriers for competitors and deter potential entrants. This ultimately meets the element of abuse of dominant position under Article 25 of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition, rendering such practices per se illegal. The article concludes by suggesting that lawmakers should establish a framework and adequate regulations to address the exploitation of personal data by business actors in the digital market. This would promote fair business competition and protect the interests of digital service users. 
Hustle Culture: Celah Pelanggaran terhadap Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Nugrahani, Ellen Lutya Putri; Rafsanjani, Jody Imam; Anggayudha, Zaihan Harmaen; Nasution, Hilmi Ardani
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 25, No 1 (2025): March Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2025.V25.19-34

Abstract

Hustle Culture promotes hard work and exceeding standard working hours as a pathway to career success. However, it is often exploited to justify practices that violate labor laws, such as forcing employees to work beyond regulated hours without fair overtime pay or compensation. While seen as a driver of productivity, Hustle Culture risks undermining workers’ rights and well-being. This article examines how companies misuse Hustle Culture to manipulate employees into working excessively, potentially breaching labor laws. It also explores the balance between hard work and the protection of workers’ rights, emphasizing the need for healthy and sustainable work environments. Using a normative method with a qualitative descriptive approach, the study analyzes relevant legal documents. Findings indicate that Hustle Culture can be weaponized by employers to coerce excessive labor, disregarding the negative impacts on workers’ physical and mental health. Such practices not only harm employee welfare but also risk violating labor laws on working hours and overtime pay. This research highlights the importance of aligning workplace expectations with legal protections to ensure fair treatment and long-term sustainability in professional environments.
Menerapkan Pasal 18B Ayat (1) UUD 1945: Diskursus tentang Konstitusionalitas Pemerintahan Daerah Khusus Ibu Kota Nusantara Sadiawati, Diani; Setiadi, Wicipto; Hanggawan, Miftah Farid
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 25, No 1 (2025): March Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2025.V25.35-48

Abstract

Law No. 3 of 2022 on the National Capital, as amended by Law No. 21 of 2023, has sparked legal and academic debates, particularly regarding its constitutionality. Despite six judicial review petitions in the Constitutional Court, the Special Regional Government of Nusantara Capital (Pemdasus Ibu Kota Nusantara) has not been comprehensively assessed. This study examines its constitutionality based on the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945), global practices, and Constitutional Court rulings, focusing on three key issues: the nomenclature of Nusantara Capital, the status and leadership appointment of the Nusantara Capital Authority, and the absence of a Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD). Using a juridical-normative approach, this study analyzes UUD 1945, the National Capital Law, Constitutional Court decisions, and academic literature. The findings highlight three main points. First, Nusantara’s nomenclature aligns with Article 18B(1) of UUD 1945, which recognizes special regions. Second, the status and leadership appointment mechanism of the Nusantara Capital Authority do not violate Article 18(4), as confirmed in Constitutional Court Decision No. 11/PUU-IV/2008. Third, the absence of a DPRD is constitutionally valid since special regions allow institutional variations, as affirmed in Constitutional Court Decisions No. 81/PUU-VIII/2010 and No. 11/PUU-IV/2008. In conclusion, Nusantara’s governance is constitutionally grounded in Article 18B(1) of UUD 1945 and relevant Constitutional Court rulings. Its flexible institutional design remains valid as long as it is legally established.
Kejahatan, Moralitas dan Dekolonisasi: Analisis Perbandingan Kritis terhadap Reformasi Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan India Kavia, Aditi Singh; Chouhan, Karan Singh
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 25, No 1 (2025): March Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2025.V25.49-66

Abstract

The criminal laws have undergone a comprehensive reform with the enactment of the Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), 2023 in Indonesia and  Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 in India. Those circumstances have raised serious questions concerning human rights. The newly enacted Criminal laws were introduced as a comprehensive reform to supersede the outdated colonial-era legislation, with the intention of dismantling colonial legacy. This study endeavors to conduct a critical evaluation of the extent to which recent criminal law reforms in Indonesia and India conform to the principles of decolonization. Specifically, it examines whether these reforms aligns with legal morality and human rights, evaluating whether they dismantle colonial legal legacies or inadvertently reinforce them. Furthermore, it aims to conceptualize various frameworks of morality, its nexus with law and explores the morality dilemmas by situating the study within the theoretical framework of decolonization. The research follows a comparative and doctrinal legal research approach, critically analyzing offenses against state, morality and religion-based offenses such as blasphemy, adultery, sedition, homosexuality, abortion among others. The findings of the study reveal that reforms of criminal codes have instead reinforced colonial morality and has disproportionality affected human rights of minorities. Through this study, the author concludes that true decolonization can be achieved when the colonial structures are questioned, colonial institutions are dismantled and the laws are in alignment with the international human rights standards. It is also recommended that the reform process should be continuous, democratic, empirical and ensure traditional belief and  moralities are respected without infringing on individual rights.
Analisis Perbandingan Penerapan Konsep Checks and Balances dalam Proses Legislasi di Amerika Serikat, Rusia, dan Indonesia Dirkareshza, Rianda; NAM Sihombing, Eka; Fauzan, Muhammad
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 25, No 1 (2025): March Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law and Human Rights of The Repub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2025.V25.67-80

Abstract

In the framework of Indonesia’s constitutional governance, the principle of checks and balances among constitutional institutions is an essential component of the legal system. Indonesia adopts a bicameral legislative system involving the House of Representatives (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat; DPR) and the Regional Representative Council (Dewan Perwakilan Daerah; DPD). However, DPD possesses limited legislative authority, particularly in drafting laws. Additionally, judicial oversight is conducted by the Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung/MA). This issue gives rise to research questions pertaining to  raised in this study are about the oversight concept in the lawmaking process from the perspective of comparative constitutionalism and the reconstruction of the oversight concept to realize enhance checks and balances. This study employs a mixed -method approach, incorporating normative-juridical, comparative, and conceptual methodologies  and legislative analysis. The findings indicate that Indonesia implements a soft bicameral concept characterized by an asymmetry of authority with in between the two both chambers in the lawmaking process, with the Constitutional Court acting as the primary a judicial oversight mechanism. In contrast, the United States and Russia maintain robust internal oversight within their legislative institutions, complemented judicial authority to oversee law implementation, thereby reinforcing  checks and balances between the legislative and judicial branches. It is recommended that the oversight framework within Indonesia’s legislative process be strengthened by reconstructing oversight mechanisms through the expansion of the DPD’s role, particularly in reviewing, approving, or vetoing draft legislation. This expansion is advised to enhance internal legislative oversight and create a more balanced system of checks and balances between legislative bodies. Furthermore, the reconstruction of oversight concepts in the lawmaking process should be pursued by granting the DPD greater authority to accept or veto draft laws, thereby reinforcing internal oversight within the legislative process

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 25, No 3 (2025): November Edition Vol 25, No 2 (2025): July Edition Vol 25, No 1 (2025): March Edition Vol 24, No 3 (2024): November Edition Vol 24, No 2 (2024): July Edition Vol 24, No 1 (2024): March Edition Vol 23, No 4 (2023): December Edition Vol 23, No 3 (2023): September Edition Vol 23, No 2 (2023): June Edition Vol 23, No 1 (2023): March Edition Vol 22, No 4 (2022): December Edition Vol 22, No 3 (2022): September Edition Vol 22, No 2 (2022): June Edition Vol 22, No 1 (2022): March Edition Vol 21, No 4 (2021): December Edition Vol 21, No 3 (2021): September Edition Vol 21, No 2 (2021): June Edition Vol 21, No 1 (2021): Edisi Maret Vol 20, No 4 (2020): Edisi Desember Vol 20, No 3 (2020): Edisi September Vol 20, No 2 (2020): Edisi Juni Vol 20, No 1 (2020): Edisi Maret Vol 19, No 4 (2019): Edisi Desember Vol 19, No 3 (2019): Edisi September Vol 19, No 2 (2019): Edisi Juni Vol 19, No 1 (2019): Edisi Maret Vol 18, No 4 (2018): Edisi Desember Vol 18, No 3 (2018): Edisi September Vol 18, No 2 (2018): Edisi Juni Vol 18, No 1 (2018): Edisi Maret Vol 17, No 4 (2017): Edisi Desember Vol 17, No 3 (2017): Edisi September Vol 17, No 2 (2017): Edisi Juni Vol 17, No 1 (2017): Edisi Maret Vol 16, No 4 (2016): Edisi Desember Vol 16, No 3 (2016): Edisi September Vol 16, No 2 (2016): Edisi Juni Vol 16, No 1 (2016): Edisi Maret More Issue