cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
japr.editor@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Plot No. 105/42, Opposite electricity sub station, Changorabhata, Raipur (Chhattisgarh), India 492001
Location
,
INDONESIA
Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Research
Published by Creative Pharma Assent
ISSN : -     EISSN : 23480335     DOI : 10.18231
Core Subject : Health,
Medicine & Pharmacology
Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Research (JOAPR) is an official publication of Creative Pharma Assent (CPA). It is an open access, peer review online international journal. JOAPR is primarily focused on multiple discipline of pharmaceutical sciences (Pharmaceutics, Pharmaceutical Technology, Biopharmaceutics, Cosmetic Technology, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmaceutical/Medicinal Chemistry, Computational Chemistry and Molecular Drug Design, Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, Herbal drugs/ formulations, Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Analysis, Pharmacy Practice, Clinical and Hospital Pharmacy, Cell Biology, Genomics and Proteomics, Pharmacogenomics, Bioinformatics and Biotechnology of Pharmaceutical Interest) which publish quarterly. JOAPR also includes evaluation of pharmaceutical excipients & their practical application to research & industry based efforts. The aim of the scientific journal, JOAPR is to present a wide area for the current researchers to share their noble works and ideas in terms of the research papers, review articles and short communications. JOAPR only publish the original research works with a definite innovation and novelty after thorough reviewing. The paper must have a suitable and proper scientific background.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023)" : 12 Documents clear
Comparison of intracuff alkalinized 2% lignocaine versus dexamethasone for attenuation of post operative laryngotracheal morbidity: a randomized comparative study Rajbala; Sonali Beniwal; Mamta Khandelwal; T Mirthun Thomas
Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Research Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Creative Pharma Assent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18231/j.joapr.2023.11.2.53.57

Abstract

Introduction: This randomized comparative study was planned to compare intracuff alkalinized lignocaine versus dexamethasone in preventing postoperative laryngotracheal morbidity. During general anesthesia patients were intubated with cuffed endotracheal tubes to provide effective positive pressure ventilation as well to prevent risk of aspiration. The cuffs of endotracheal tubes were inflated with air. This air in these cuffed endotracheal tubes can cause significant laryngotracheal morbidity. So, we planned this study to find a better substitute other than air to prevent postoperative laryngotracheal morbidity. Material and methods: Total 56 cases were taken. In group A, the cuff of the endotracheal tube was filled with 2% lignocaine 2 ml (40 mg) and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3 8.4%) 1 ml (total 3 ml volume). In Group B, the cuff of the endotracheal tube was filled with dexamethasone (8 mg) 2 ml with 1 ml NS (total 3 ml volume). Results: The incidence of sore throat and hoarseness was less in the alkalinized lignocaine group. (p value > 0.05). While the incidence of coughing was roughly similar in both groups and at different time intervals (P value >0.05). Conclusion: Intracuff alkalinized Lignocaine in comparison to intracuff dexamethasone causes less incidence of sore throat and hoarseness in post operative period thus improved patient comfort levels and better recovery profile.
Comparison of ropivacaine 0.5% with dexmedetomidine and clonidine as adjuvants in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgery Kiwi Mantan; Rakesh; Sandeep Kothari; T. Agalya; Anita Pareek; Neha Chahar; Bhanupriya
Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Research Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Creative Pharma Assent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18231/j.joapr.2023.11.2.46.52

Abstract

Background: The Institutional Ethics Committee and patients' informed written consent were obtained before this study was carried out in the Department of Anaesthesiology at Sardar Patel Medical College in Bikaner, Rajasthan. An established method for delivering anaesthesia and analgesia during upper limb surgery is brachial plexus block. For peripheral nerve blocks, ropivacaine, a long-acting amide with a safe cardiac profile, is chosen. It has been proven that different adjuncts may be added to LA solutions to boost their effectiveness and longevity while lowering the overall dose of LA utilised and minimising any systemic side effects. Our goal was to assess the effectiveness of adjuvants such as dexmedetomidine and clonidine in comparison to 0.5% ropivacaine in an infraclavicular block for upper limb surgery under USG guidance. Method: Fifty adult patients planned for elective upperlimb surgery with an infraclavicular brachial plexus block under USG guidance were included. All research participants were split into two groups at random. In groups D and C, respectively, dexmedetomidine and clonidine were used as adjuvants with 0.5% ropivacaine. Our main goal was to compare the postoperative analgesic duration in both research groups, as well as the onset and duration of sensory and motor block. Patients were monitored for any complications connected to the medicine and procedure while hemodynamic indicators were also compared. Results: Group D's sensory and motor block action initiation time was substantially quicker than that of group C's (p 0.001). When compared to Group C, Group D's sensory and motor block and postoperative analgesia durations were considerably longer (p value 0.001). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is a more effective adjuvant than clonidine when given during upper limb surgery with an infraclavicular block that is guided by a USG.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 13 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 12 No. 6 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 5 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 11 No. 5 (2023) Vol. 11 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 11 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 10 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 10 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 9 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 9 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 8 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2019) Vol 7 No 3 (2019) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2019) Vol 7 No 2 (2019) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019) Vol 7 No 1 (2019) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019) Vol 6 No 4 (2018) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2018) Vol 6 No 3 (2018) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2018) Vol 6 No 2 (2018) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018) Vol 6 No 1 (2018) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018) Vol 5 No 4 (2017) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2017) Vol 5 No 3 (2017) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2017) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017) Vol 5 No 2 (2017) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 1 (2017) Vol 4 No 4 (2016) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2016) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2016) Vol 4 No 3 (2016) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016) Vol 4 No 2 (2016) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 1 (2016) Vol 3 No 4 (2015) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2015) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2015) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015) Vol 3 No 2 (2015) Vol 3 No 1 (2015) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015) Vol 2 No 4 (2014) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2014) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2014) Vol 2 No 2 (2014) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 1 (2014) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 1 (2013) More Issue