Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Civil Engineering Journal

cej
Website

Published by C.E.J Publishing Group

ISSN : 24763055 EISSN : 24763055 DOI : -

Core Subject : Engineering,

Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture

Civil Engineering Journal is a multidisciplinary, an open-access, internationally double-blind peer -reviewed journal concerned with all aspects of civil engineering, which include but are not necessarily restricted to: Building Materials and Structures, Coastal and Harbor Engineering, Constructions Technology, Constructions Management, Road and Bridge Engineering, Renovation of Buildings, Earthquake Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Geotechnical Engineering, Highway Engineering, Hydraulic and Hydraulic Structures, Structural Engineering, Surveying and Geo-Spatial Engineering, Transportation Engineering, Tunnel Engineering, Urban Engineering and Economy, Water Resources Engineering, Urban Drainage.

Arjuna Subject : -

Articles 16 Documents

1 2

Search results for , issue "Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December" : 16 Documents clear

BIM as Evaluation Tool for Existing Building Energy and Quantities Takeoff M. Abd, Abbas; Khamees, Alaa Sameer
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Information technology and its application have resulted in enormous development in the construction industry during the last decade. The main reason behind this evolution was the incorporation of Building Information Modeling (BIM) to be an inefficient construction approach. BIM is now globally considered to be the tool of transforming the construction process to new era. It is also considered as a good tool for the whole project lifecycle. The aim of the present study is to clarify how BIM can be used in after project construction within uncertainty and risky environment such as document losses and unrecorded change orders. Interviews with project team, project site photography, collecting the available schemes and documents were the approaches used in this work to re-build the projects models. The results obtained from this work show that the knowledge and expectations of BIM within existing building have an admirable achievements for construction industry. Furthermore, BIM approach used in this work made more progress in the implementation of BIM as a rehabilitation and renovation tool in civil projects. The conclusions from this study reflect high correlation between the quantities take off with what as-built constructed, more than the traditional approach. The glamorous lessons derived from BIM implementation for the case study is; working with a model in which all project team feel comfortable and harmonic, will ensure enough resources to make the model updated and ought to lead to a minimum conflict within the model or what traditionally calledÂ âproject documentsâ.

Numerical Simulation on the Stability of Surrounding Rock of Horizontal Rock Strata in the Tunnel Zhang, Nian; Wang, Weihong; Yang, Zhuoqiang; Zhang, Jianian
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Horizontal rock strata is a geological condition of rock which is often encountered in the tunnel construction, and it has an important influence on the tunnel construction, it is necessary to analyze and study the stability of horizontal rock strata in tunnel construction to ensure the tunnel constructionâ€™s safety and efficiency. By taking â€œXishan Highway Tunnelâ€ as the research object, and using the numerical simulation method, the numerical model of the tunnel has been established in the Midas/GTS to simulate the tunnel excavation under the horizontal rock strata conditionï¼Œand the deformation and failure mechanism of surrounding rock and the influence factors of surrounding rock stability after are studied and analyzed. The research focused on the displacement of surrounding rock horizontal and vertical deformation, the results show that the vertical displacement of the surrounding rock is obviously greater than that of other parts during the excavation of the horizontal rock tunnel. According to the calculation results, the optimization measures of horizontal stratum tunnel construction method are put forward, which has important reference value for ensuring the construction safety and construction quality.

Size and Shape Optimization of Space Trusses Considering Geometrical Imperfection-Sensitivity in Buckling Constraints Fardad Haghpanah; Hamid Foroughi
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Optimal design considering buckling of compressive members is an important subject in structural engineering. The strength of compressive members can be compensated by initial geometrical imperfection due to the manufacturing process; therefore, geometrical imperfection can affect the optimal design of structures. In this study, the metaheuristic teaching-learning-based-optimization (TLBO) algorithm is applied to study the geometrical imperfection-sensitivity of members’ buckling in the optimal design of space trusses. Three benchmark trusses and a real-life bridge with continuous and discrete design variables are considered, and the results of optimization are compared for different degrees of imperfection, namely 0.001, 0.002, and 0.003. The design variables are the cross-sectional areas, and the objective is to minimize the total weight of the structures under the following constraints: tensile and compressive yielding stress, Euler buckling stress considering imperfection, nodal displacement, and available cross-sectional areas. The results reveal that higher geometrical imperfection degrees significantly change the critical buckling load of compressive members, and consequently, increase the weight of the optimal design. This increase varies from 0.4 to 119% for different degrees of imperfection in the studied trusses.

Factors that Undermine Service Delivery by Civil Engineers in South African Local Municipalities Zeleke Bekele Worku; Reginald Legoabe
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

The objective of study was to identify and quantify key predictors of job satisfaction among civil engineers working in South African local municipalities. The design of study was cross-sectional, descriptive and evaluative. The study was conducted against the background of shortage of suitably qualified, adequately motivated and skilled civil engineers working in local municipalities. The degree of job satisfaction of respondents was assessed by using a composite index developed by Turkyilmaz, Akman, Ozkan and Pastuszak (2011) for conducting a similar study. A combination of quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection and analyses were used in the study. As part of the quantitative aspect of study, data was collected from a stratified random sample of size 250 civil engineers working in various South African local municipalities. As part of the qualitative aspect of study, individual in-depth interviews were conducted with 37 civil engineers working in various local municipalities. Four focus group interviews were conducted as part of the study. Data was collected by using a structured, pretested and validated questionnaire of study. Quantitative data analyses were conducted by using methods such as frequency tables, cross-tab analyses (Pearson’s chi-square tests of associations) and binary logistic regression analysis. The results showed that 171 of the 250 respondents who took part in the study (68.40%) were satisfied with the job that they were performing in the various local municipalities, whereas the remaining 79 of the 250 respondents in the study (31.60%) were not satisfied with their jobs. Based on results obtained from cross-tab analyses at the 5% level of significance, the degree of job satisfaction of civil engineers at the workplace was significantly and adversely affected by too much workload, poor working conditions, lack of budget for construction projects, low salary and remuneration, lack of training opportunities, lack of cooperation and appreciation, too much bureaucracy and red tape, short duration of service, and poor relationship with supervisors, in a decreasing order of strength. Results obtained from binary logistic regression analysis showed that the degree of job satisfaction of civil engineers at the workplace was significantly and adversely affected by 3 factors. These 3 factors were too much workload, poor working conditions, and lack of budget for construction projects in a decreasing order of strength. Results obtained from individual and focus group in-depth interviews led to similar findings.

Evaluation of Nonlinear Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frames by Explosive Dynamic Loading Using Finite Element Method Seyed Mahdi Seyed Kolbadi; Heydar Davoodian; S.Mohamad S.Kolbadi
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

These days, due to the unpleasant spread of the threat imposed to human life by explosion, the analysis and designating of important structures such as military, governmental and fundamental, and utilities against explosive loading is not anymore a costly conservatism but an inevitable necessity. In this study, the nonlinear behavior of the fortified concrete walls by various carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) such as glass, carbon and Aramid against the load generated by the explosion wave is investigated by the use of ABAQUS finite element software. In this study, the explosive load, base conditions, wall dimensions, and the features of the material are considered to be the same. The state and the amount of distribution of destruction parameters, tension and displacement in the walls were calculated and the critical areas were identified. Other Two 2 and 4 story models were investigated to examine the frame height and different arrangements of composite fiber reinforcing polymer (CFRP). Similarly, in order to obtain more accuracy in the results, nonlinear behavioral models of concrete and nonlinear plastic damage to concrete have been applied. A 4-node Shell element was used for meshing. The results indicated that, in the reinforced model, about 30% of decrease in the base cutting power is observed, and the reduction of the values for maximum displacement and maximum stress outputs are 30 percent and 45 percent respectively.

Calculation of the Spatial Flooding Intensity with Unit Flood Response Method in the Tangrah Watershed, Iran Masoumeh Gharib; Baharak Motamedvaziri; Bagher Ghermezcheshmeh; Hasan Ahmadi
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Increased flooding in recent years indicates that most parts of the country are subjected to periodic and destructive flood attacks. Therefore, the identification of high-risk areas with potential runoff production within a watershed area is one of the most important measures in flood control and reduction of the damage caused by it. In this study, the quasi-distributional ModClark method was employed to simulate the hydrograph of flooding, and the unit flood response method was applied to determine the intensity of flooding of different areas of the Tangrah watershed, Iran. For this purpose, the ModClark model was first calibrated and verified. Thereafter, the design of rainfall with 50 and 100-year return periods ( ) was extracted at the Tangrah station and the design flood was calculated with the above-mentioned return periods. By combining the curve number layers, slope, precipitation, and flow distance, homogeneous units were obtained in terms of the flood. The effect of each homogeneous unit on the total watershed output was obtained by the removal of each unit and implementation of the rainfall-runoff model. According to the 100-year return runoff production potential, homogeneous units of 116 with a fi (0.54 m3/ s. km2) were identified as the most effective cell in the Tangrah watershed area, which could be explained by the soil type, vegetation, and other physical factors of these units.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 16

1 2

Filter by Year

2017 2017

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol. 11 No. 12 (2025): December Vol. 11 No. 11 (2025): November Vol. 11 No. 10 (2025): October Vol. 11 No. 9 (2025): September Vol. 11 No. 8 (2025): August Vol. 11 No. 7 (2025): July Vol. 11 No. 6 (2025): June Vol. 11 No. 5 (2025): May Vol 11, No 3 (2025): March Vol 11, No 2 (2025): February Vol 11, No 1 (2025): January Vol 10, No 12 (2024): December Vol 10, No 11 (2024): November Vol. 10 No. 11 (2024): November Vol 10, No 10 (2024): October Vol 10, No 9 (2024): September Vol 10, No 8 (2024): August Vol 10, No 7 (2024): July Vol. 10 No. 7 (2024): July Vol 10, No 6 (2024): June Vol 10, No 5 (2024): May Vol. 10 No. 5 (2024): May Vol 10, No 4 (2024): April Vol 10, No 3 (2024): March Vol 10, No 2 (2024): February Vol 10, No 1 (2024): January Vol 10 (2024): Special Issue "Sustainable Infrastructure and Structural Engineering: Innovations in Vol 9, No 12 (2023): December Vol 9, No 11 (2023): November Vol 9, No 10 (2023): October Vol 9, No 9 (2023): September Vol 9, No 8 (2023): August Vol 9, No 7 (2023): July Vol 9, No 6 (2023): June Vol 9, No 5 (2023): May Vol 9, No 4 (2023): April Vol 9, No 3 (2023): March Vol 9, No 2 (2023): February Vol 9, No 1 (2023): January Vol 9 (2023): Special Issue "Innovative Strategies in Civil Engineering Grand Challenges" Vol 8, No 12 (2022): December Vol 8, No 11 (2022): November Vol 8, No 10 (2022): October Vol 8, No 9 (2022): September Vol 8, No 8 (2022): August Vol 8, No 7 (2022): July Vol 8, No 6 (2022): June Vol 8, No 5 (2022): May Vol 8, No 4 (2022): April Vol 8, No 3 (2022): March Vol 8, No 2 (2022): February Vol 8, No 1 (2022): January Vol 7, No 12 (2021): December Vol 7, No 11 (2021): November Vol 7, No 10 (2021): October Vol 7, No 9 (2021): September Vol 7, No 8 (2021): August Vol 7, No 7 (2021): July Vol 7, No 6 (2021): June Vol 7, No 5 (2021): May Vol 7, No 4 (2021): April Vol 7, No 3 (2021): March Vol 7, No 2 (2021): February Vol 7, No 1 (2021): January Vol 7 (2021): Special Issue "Innovative Strategies in Civil Engineering Grand Challenges" Vol 6, No 12 (2020): December Vol 6, No 11 (2020): November Vol 6, No 10 (2020): October Vol 6, No 9 (2020): September Vol 6, No 8 (2020): August Vol 6, No 7 (2020): July Vol 6, No 6 (2020): June Vol 6, No 5 (2020): May Vol 6, No 4 (2020): April Vol 6, No 3 (2020): March Vol 6, No 2 (2020): February Vol 6, No 1 (2020): January Vol 6 (2020): Special Issue "Emerging Materials in Civil Engineering" Vol 5, No 12 (2019): December Vol 5, No 11 (2019): November Vol 5, No 10 (2019): October Vol 5, No 9 (2019): September Vol 5, No 8 (2019): August Vol 5, No 7 (2019): July Vol 5, No 6 (2019): June Vol 5, No 6 (2019): June Vol 5, No 5 (2019): May Vol 5, No 4 (2019): April Vol 5, No 4 (2019): April Vol 5, No 3 (2019): March Vol 5, No 3 (2019): March Vol 5, No 2 (2019): February Vol 5, No 2 (2019): February Vol 5, No 1 (2019): January Vol 5, No 1 (2019): January Vol 4, No 12 (2018): December Vol 4, No 12 (2018): December Vol 4, No 11 (2018): November Vol 4, No 11 (2018): November Vol 4, No 10 (2018): October Vol 4, No 10 (2018): October Vol 4, No 9 (2018): September Vol 4, No 9 (2018): September Vol 4, No 8 (2018): August Vol 4, No 8 (2018): August Vol 4, No 7 (2018): July Vol 4, No 7 (2018): July Vol 4, No 6 (2018): June Vol 4, No 6 (2018): June Vol 4, No 5 (2018): May Vol 4, No 5 (2018): May Vol 4, No 4 (2018): April Vol 4, No 4 (2018): April Vol 4, No 3 (2018): March Vol 4, No 3 (2018): March Vol 4, No 2 (2018): February Vol 4, No 2 (2018): February Vol 4, No 1 (2018): January Vol 4, No 1 (2018): January Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December Vol 3, No 11 (2017): November Vol 3, No 11 (2017): November Vol 3, No 10 (2017): October Vol 3, No 10 (2017): October Vol 3, No 9 (2017): September Vol 3, No 9 (2017): September Vol 3, No 8 (2017): August Vol 3, No 7 (2017): July Vol 3, No 7 (2017): July Vol 3, No 6 (2017): June Vol 3, No 5 (2017): May Vol 3, No 5 (2017): May Vol 3, No 4 (2017): April Vol 3, No 3 (2017): March Vol 3, No 2 (2017): February Vol 3, No 2 (2017): February Vol 3, No 1 (2017): January Vol 2, No 12 (2016): December Vol 2, No 12 (2016): December Vol 2, No 11 (2016): November Vol 2, No 11 (2016): November Vol 2, No 10 (2016): October Vol 2, No 9 (2016): September Vol 2, No 9 (2016): September Vol 2, No 8 (2016): August Vol 2, No 8 (2016): August Vol 2, No 7 (2016): July Vol 2, No 7 (2016): July Vol 2, No 6 (2016): June Vol 2, No 6 (2016): June Vol 2, No 5 (2016): May Vol 2, No 4 (2016): April Vol 2, No 3 (2016): March Vol 2, No 3 (2016): March Vol 2, No 2 (2016): February Vol 2, No 1 (2016): January Vol 1, No 2 (2015): December Vol 1, No 1 (2015): November More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
-

Editorial Address
-

Location
,

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name -

Contact Email -

Phone -

Journal Mail Official -

Editorial Address -

Location , INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
-

Editorial Address
-

Location
,

INDONESIA