cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
,
INDONESIA
Civil Engineering Journal
Published by C.E.J Publishing Group
ISSN : 24763055     EISSN : 24763055     DOI : -
Core Subject : Engineering,
Civil Engineering Journal is a multidisciplinary, an open-access, internationally double-blind peer -reviewed journal concerned with all aspects of civil engineering, which include but are not necessarily restricted to: Building Materials and Structures, Coastal and Harbor Engineering, Constructions Technology, Constructions Management, Road and Bridge Engineering, Renovation of Buildings, Earthquake Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Geotechnical Engineering, Highway Engineering, Hydraulic and Hydraulic Structures, Structural Engineering, Surveying and Geo-Spatial Engineering, Transportation Engineering, Tunnel Engineering, Urban Engineering and Economy, Water Resources Engineering, Urban Drainage.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 18 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 5, No 7 (2019): July" : 18 Documents clear
Design Changes in Construction Projects – Causes and Impact on the Cost Mughees Aslam; Edmund Baffoe-Twum; Farhan Saleem
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 5, No 7 (2019): July
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/cej-2019-03091360

Abstract

Isolation of design phase from construction has made the design changes inevitable in construction projects. Extensive literature appraisal has acknowledged the detrimental effect of design changes on project performances. However, the impact and causes of design changes have been divided up, either separately or project specific. As a result, the relationship between impact and causes of design changes could not be established for general construction. The primary objective of this paper is to examine the impact of design changes on project cost and identifying actions responsible for these changes. The objectives of the study were achieved through a systematic review of past literature published in well-established journals, and contents analyzed. From the extensive literature review, it was established that the design change is one of the predominant factors to cost overrun, and in some cases, may upshot into cost overrun between 5 and 40% of the project cost. Also, many causes of design changes resulting in cost overrun within the perspective of the owner, consultant, and contractors are explored. Some projects experienced closure as a result of owner induced design changes, although these changes may not be significant in number.  Design changes as a result of consultants and contractors in some cases might have reduced impact but are frequent. For each consideration, most events leading to design changes can be eliminated by improving on communication and coordination between stakeholders. The main contribution of this research is to bring together the impact and causes of design changes on cost under one platform for effectively managing the design process.
INVESTIGATION OF HIGH-VELOCITY PROJECTILE PENETRATING CONCRETE BLOCKS REINFORCED BY LAYERS OF HIGH TOUGHNESS AND ENERGY ABSORPTION MATERIALS Elhozayen, Aya; Laissy, Mohamed Y.; Attia, Walid A.
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 5, No 7 (2019): July
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/cej-2019-03091349

Abstract

Recently, the need to protect people and structures against attacks of terrorists are of a high increase. The main objective of this paper is to enhance the concrete resistance against ballistic impact of high velocity projectile by using different combination layers from different materials as reinforcement for concrete and investigate their effect on the penetration depth of projectile and the resulted damage of concrete. The investigation presents the development of a finite element accurate models using AUTODYN 3D. The Lagrangian formulation numerical techniques is used to model the projectile and concrete target. The investigated models are reinforced using different layers combinations of several materials such as ceramics, fiber composite, polymer and metal: (AL2O3 - 99.7% and Kevlar- epoxy, Teflon and aluminum alloy 6061-T6) .Those materials were chosen because of their high thermal shock resistance or their great capability in energy absorption. The main findings showed a significant enhancement in the reduction of penetration depth compared to the concrete resistance without reinforcement, which demonstrate the great performance of the used combinations in the shock wave propagation. Hence from the findings of this work we can say that the concrete reinforced by ceramics or aluminum alloy with fiber composite or polymer can be used for several applications as it represents a successful anti-penetration composite structure.
IDENTIFICATION OF CRACK IN REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM SUBJECTED TO STATIC LOAD USING NON-LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS Halahla, Abdulsamee M.
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 5, No 7 (2019): July
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/cej-2019-03091359

Abstract

Experimental testing was used widely as a means to investigate the behavior of these individual elements and the effects of concrete strength under different loading types. While this method represents real life responses, it is very time consuming and the use of materials can be quite costly. Recently, the use of finite element analysis (FEA) has increased due to advances in knowledge and the capabilities of computer hardware and software. The utilization of computer software to model the structural elements has become much faster and extremely cost-effective. The finite element software ANSYS 11.0 is used for modeling and analysis by conducting non-linear static analysis. This research work used nonlinear finite element analysis for a reinforced concrete beam in order to show the potential of the FEA for studying the behavior of reinforced concrete elements, and to understand their load-deflection response along with the crack evolution. For concrete a solid 65 element was used, while for the reinforcement steel bar link 8 elements were used. For the material constitutive model linear and multi-linear behavior for concrete were considered, while linear and bilinear behavior were considered for the reinforcement bar.  A reinforced concrete beam model is studied and compared with experimental data from the literature. The characteristic points on the load-deflection response curve predicted using finite element analysis, were compared to the theoretical limit (hand-calculated) results. Conclusions were then drawn as to the accuracy of using finite element modeling for the analysis of reinforced concrete elements. The results showed a good match to experimental and hand calculations.
Simplified Irregular Beam Analysis and Design Mohammed Salem Al-Ansari; Muhammad Shekaib Afzal
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 5, No 7 (2019): July
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/cej-2019-03091354

Abstract

This paper presents simple method to estimate the strength design of reinforced concrete beam sections based on structural safety and reliability. Irregular beam shaped sections are commonly used nowadays in the construction industry. This study reveals the simplified method to analyze and design the different irregular shaped beam sections. In this study, the selected irregular beam shaped sections are divided mainly into three groups, beams with straight edges, beams with sloped edges and circular beams. Each group contains the most commonly used beam shaped sections in that category. Six beams sections (B-1 to B-6) are selected for group-1 whereas five beam sections (B-7 to B-11) and a circular beam section (B-12) are chosen for group 2 and 3 respectively. Flexural beam formulas for three groups of reinforced concrete beams are derived based on section geometry and ACI building code of design. This study also analyzed numerical examples for some of the sections in each group category using the proposed simplified method to determine the strength design of the irregular beams. The results obtained using simplified method for all of the three groups are compared with the finite element software (SAP v2000). The percentage difference of simplified method with the finite element software ranges within 5% to 10%. This makes the simplified method for irregular shaped beam sections quite promising.
Comparative Analysis of Settlement and Pore Water Pressure of Road Embankment on Yan soft soil Treated with PVDs Rufaizal Che Mamat; Anuar Kasa; Siti Fatin Mohd Razali
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 5, No 7 (2019): July
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/cej-2019-03091357

Abstract

The application of prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs) in the road embankment construction has been successfully performed in many projects throughout the country. The simulation of finite element method (FEM) can assist engineers in modelling very complex structures and foundations. This paper presents a plane–strain numerical analysis that was performed to verify the effectiveness of the model embankment stabilised with PVD using Plaxis 2D version 8. This study employed the smear effect of permeability ratio (kr) of 3 in the PVD modelling. The data of settlement and pore water pressure in the left and right sides of road embankment were monitored for 177 days, then the data were collected and compared by a numerical simulation. The coefficient of determination (R2) was used to assess the performance of the comparative analysis. The results of numerical simulation on settlement and pore water pressure obtained a coefficient of determination of greater than 0.9 which has reached a good agreement with those of the field measurement. On other the hand, there was no significant difference in the performance between both sides of the embankment. The smear effect parameter (kr = 3) is recommended for PVD designs and can provide accurate FEM prediction.
The Timber Floor Seismic Design by Means Finite Element Method Abdoullah Namdar; Shan Saimai
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 5, No 7 (2019): July
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/cej-2019-03091352

Abstract

To improve accuracy results of numerical analysis, the finite element method software needs to use appropriately with considering accurate input data. Among several factors in realistic and economical seismic structural design, the damping ratio needs to be investigated as a calculated and input data in numerical analysis. In the present study, the effect of accurate damping ratio on timber floor seismic design has numerically been examined. The 6 first modes from a series of eigenvalues were selected to calculate natural frequency and damping ratio. The seismic results with and without applied calculated damping ratio were compared. The strain, displacement, and seismic load response are interpreted. The numerical analysis results were showed that the higher nonlinear displacement occurs in timber floor when the damping ratio was modified in numerical modeling. It was found that the floor seismic design is more critical compared to a column in select accurate damping ratio. The damping ratio has highly effect on timber floor seismic design.
Durability of Mortars Modified with Calcined Montmorillonite Clay Safi Ur Rehman; Muhammad Yaqub; Tariq Ali; Khan Shahzada; Sajjad Wali Khan; Muhammad Noman
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 5, No 7 (2019): July
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/cej-2019-03091347

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the performance of mortars containing locally available Pakistani montmorillonite (Mmt) clay mineral as partial replacement of cement in various curing environments. The local montmorillonite clay in “As is” (20°C) and “heated” (100°C, 200°C, 300°C, 400°C, 500°C, 600°C, 700°C, 800°C, 900°C & 1000°C) conditions was incorporated in mortar cubes as partial replacement of cement. Montmorillonite clay of all the temperatures was replaced by 15%, 20%, 25%, 30% and 35% of cement mass in mortar cubes. The Strength Activity Index (SAI) was calculated to determine the optimum activation temperature for the clay. Compressive strengths of the controlled mix and montmorillonite modified mortars were evaluated under the Sodium Sulfate (SS) (5% solution) and mixed (Sodium Sulfate + Sodium Chloride (SCS)) (5% +3.5% solution) curing environments to study its durability performance. Upon thermal treatment montmorillonite clay showed maximum activation at 800°C temperature. Mortar containing (800°C) calcined montmorillonite clay with 25% cement replacement exhibit competent compression results. Moreover, up on exposure to aggressive environments, montmorillonite clay mortars performed better than the control samples. The mortar cubes exposed to Sulfate environment (SS) were more damaged in compression than that exposed to mixed environment (SCS), for all replacement levels and time exposures.
Effect of Semi-Rigid Connection on Post-Buckling Behaviour of Frames Using Finite Element Method Douaa Raheem Mohammed; Murtada A. Ismael
Civil Engineering Journal Vol 5, No 7 (2019): July
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/cej-2019-03091358

Abstract

It is very important task to estimate the post buckling for structures that have slender elements, since post-buckling state means loss the structures stability related with large displacement and that lead to demolition the structures. On the other hand, in the design and analysis of steel frame, the beam-columns connection is assumed perfect pin or fully rigid, this assumption leads to incorrect estimation of the structural behaviour. Practically, beam-column connection is between these two assumptions and this type of connection is called semi-rigid. This study presents a numerical analysis using finite element method to investigate the effect of semi-rigid connections on post-buckling behaviour of two-dimensional frames with different supporting types and different lateral loading cases. The semi-rigid connections are modelled as rotational spring in linear elastic stage, using COMBIN14 element which has rotational stiffness value.  The numerical results showed that; the effect of changing the beam-column connections from rigid to semi rigid for toggle frame with rotational joint stiffness 25EI/L to 15EI/L and 10EI/L led to decrease the initial peak load of the frames of fixed-fixed supports with percentages 3.36 %, 5.6% and 8.95% respectively as compared with that of the rigid connection frame, While, the frames with fixed-pin and pin-pin supports cases did not affected by this changing. The fixed-fixed support case is more affected by changing the joint stiffness from other cases and the effect of changing the joint stiffness in pin-pin support model is less significant from others. This can be attributed to that, the fixed-fixed supports is restrained in all degree of freedom and will be affected by any rotation and presence the pin in other cases makes the frame less affected by the rotation of semi-rigid connection. The effect of changing the beam-column connection from rigid to semi rigid decreases with presence the lateral load. Thus, the semi-rigid connection should be considered in analysis and design of steel frames to obtain more realistic results.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 18


Filter by Year

2019 2019


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): January Vol. 11 No. 12 (2025): December Vol. 11 No. 11 (2025): November Vol. 11 No. 10 (2025): October Vol. 11 No. 9 (2025): September Vol. 11 No. 8 (2025): August Vol. 11 No. 7 (2025): July Vol. 11 No. 6 (2025): June Vol. 11 No. 5 (2025): May Vol 11, No 3 (2025): March Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): March Vol 11, No 2 (2025): February Vol 11, No 1 (2025): January Vol 10, No 12 (2024): December Vol 10, No 11 (2024): November Vol. 10 No. 11 (2024): November Vol 10, No 10 (2024): October Vol 10, No 9 (2024): September Vol 10, No 8 (2024): August Vol 10, No 7 (2024): July Vol. 10 No. 7 (2024): July Vol 10, No 6 (2024): June Vol. 10 No. 5 (2024): May Vol 10, No 5 (2024): May Vol 10, No 4 (2024): April Vol 10, No 3 (2024): March Vol 10, No 2 (2024): February Vol 10, No 1 (2024): January Vol 10 (2024): Special Issue "Sustainable Infrastructure and Structural Engineering: Innovations in Vol 9, No 12 (2023): December Vol 9, No 11 (2023): November Vol 9, No 10 (2023): October Vol 9, No 9 (2023): September Vol 9, No 8 (2023): August Vol 9, No 7 (2023): July Vol 9, No 6 (2023): June Vol 9, No 5 (2023): May Vol 9, No 4 (2023): April Vol 9, No 3 (2023): March Vol 9, No 2 (2023): February Vol 9, No 1 (2023): January Vol 9 (2023): Special Issue "Innovative Strategies in Civil Engineering Grand Challenges" Vol 8, No 12 (2022): December Vol 8, No 11 (2022): November Vol 8, No 10 (2022): October Vol 8, No 9 (2022): September Vol 8, No 8 (2022): August Vol 8, No 7 (2022): July Vol 8, No 6 (2022): June Vol 8, No 5 (2022): May Vol 8, No 4 (2022): April Vol 8, No 3 (2022): March Vol 8, No 2 (2022): February Vol 8, No 1 (2022): January Vol 7, No 12 (2021): December Vol 7, No 11 (2021): November Vol 7, No 10 (2021): October Vol 7, No 9 (2021): September Vol 7, No 8 (2021): August Vol 7, No 7 (2021): July Vol 7, No 6 (2021): June Vol 7, No 5 (2021): May Vol 7, No 4 (2021): April Vol 7, No 3 (2021): March Vol 7, No 2 (2021): February Vol 7, No 1 (2021): January Vol 7 (2021): Special Issue "Innovative Strategies in Civil Engineering Grand Challenges" Vol 6, No 12 (2020): December Vol 6, No 11 (2020): November Vol 6, No 10 (2020): October Vol 6, No 9 (2020): September Vol 6, No 8 (2020): August Vol 6, No 7 (2020): July Vol 6, No 6 (2020): June Vol 6, No 5 (2020): May Vol 6, No 4 (2020): April Vol 6, No 3 (2020): March Vol 6, No 2 (2020): February Vol 6, No 1 (2020): January Vol 6 (2020): Special Issue "Emerging Materials in Civil Engineering" Vol 5, No 12 (2019): December Vol 5, No 11 (2019): November Vol 5, No 10 (2019): October Vol 5, No 9 (2019): September Vol 5, No 8 (2019): August Vol 5, No 7 (2019): July Vol 5, No 6 (2019): June Vol 5, No 6 (2019): June Vol 5, No 5 (2019): May Vol 5, No 4 (2019): April Vol 5, No 4 (2019): April Vol 5, No 3 (2019): March Vol 5, No 3 (2019): March Vol 5, No 2 (2019): February Vol 5, No 2 (2019): February Vol 5, No 1 (2019): January Vol 5, No 1 (2019): January Vol 4, No 12 (2018): December Vol 4, No 12 (2018): December Vol 4, No 11 (2018): November Vol 4, No 11 (2018): November Vol 4, No 10 (2018): October Vol 4, No 10 (2018): October Vol 4, No 9 (2018): September Vol 4, No 9 (2018): September Vol 4, No 8 (2018): August Vol 4, No 8 (2018): August Vol 4, No 7 (2018): July Vol 4, No 7 (2018): July Vol 4, No 6 (2018): June Vol 4, No 6 (2018): June Vol 4, No 5 (2018): May Vol 4, No 5 (2018): May Vol 4, No 4 (2018): April Vol 4, No 4 (2018): April Vol 4, No 3 (2018): March Vol 4, No 3 (2018): March Vol 4, No 2 (2018): February Vol 4, No 2 (2018): February Vol 4, No 1 (2018): January Vol 4, No 1 (2018): January Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December Vol 3, No 11 (2017): November Vol 3, No 11 (2017): November Vol 3, No 10 (2017): October Vol 3, No 10 (2017): October Vol 3, No 9 (2017): September Vol 3, No 9 (2017): September Vol 3, No 8 (2017): August Vol 3, No 7 (2017): July Vol 3, No 7 (2017): July Vol 3, No 6 (2017): June Vol 3, No 5 (2017): May Vol 3, No 5 (2017): May Vol 3, No 4 (2017): April Vol 3, No 3 (2017): March Vol 3, No 2 (2017): February Vol 3, No 2 (2017): February Vol 3, No 1 (2017): January Vol 2, No 12 (2016): December Vol 2, No 12 (2016): December Vol 2, No 11 (2016): November Vol 2, No 11 (2016): November Vol 2, No 10 (2016): October Vol 2, No 9 (2016): September Vol 2, No 9 (2016): September Vol 2, No 8 (2016): August Vol 2, No 8 (2016): August Vol 2, No 7 (2016): July Vol 2, No 7 (2016): July Vol 2, No 6 (2016): June Vol 2, No 6 (2016): June Vol 2, No 5 (2016): May Vol 2, No 4 (2016): April Vol 2, No 3 (2016): March Vol 2, No 3 (2016): March Vol 2, No 2 (2016): February Vol 2, No 1 (2016): January Vol 1, No 2 (2015): December Vol 1, No 1 (2015): November More Issue