cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
,
INDONESIA
Civil Engineering Journal
Published by C.E.J Publishing Group
ISSN : 24763055     EISSN : 24763055     DOI : -
Core Subject : Engineering,
Civil Engineering Journal is a multidisciplinary, an open-access, internationally double-blind peer -reviewed journal concerned with all aspects of civil engineering, which include but are not necessarily restricted to: Building Materials and Structures, Coastal and Harbor Engineering, Constructions Technology, Constructions Management, Road and Bridge Engineering, Renovation of Buildings, Earthquake Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Geotechnical Engineering, Highway Engineering, Hydraulic and Hydraulic Structures, Structural Engineering, Surveying and Geo-Spatial Engineering, Transportation Engineering, Tunnel Engineering, Urban Engineering and Economy, Water Resources Engineering, Urban Drainage.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 24 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): January" : 24 Documents clear
Thermo-Economic Optimization and Life Cycle Analysis of Bio-Limestone Bricks Enriched with Eggshells for Buildings Lajimi, Nour; Helel, Dalel; Boukadida, Noureddine
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-2026-012-01-024

Abstract

Tunisia is confronted with dual challenges in its energy transition and the management of organic waste, where eggshells constitute a significant yet underutilized resource, with an annual production approximating 50,000 tons. This study presents an integrated thermo-economic and environmental assessment of bio-limestone bricks incorporating eggshell waste, addressing critical gaps in sustainable construction research. The primary objectives are to present the thermophysical properties of these innovative bricks, evaluate their energy performance at the building scale through dynamic simulation, and quantify their economic viability and environmental benefits. Using dynamic thermal simulation with TRNSYS software validated by analytical solutions for a building in a Mediterranean climate. The methodology combines energy modeling with detailed economic analysis and life cycle assessment to provide a holistic evaluation framework. Key findings reveal that bricks with 20% eggshell content reduce cooling loads by 50.9% (2648 W vs. 5400 W for conventional bricks), achieve annual energy savings of 81.5 TND with a favorable 1.23-year payback period, and reduce CO₂ emissions by 51%. The originality of this work lies in a complete energy and economic simulation and a simplified environmental assessment for building materials enriched with eggshells, providing both waste recovery strategies and energy efficiency of buildings in hot climates.
Assessment of Red Sea Shoreline Dynamics Through Satellite Imagery and GIS Analysis Abdel Aziz, Khaled Mahmoud
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-2026-012-01-09

Abstract

Monitoring and analyzing coastal dynamics is essential due to continuous shoreline changes driven by natural processes and human activities with significant environmental and economic impacts. This study aims to quantitatively assess shoreline change along the Red Sea coast using integrated remote sensing and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) techniques. Multi-temporal satellite imagery from 1980 to 2025 was processed to extract shoreline positions, and shoreline change rates were calculated using the EPR method to determine patterns of erosion and accretion. The study area extends along the northwestern part of Saudi Arabia within the Tabuk region, covering Wadi al Ayn, NEOM Port, and the villages of Al Muwaylih, As Sawrah, Sharma, Al Khuraybah, and Qiyal. The results reveal that erosion rates exceed accretion rates across most shoreline segments during the study period. The average EPR of accretion reached 1.13 m/yr, while erosion recorded a higher magnitude with an average rate of −1.99 m/yr. Spatial analysis showed a total accretion area of 1.634 km² compared to a substantially larger erosion area of 19.624 km². This study lies in providing a comprehensive, long-term spatiotemporal assessment of shoreline dynamics using consistent satellite-based measurements, contributing updated baseline data for coastal management and sustainable development planning in the Red Sea region.
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Carbon Fiber and Nano-Silica Modified Asphalt Mixtures Sabry, Marwa; Abdelsalam , Moustafa; Gamal , Ahmed; Eisa, Mohamed S.
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-2026-012-01-022

Abstract

In recent years, several studies have focused on enhancing the performance of asphalt mixtures using various additives; however, the environmental implications of these modifications have received limited attention. Accordingly, this study aims to evaluate the environmental impacts of asphalt mixtures incorporating carbon fiber (CF) and nano silica (NS) using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. In the current study, four mixtures were modelled and analyzed using SimaPro software: conventional asphalt mix (CAM), carbon fiber asphalt mix (CFAM), nano silica asphalt mix (NSAM), and carbon fiber–nano silica asphalt mix (CFNSAM). The assessment included the production cycle from raw material extraction to wearing surface installation, integrating laboratory performance data with the Ecoinvent v3.6 inventory. Results indicated that CAM exhibited the lowest environmental burden, whereas CFNSAM showed the highest impact resulting from the considerable energy inputs associated with carbon fiber fabrication. NSAM offered a balanced outcome, with moderate environmental impacts and satisfactory mechanical performance, positioning it as a more sustainable alternative. Overall, nano silica modification demonstrates promising potential for eco-efficient pavement applications.
Shear Behavior of Small-Scale Continuous Hidden Beams Using Tied and Spiral Stirrups Ahmed , Mostafa; Ekaputri, Januarti J.; Abdalla , Hany; Elgamal , Ahmed; Youssef , Ahmed
Civil Engineering Journal Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Salehan Institute of Higher Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/CEJ-2026-012-01-06

Abstract

Hidden beams in reinforced concrete (RC) structures are widely used to meet architectural requirements; however, their reduced effective depth limits shear capacity. This study investigates the shear behavior of hidden beams reinforced with innovative rectangular staggered continuous spiral stirrups, addressing the absence of design guidelines for such reinforcement systems. Nine one-eighth-scale continuous beams were tested under two-point loading, with mortar used to reduce scale effects. The influence of the number, geometry, and configuration of spiral reinforcement was investigated. Both conventional and spiral stirrups significantly improved shear performance compared to the reference beam without transverse reinforcement (HB9-No). Beams with normal stirrups (HB1-N20, HB2-N30, HB3-N40, HB4-N50) increased shear capacity by 115%, 82%, 23%, and 4%, while spiral stirrup beams (HB1-S20, HB2-S30, HB3-S40, HB4-S50) achieved corresponding increases of 174%, 144%, 73%, and 27%, respectively. Overall, spiral reinforcement enhanced shear capacity and energy dissipation by approximately 30% and 46%, respectively, compared with conventional stirrups. Prototype capacities estimated using scaling relationships were compared with international design codes, which were found to be conservative. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of spiral stirrups in improving shear strength and ductility and emphasize the need to include their contribution in future shear design equations for hidden beams.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 24


Filter by Year

2026 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): January Vol. 11 No. 12 (2025): December Vol. 11 No. 11 (2025): November Vol. 11 No. 10 (2025): October Vol. 11 No. 9 (2025): September Vol. 11 No. 8 (2025): August Vol. 11 No. 7 (2025): July Vol. 11 No. 6 (2025): June Vol. 11 No. 5 (2025): May Vol. 11 No. 3 (2025): March Vol 11, No 3 (2025): March Vol 11, No 2 (2025): February Vol 11, No 1 (2025): January Vol 10, No 12 (2024): December Vol 10, No 11 (2024): November Vol. 10 No. 11 (2024): November Vol 10, No 10 (2024): October Vol 10, No 9 (2024): September Vol 10, No 8 (2024): August Vol 10, No 7 (2024): July Vol. 10 No. 7 (2024): July Vol 10, No 6 (2024): June Vol 10, No 5 (2024): May Vol. 10 No. 5 (2024): May Vol 10, No 4 (2024): April Vol 10, No 3 (2024): March Vol 10, No 2 (2024): February Vol 10, No 1 (2024): January Vol 10 (2024): Special Issue "Sustainable Infrastructure and Structural Engineering: Innovations in Vol 9, No 12 (2023): December Vol 9, No 11 (2023): November Vol 9, No 10 (2023): October Vol 9, No 9 (2023): September Vol 9, No 8 (2023): August Vol 9, No 7 (2023): July Vol 9, No 6 (2023): June Vol 9, No 5 (2023): May Vol 9, No 4 (2023): April Vol 9, No 3 (2023): March Vol 9, No 2 (2023): February Vol 9, No 1 (2023): January Vol 9 (2023): Special Issue "Innovative Strategies in Civil Engineering Grand Challenges" Vol 8, No 12 (2022): December Vol 8, No 11 (2022): November Vol 8, No 10 (2022): October Vol 8, No 9 (2022): September Vol 8, No 8 (2022): August Vol 8, No 7 (2022): July Vol 8, No 6 (2022): June Vol 8, No 5 (2022): May Vol 8, No 4 (2022): April Vol 8, No 3 (2022): March Vol 8, No 2 (2022): February Vol 8, No 1 (2022): January Vol 7, No 12 (2021): December Vol 7, No 11 (2021): November Vol 7, No 10 (2021): October Vol 7, No 9 (2021): September Vol 7, No 8 (2021): August Vol 7, No 7 (2021): July Vol 7, No 6 (2021): June Vol 7, No 5 (2021): May Vol 7, No 4 (2021): April Vol 7, No 3 (2021): March Vol 7, No 2 (2021): February Vol 7, No 1 (2021): January Vol 7 (2021): Special Issue "Innovative Strategies in Civil Engineering Grand Challenges" Vol 6, No 12 (2020): December Vol 6, No 11 (2020): November Vol 6, No 10 (2020): October Vol 6, No 9 (2020): September Vol 6, No 8 (2020): August Vol 6, No 7 (2020): July Vol 6, No 6 (2020): June Vol 6, No 5 (2020): May Vol 6, No 4 (2020): April Vol 6, No 3 (2020): March Vol 6, No 2 (2020): February Vol 6, No 1 (2020): January Vol 6 (2020): Special Issue "Emerging Materials in Civil Engineering" Vol 5, No 12 (2019): December Vol 5, No 11 (2019): November Vol 5, No 10 (2019): October Vol 5, No 9 (2019): September Vol 5, No 8 (2019): August Vol 5, No 7 (2019): July Vol 5, No 6 (2019): June Vol 5, No 6 (2019): June Vol 5, No 5 (2019): May Vol 5, No 4 (2019): April Vol 5, No 4 (2019): April Vol 5, No 3 (2019): March Vol 5, No 3 (2019): March Vol 5, No 2 (2019): February Vol 5, No 2 (2019): February Vol 5, No 1 (2019): January Vol 5, No 1 (2019): January Vol 4, No 12 (2018): December Vol 4, No 12 (2018): December Vol 4, No 11 (2018): November Vol 4, No 11 (2018): November Vol 4, No 10 (2018): October Vol 4, No 10 (2018): October Vol 4, No 9 (2018): September Vol 4, No 9 (2018): September Vol 4, No 8 (2018): August Vol 4, No 8 (2018): August Vol 4, No 7 (2018): July Vol 4, No 7 (2018): July Vol 4, No 6 (2018): June Vol 4, No 6 (2018): June Vol 4, No 5 (2018): May Vol 4, No 5 (2018): May Vol 4, No 4 (2018): April Vol 4, No 4 (2018): April Vol 4, No 3 (2018): March Vol 4, No 3 (2018): March Vol 4, No 2 (2018): February Vol 4, No 2 (2018): February Vol 4, No 1 (2018): January Vol 4, No 1 (2018): January Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December Vol 3, No 12 (2017): December Vol 3, No 11 (2017): November Vol 3, No 11 (2017): November Vol 3, No 10 (2017): October Vol 3, No 10 (2017): October Vol 3, No 9 (2017): September Vol 3, No 9 (2017): September Vol 3, No 8 (2017): August Vol 3, No 7 (2017): July Vol 3, No 7 (2017): July Vol 3, No 6 (2017): June Vol 3, No 5 (2017): May Vol 3, No 5 (2017): May Vol 3, No 4 (2017): April Vol 3, No 3 (2017): March Vol 3, No 2 (2017): February Vol 3, No 2 (2017): February Vol 3, No 1 (2017): January Vol 2, No 12 (2016): December Vol 2, No 12 (2016): December Vol 2, No 11 (2016): November Vol 2, No 11 (2016): November Vol 2, No 10 (2016): October Vol 2, No 9 (2016): September Vol 2, No 9 (2016): September Vol 2, No 8 (2016): August Vol 2, No 8 (2016): August Vol 2, No 7 (2016): July Vol 2, No 7 (2016): July Vol 2, No 6 (2016): June Vol 2, No 6 (2016): June Vol 2, No 5 (2016): May Vol 2, No 4 (2016): April Vol 2, No 3 (2016): March Vol 2, No 3 (2016): March Vol 2, No 2 (2016): February Vol 2, No 1 (2016): January Vol 1, No 2 (2015): December Vol 1, No 1 (2015): November More Issue