cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Pan Mohamad Faiz
Contact Email
Pan Mohamad Faiz
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
consrev@mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Constitutional Review
Published by Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
ISSN : 24600016     EISSN : 25483870     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Constitutional Review is a law journal published by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia twice a year. The primary purpose of this journal is to disseminate research, conceptual analysis and other writings of scientific nature on constitutional issues. Articles published cover various topics on constitutions, constitutional courts, constitutional court decisions and issues on constitutional law either in Indonesia or other countries all over the world. This journal is designed to be an international law journal and intended as a forum for legal scholarship which discusses ideas and insights from law professors, legal scholars, judges and practitioners.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 5, No 1 (2019)" : 12 Documents clear
The Malaysian Federal Constitution: An Islamic or a Secular Constitution? Syed Fadhil Hanafi Syed A. Rahman
Constitutional Review Vol 5, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (304.118 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/consrev515

Abstract

Constitutionalism dictates that the government must only act within the four walls of the constitution. While adherence to this fundamental doctrine is proven to be difficult, it becomes more complicated when the walls are unclear. For decades, Malaysians struggle to ascertain the actual legal value of religion, particularly Islam, in its Federal Constitution and the impact of religion to the Malaysian legal system. Some opined that secularism is a basic structure of the Malaysian Federal Constitution and in the name of constitutionalism, religious laws cannot be the basis for administration of public law and must be confined to personal law matters. On the other hand, some opined that Islam constitutes a salient feature of the Constitution and the position of Islam as the religion of the Federation implies Malaysia as an Islamic state. This paper analyses the conflicting views, via qualitative studies of constitutional provisions which have religious element in the light of their history, together with relevant case laws which interpreted them. The analysis is done with a view to determine whether the Malaysian Federal Constitution is a secular instrument creating a secular state or a religious document establishing a theocratic state. From such analysis, the author presents that the Malaysian Federal Constitution, albeit giving special preference to Islam, is a religion-neutral document which is receptive to both religious and secular laws. This is based on the fact that the Constitution upholds the validity of both secular and religious laws for as long as they are enacted according to procedural laws required by the Constitution.
The Return of Pancasila: Political and Legal Rhetoric Against Transnational Islamist Imposition Yance Arizona
Constitutional Review Vol 5, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (356.73 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/consrev516

Abstract

The rise of transnational Islamist movements in Indonesia in the last two decades recurrences the old debate between Pancasila and Islamism. This kind of fundamental Islamic movements widespread with their conservative view and it has had detrimental effects on the Indonesian society’s social cohesion. President Joko Widodo seeks to revive Pancasila to confront this threat. This is not for the first time Pancasila is used by the Indonesian government to resolve the tension between Islamic values and nation-state principles. Both President Sukarno and Suharto also used Pancasila as a vehicle to discipline their political opponents. Adopting a non-essentialist approach to Pancasila, I argue that the return of Pancasila in recent years would be more complicated because of the narrative of Pancasila revivalism as an adversarial ideology is bounded by traditionalism and lack of progressive interpretation. Instead of locating Pancasila as the counterpart to Islamism, what is needed is re-interpretation of Pancasila as a unifying ideology.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024) Vol 8, No 2 (2022) Vol 8, No 1 (2022) Vol 7, No 2 (2021) Vol 7, No 1 (2021) Vol 6, No 2 (2020) Vol 6, No 1 (2020) Vol 5, No 2 (2019) Vol 5, No 1 (2019) Vol 4, No 2 (2018) Vol 4, No 2 (2018) Vol 4, No 1 (2018) Vol 4, No 1 (2018) Vol 3, No 2 (2017) Vol 3, No 2 (2017) Vol 3, No 1 (2017) Vol 3, No 1 (2017) Vol 2, No 2 (2016) Vol 2, No 2 (2016) Vol 2, No 1 (2016) Vol 2, No 1 (2016) Vol 1, No 2 (2015) Vol 1, No 2 (2015) Vol 1, No 1 (2015) Vol 1, No 1 (2015) More Issue