cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta timur,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas
Published by Universitas Jayabaya
ISSN : 14118564     EISSN : 25025511     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas (JPHL) is published duo-annually in May and November, and aimed to provide research articles in order to have a significant implication to the world of law. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas (JPHL) provides cutting-edge and comprehensive analysis of gap between theory and practice as well as the significant implications of the legal world. The scope of this journal has become essential for criminal law, civil, constitutional and international law. The Journal is highly relevant to all professionals, directors, managers, entrepreneurs, professors, academic researchers and graduate students in the field of Law studies.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 14, No 1 (2020)" : 5 Documents clear
Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Sebagai Fungsi Pengawasan Lembaga Negara Kristiawanto Kristiawanto
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 14, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v14i2.142

Abstract

This study aims to examine that the fundamental problem is the use of the inquiry right of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia to the Corruption Eradication Commission. The research method used is the normative juridical legal research type, the researcher uses four approaches, namely the statute approach, the case approach, the conceptual approach and the comparative approach. The legal materials used in this study are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Procedures for collecting legal materials based on problem topics that have been formulated in the formulation of the problem and reviewed and analyzed. Whereas the processing and analysis of legal materials by describing and linking them in such a way that they are presented in systematized writing. The results found that the Authority through the functions are clearly given by the right of inquiry is the right of Parliament to conduct an investigation into the implementation of a law and/or policy of the Government with regard to the important things, strategically, and have broad impact on society, nation, and state allegedly contrary to statutory regulations. The mechanism for using the DPR’s inquiry rights against the KPK can be concluded that the KPK is the subject of the DPR’s inquiry right in its supervisory function.
Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Taufik Yanuar Chandra; Indik Rusmono
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 14, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v14i1.143

Abstract

This study aims to examine that the Corruption Eradication Act, there are difficulties or obstacles in knowing the amount of funds from the results of criminal acts of corruption. Therefore, the Supreme Court issued a guideline in the Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2014 concerning Criminal Additional Substitution in the Case of Corruption Crime. The provisions of the Supreme Court Regulation are intended to complement the weaknesses and shortcomings of the provisions of Article 18 of Law Number 31 of 1999 jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption. This study uses normative data with primary and secondary law data sources. Data collection techniques in this study are observation, documentation and literature study. The data collected is analyzed qualitatively. Found that the execution of substitute money based on a decision that has legal force remains contained in Article 9 of the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2014. The results of the auction of state booty, according to Article 9 of the Regulation of the Minister of Finance Number 03 / PMK.06 / 2011 governing the handling of state spoils, aregiven full power to the service office to deposit into the state treasury as Non-Tax State Revenue in the form of general acceptance of the Prosecutor’s Office within 3 (three) months and can be extended for a maximum of 1 (one) month
Cyberbullying dan Tantangan Hukum Citasari Jayaputri
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 14, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v14i1.202

Abstract

Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku cyberbullying hingga kini belum memiliki batas yang tegas, sebab tidak semua perilaku antisosial ini menjadi masalah hukum. Cyberbullying sebagai suatu perilaku antisosial, dapat ditinjau dari beberapa aspek seperti kriminologi, viktimologi, psikologi dan psikiatri. Dengan menggunakan teknologi secara kontinyu dapat mengindikasikan bahwa cyberbullying dapat menjadi masalah terus-menerus yang pada akhirnya dapat melampaui bentuk tradisional bullying. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis normatif. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan studi kepustakaan (library research). Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis kualitatif normatif dengan menggabungkan penalaran induksi dan deduksi. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa ada berbagai jenis cyberbullying yang meliputi flaming, pelecehan, peniruan identitas, penyebaran dan tipu daya, pengucilan dan pengucilan, fitnah, fitnah, cyberstalking. Pengalaman bullying tradisional dan cyberbullying dikaitkan dengan sejumlah hasil negatif bagi korban dan pelaku dalam hal kesehatan psikologis dan fisik, fungsi sosial, dan perilaku. Ketentuan Cyberbullying terdapat pada KUHP dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Fungsi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terkait Tanggungjawab Diskresi Kepolisian Zulkifli Zulkifli
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 14, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v14i1.223

Abstract

This study aims to see that police discretion has the potential to be abused, in justice, acts of corruption are things that cannot be hidden anymore. Pretrial as a means of control and supervision in its implementation has limitations. Based on the result, police discretion liability in the function of criminal law enforcement in Law on Police and Criminal Procedural Code was not governed expressly. Therefore, the concept of police discretion must obtain clearer, more measured, and objective interpretation and explanation so that the legitimization and operational are application and in line with the conception of legal state, law enforcement, and law liability. The absence of mechanism and examining and/or testing institution could not be maintained anymore, so had to be open to the obligation to account for it, either by pseudo-administrative trial, pure administrative trial, or both, with internal liability or external liability. Besides that, the aspect of legitimization and operational of police discretion was not applicable, limited by and in the sense within the scope of its legality principle and specification, and could not be used in the function of criminal law enforcement except police investigator discretion as a form of special discretion and constituted a specification of police discretion, realized in free discretion and bound discretion according to the Criminal Procedural Code.
Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Perlindungan Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Diah Sulastri Dewi
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 14, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v14i1.224

Abstract

The deradicalization program is a program mandated by Law Number 5 of 2018 which is carried out in coordination with government institutions or institutions with targets being carried out on suspects, defendants, convicts, prisoners, ex-terrorism convicts, and people or groups who have been exposed to radical terrorism. The normative legal research method in this research used a methodological approach that is applied, namely the legal approach, conceptual approach, historical approach, and philosophical approach. Based on the results of this research that the application of the concept of deradicalization to perpetrators of criminal acts of terrorism in Indonesia since the issuance of Presidential Decree number 46 of 2010 concerning the National Agency for Combating Criminal Acts of Terrorism has been running but in the implementation of the deradicalization program it has not touched the substance of the root of the problem, namely efforts to stem the rate of rad[1]icalism. Deradicalization model that prioritizes reintegration such as counter terrorism, preventing radicalism, understanding comparisons, avoiding hate provocations, hostility in the name of religion, preventing people from being indoctrinated, and community participation rejecting terrorism.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 19, No 1 (2025) Vol 18, No 2 (2024) Vol 18, No 1 (2024) Vol 17, No 2 (2023) Vol 17, No 1 (2023) Vol 16, No 1 (2022) Vol 14, No 2 (2020) Vol 15, No 2 (2021) Vol 15, No 1 (2021) Vol 14, No 1 (2020) Vol 13, No 1 (2019) Vol 11, No 1 (2017) Vol 10, No 2 (2016) Vol 10, No 1 (2016) Vol 9, No 2 (2015) Vol 9, No 1 (2015) More Issue