cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta timur,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas
Published by Universitas Jayabaya
ISSN : 14118564     EISSN : 25025511     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas (JPHL) is published duo-annually in May and November, and aimed to provide research articles in order to have a significant implication to the world of law. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas (JPHL) provides cutting-edge and comprehensive analysis of gap between theory and practice as well as the significant implications of the legal world. The scope of this journal has become essential for criminal law, civil, constitutional and international law. The Journal is highly relevant to all professionals, directors, managers, entrepreneurs, professors, academic researchers and graduate students in the field of Law studies.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 2 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 19, No 1 (2025)" : 2 Documents clear
Kedudukan Hukum Terhadap Pengguna Jasa Prostitusi Online Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Samsir, Samsir
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 19, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v19i1.278

Abstract

The use of social networks is not only a means of socializing and exchanging information but also an interactive medium, serving as a practical bridge for conducting business, providing services or social resources, and being utilized as a platform for engaging in illicit activities. Nowadays, social media has become a common and effective tool for achieving objectives in business affairs related to prostitution. This study employs the normative legal research method, which involves examining applicable laws and regulations or those implemented concerning a specific legal issue. In this context, the study analyzes the problem from the perspective of legal provisions on the criminal act of online prostitution. Based on various legal provisions in the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions, and Law No. 44 of 2008 on Pornography, the existing regulations have not been effective in prosecuting and combating the online prostitution business. These laws do not regulate the users of prostitution services, resulting in their exemption from legal prosecution under Indonesia’s Positive Law. Online prostitution refers to prostitution activities that use the internet as a medium for transactions. Under the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), only individuals who facilitate online prostitution, such as pimps or procurers, can be criminally prosecuted. Meanwhile, sex workers and their clients cannot be punished, as this offense is considered a victimless crime.
Implementasi Prinsip Business Judgment Rule Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Direksi BUMN Muhammad, Ogan
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 19, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v19i1.285

Abstract

This research examines the implementation of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) as a legal safeguard for directors of state-owned enterprises (BUMN) in Indonesia. Although normatively recognized under Article 97(5) of Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies and reinforced by Government Regulation No. 23 of 2022, its application remains hindered by legal dualism and judicial inconsistency. Through a normative juridical approach, the study finds that the broad interpretation of “state financial losses” under the Anti-Corruption Law obscures the distinction between business risks and unlawful acts. To ensure legal certainty and corporate accountability, the study recommends harmonizing corporate and public law, issuing judicial guidelines by the Supreme Court, and strengthening Good Corporate Governance (GCG) practices within state-owned enterprises

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 19, No 1 (2025) Vol 18, No 2 (2024) Vol 18, No 1 (2024) Vol 17, No 2 (2023) Vol 17, No 1 (2023) Vol 16, No 1 (2022) Vol 14, No 2 (2020) Vol 15, No 2 (2021) Vol 15, No 1 (2021) Vol 14, No 1 (2020) Vol 13, No 1 (2019) Vol 11, No 1 (2017) Vol 10, No 2 (2016) Vol 10, No 1 (2016) Vol 9, No 2 (2015) Vol 9, No 1 (2015) More Issue