cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
eko subaktiansyah
Contact Email
eko.subaktiansyah@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
support@inajog.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Majalah Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia)
Published by Perkumpulan Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia
ISSN : 23386401     EISSN : 23387335     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health
The Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is an official publication of the Indonesian Society of Obstetrics and Gynekology. INAJOG is published quarterly.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 14 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue " Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019" : 14 Documents clear
Sacrospinosus Fixation Efectivity in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Patient Andriansyah, Yulius; F, Amir; B, Firmansyah; Theodorus, Theodorus
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (63.601 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v7i1.837

Abstract

Abstract   Background : Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a condition in which interna genitalia protrude into vagina, or even out of vagina. This occur due to weaknesses of pelvic muscle, fascia and ligaments support. Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF) is an ideal vaginal procedure for POP repair with 90-95% success rate. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of SSF in patients with POP at dr. Mohammad Hoesin hospital (RSMH) Palembang Method: Randomized clinical trial (RCT) was performed at RSMH Palembang from January to September 2017. There were 30 samples of pelvic organ prolapse who met the inclusion criteria. Data frequency and distribution were described in table form and the effectiveness of SSF were analyzed by Wilcoxon / paired t-test while the effectiveness ratio was analyzed by Mann Whitney / independent t-test. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0. Result: There were no differences in patient characteristics (age, parity, body weight, height, and occupation) between the two treatment groups (p <0.05). There were differences of breech pain (proctalgia) before and after 1, 3, and 6 months post operation in SSF group (p <0.05), in which proctalgia was more exquisite after than before surgery. The results showed that SSF was effective in reducing urinary disorders, defecation disorders, vaginal prolapse, cystocele and rectocele, and effectively improving the quality of life of POP patient. In addition, there was a difference of proctalgia and vaginal prolapse 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery between two groups where the adverse outcome of the proctalgia was more significant in SSF group but the vaginal prolapse was more significant in the non-SSF group. There were no differences in bleeding complications (p = 1,000) and infection (p = 1,000) between the two groups. Conclusion: Sacrospinosus Fixation was effectively reduces the vaginal prolapse of pelvic organ prolapse patients. Keywords: Urinary, Defecation, Sacrospinosus Fixation, Quality of Life, Proclatgia, Rectocele, Cystocele. Abstrak   Latar Belakang:. Prolapsus organ panggul (POP) merupakan keadaan dimana suatu organ genitalia turun kedalam vagina, bahkan mungkin keluar liang vagina. Hal ini terjadi dikarenakan kelemahan otot, fasia dan ligamen penyokongnya. Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF) adalah prosedur vaginal yang ideal untuk perbaikan POP dengan tingkat keberhasilan 90-95%. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas SSF pada penderita prolaps organ panggul di rumah sakit dr. Mohammad Hoesin (RSMH) Palembang Metode: Uji klinis acak berpembanding (RCT) dilakukan di RSMH Palembang sejak bulan Januari sampai September 2017. Didapatkan sampel sebanyak 30 penderita prolaps organ panggul yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi. Frekuensi dan distribusi data dijelaskan dalam bentuk table dan efektivitas SSF dianalisis dengan uji Wilcoxon/paired t-test dan perbandingan efektivitas dianalisa dengan uji Mann Whitney/independent t-Test menggunakan SPSS versi 16.0. Hasil: Analisis statistik tidak terdapat perbedaan karakteristik pasien baik umur, paritas, berat badan, tinggi badan, dan pekerjaan antara kedua kelompok perlakuan (p< 0,05). Didapatkan bahwa SSF efektif mengurangi gangguan berkemih, gangguan defekasi, prolaps vagina, sistokel dan rektokel serta meningkatkan kualitas hidup pasien POP, namun terdapat perbedaan nyeri bokong (proktalgia) sebelum dan sesudah 1 bulan, 3 bulan dan 6 bulan operasi pada group SSF (p <0,05). dimana proktalgia lebih dirasakan setelah operasi dibandingkan sebelum operasi. Selain itu terdapat perbedaan proklatgia dan prolaps vagina 1,3 dan 6 bulan setelah operasi antar kedua group dimana proktalgia lebih dirasakan pada kelompok SSF namun prolaps vagina lebih banyak dialami oleh kelompok non SSF. Tidak terdapat perbedaan komplikasi perdarahan (p = 1,000) dan infeksi (p = 1,000) antara kedua kelompok. Simpulan: Fiksasi sakrospinosus efektif mengurangi prolaps vagina pasien prolaps organ panggul. Kata Kunci:. Berkemih, Defekasi, Fiksasi sacrospinosus, Kualitas Hidup, Nyeri Bokong, Rektokel, Sistoke  
The Proportion of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Stage IIA1 and IIA2 Cervical Cancer who were Treated for Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy andrijono, Andrijono; Ginealdy, Wahyu
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (59.963 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v7i1.872

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to determine a difference in prognosis of stage IIA1 cervical cancer compared to stage IIA2 based on the incidence of metastasis to pelvic lymph nodes by radical hysterectomy. Methods:A cross sectional study was conducted among 108 stage II cervical cancer patient post radical hysterectomy in obstetric gynecologic department of Dr. CiptoMangunkusumo hospital since 2006-2016. Results: From 108 patients with cervical cancer stage IIA, 80 (74%) patients are stage IIA1 and the remaining the remaining 28 (26%) patients are stage IIA2. The average age of patients at stage IIA2 (47.79 years) younger than IIA1 (55.85 years) and also patient at stage IIA1 having a higher parity number which is 4 compare to stage IIA2 with the number of parity 2. The Involvement of lymph node metastasis in patients with stage IIA1 and IIA2 cervical cancer were 51 (63.75%) and 16 (57.14%) respectively. Conclusion: Metastatic factor to lymphnode in both stage have the same result. There was no difference in the proportion of lymph node metastasis occurring in both stage IIA cervical cancer stage which was corrected with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with p = 0,535. Changing staging does not seem to improve the prognosis. Keywords: cervical cancer, stage IIA, lymphnode metastatic   Tujuan:Membuktikan adanya perbedaan prognosis kanker servik stadium IIa1 dibanding stadium IIa2 berdasarkan kejadian metastasis ke kelenjar getah bening pelvik yang dilakukan histerektomi radikal. Metode: Dengan menggunakan metode potong lintang dilakukan pengambilan data  108 sampel pasien kanker serviks stadium IIA yang dilakukanpembedahanhisterektomiradikal di Departemen OnkologiGinekologi RSUP. Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta sejak tahun 2006 hingga tahun 2016. Hasil: Pasien kanker serviks stadium IIA1 sebanyak 80 (74%) pasien dan stadium IIA2 sebanyak 28 (26 %) pasien. Pada stadium IIA2 (47.79 tahun) didapatkan rata ratausiapasienlebihmudadibandingkan IIA1 (55.85 tahun). Pada stadium IIA1 jugadidapatkanjumlahparitas yang lebihtinggiyaitu 4 sedangkanpada stadium IIA2 denganjumlahparitas 2. Keterlibatan metastasis kelenjar getah bening pada pasien kanker serviks stadium IIA1 dan IIA2 berjumlah 51 (63.75%) dan 16 (57.14%) secara berurutan. Tidak terdapat perbedaan proporsi kejadian metastasis kelenjar getah bening pada kedua kelompok stadium kanker serviks pada stadium IIA dengan nilai p = 0,535. Kesimpulan: Faktor metastasis kelenjar getah bening pada kedua stadium memiliki hasil yang serupa.Tidak terdapat perbedaan proporsi kejadian metastasis kelenjar getah bening pada kedua kelompok stadium kanker serviks stadium IIA1 dan IIA2 yang ditatalaksna dengan histerektomi radikal dan limfadenektomi pelvis. Perubahan penetapan stadium sepertinya tidak memperbaiki prognosis. Kata kunci : Kanker serviks, stage IIA, kelenjar getah bening, faktor prognostik
Preeclampsia after the Seven Quantum Leap Prediction Mose, Johanes C
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (39.819 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v7i1.986

Abstract

Comparison of Postpartum Urinary Retention Healing between Groups with Methods of Residual Urine Measurement Four Hours versus Six Hours Post-Delivery Moegni, Fernandi; Hani, Ummu
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (58.306 KB) | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v7i1.838

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To know the difference of recovery time and the urinary residual volume between group of patient with different time of  urinary residual collecting. Method: A randomized controlled trial was held at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo central general hospital and central Karawang hospital between March and Desember 2017. Postpartum women with urinary retention risks, willing to contribute to the trial, and diagnosed as post partum urinary retention were divided into 2 groups. Urinary residual volume was measured in 4th hour and 6th hour in each group. Patient then treated according to RSCM guideline, and the time of recovery was documented. Result: Both group have similar characteristic. The median length of recovery in the group which the urinary residual was measured in 4th hour was 30 hours, 21 hours shorter than 6th hour group, 51 hours (p< 0.001). The median of urinary residual volume of the 4th hour group was 600 ml, 400 ml lesser than the 6th hour group, 1000 ml (p< 0.001) Conclussion: time of recovery are shorter in the 4th  hour group and the urinary residual volume are less in the 4th hour group compared to the 6th hour group. Keywords: post partum urinary retention, urine residual, urinary residual collecting time   Abstrak Tujuan: untuk mengetahui lama pemulihan dan volume residu urin pada kelompok pasien dengan retensio urin pascapersalinan dengan beda waktu pengukuran, Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan desai uji klinis acak di RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo dan RSUD Karawang bulan Maret-Desember 2017. Perermpuan pascasalin dengan risiko retensio urin pasca persalinan, bersedia mengikuti penelitian, dan terdiagnosis retensio urin dibagi menjadi dua kelompok. Kelompok pertama diukur residu urinnya dalam 4 jam, kelompok kedua dalam 6 jam. Pasien lalu diberikan tatalaksana retensio urin sesuai protokol RSUPNCM dan dicatat waktu pulihnya. Hasil: Karakteristik pasien pada kedua kelompok dianggap setara. Median lama pemulihan pasien retensio urin yang diukur residu urin 4 jam adalah 30 jam, berbeda 21 jam dengan pasien yang diukur resiudnya 6 jam, yaitu 51 jam (p<0.001).  Median jumlah  residu urin pada kelompok pengukuran residu urin 4 jam adalah 600 ml, berbeda 400 ml dengan kelompok pengukuran 6 jam, yaitu 1.000 ml (p<0.001). Kesimpulan: Lama pemulihan lebih singkat pada kelompok pasien dengan waktu pengukuran residu urin 4 jam dibandingkan dengan 6 jam. Jumlah residu urin lebih sedikit pada pengukuran residu 4 jam dibanding 6 jam Kata kunci: retensio urin pasca persalinan, residu urin, waktu pengukuran residu urin

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 13. No. 3 July 2025 Volume 13. No. 2 April 2025 Volume 13. No. 1 January 2025 Volume 12 No. 4 October 2024 Volume 12 No. 3 Jully 2024 Volume 12 No. 2 April 2024 Volume 12 No. 1 January 2024 Volume 11 No. 4 October 2023 Volume 11 No. 3 July 2023 Volume 11 No. 2 April 2023 Volume 11 No. 1 January 2023 Volume 10 No. 4 Oktober 2022 Volume 10 No. 3 July 2022 Volume 10 No. 2 April 2022 Volume 10 No. 1 January 2022 Volume 9 No. 4 October 2021 Volume 9 No. 3 July 2021 Volume 9 No. 2 April 2021 Volume 9 No. 1 January 2021 Volume 8 No. 4 October 2020 Volume 8 No. 3 July 2020 Volume 8 No. 2 April 2020 Volume 8 No. 1 January 2020 Volume 7 No. 4 October 2019 Volume 7 No. 3 July 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume. 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 More Issue