cover
Contact Name
eko subaktiansyah
Contact Email
eko.subaktiansyah@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
support@inajog.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Majalah Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia)
ISSN : 23386401     EISSN : 23387335     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
The Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is an official publication of the Indonesian Society of Obstetrics and Gynekology. INAJOG is published quarterly.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 13 Documents
Search results for , issue "Volume 12 No. 4 October 2024" : 13 Documents clear
The value of intrapartum ultrasound in predicting mode of delivery: A prospective cohort study Omar, Gamal; Marwa F Sharaf; Mohammad A. Taymour
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 12 No. 4 October 2024
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v12i4.2526

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: Ultrasound contributes significantly to management of labor, delivery and prevention of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Among many suggested intra-partum ultrasound parameters, the use of transperineal ultrasound scan to assess the angle of progression (AoP) and levator hiatus anteroposterior diameter (APD) has been suggested to result in a more objective evaluation of labor progress. The aim of this study was to assess this claim. Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study involving primparous term singleton vertex presentation pregnant patients >18 years old admitted in the first stage of labor between January 2021 and May 2023. All patients provided an informed written consent. This investigation utilized both transabdominal and transperineal ultrasonography for comprehensive fetal and pelvic floor assessment. Transabdominal ultrasound evaluated standard parameters including fetal occiput position, biometry number, viability, presentation, and estimated fetal weight. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasonography, specifically performed during the first stage of labor, focused on the Levator Hiatus, measuring its anteroposterior diameter (APD) at rest and during Valsalva maneuver, as well as the angle of progression (AOP). Results: The study population comprised 609 participants with a mean age of 22.8 ± 4.3 years and a high prevalence of being overweight and obesity (38.8% and 57.8%, respectively). When comparing patients who had an intrapartum CS to those who had a normal vaginal delivery (NVD). However, on logistic regression, age, BMI, gestational age, posterior occiput presentation, head circumference (HC), AOP (V) and APD (V) as significant predictors for both ICS and 2nd stage CS (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that maternal age, BMI, gestational age, occiput posterior position, Angle of progression at Valsalva and levator hiatus anteroposterior diameter at Valsalva were independent significant predictors for Intrapartum cesarean section in primiparous women at term When the ratio between HC/APD at rest, BPD/APD at Valsalva and HC/APD at Valsalva is high, while the APD at Valsalva, AoP Valsalva values are low, cesarean section was more likely to be the mode of delivery. Keywords: Intrapartum ultrasound, angle of progression, anteroposterior diameter of levator hiatus, mode of delivery, intrapartum cesarean section.
Evaluation of Estradiol and Pro-Inflammatory Marker Level with VAS Score After Progestin Therapy in Endometriosis Patients Muthalib, Aidrus; Sumapraja, Kanadi; Harzif, Achmad Kemal; Maidarti, Mila
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 12 No. 4 October 2024
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v12i4.2531

Abstract

Objectives: To compare estradiol levels and proinflammatory biomarkers (IL-6, IL-1B, and COX-2) in endometriosis patients with pain and without pain after progestin therapy. Methods: This observational cross-sectional study involved 47 endometriosis patients undergoing three months of progestin therapy at RSUPN Cipto Mangunkusumo from March to June 2024. Serum levels of COX-2, IL-6, IL-1B, and estradiol will be measured using ELISA and Microplate Enzyme Immunoassay, with pain status assessed to determine associations between biomarkers and pain presence. Results: A significant difference in COX-2 levels between patients with pain and those without, with higher levels in the pain group [1.845 (1.24-10.26) vs 1.55 (0.32-3.07), p = 0.004]. A significant positive correlation was found between IL-1Beta and IL-6 (r = 0.471, p = 0.001). COX-2 levels also exhibited a weak but statistically significant positive correlation with VAS scores (r = 0.360, p = 0.013). Conclusion: There is a difference in inflammatory markers IL-6, IL-1 Beta and COX-2 in endometriosis patients with progestin therapy who experience pain and painlessness. Keywords: endometriosis, estradiol, proinflammation, progestin therapy.
Stem Cell Therapy in Urogynecology – Expanding Horizons in Regenerative Medicine santoso, Budi I
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 12 No. 4 October 2024
Publisher : Indonesian Socety of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32771/inajog.v12i4.2587

Abstract

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13


Filter by Year

2024 2024


Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 13. No. 3 July 2025 Volume 13. No. 2 April 2025 Volume 13. No. 1 January 2025 Volume 12 No. 4 October 2024 Volume 12 No. 3 Jully 2024 Volume 12 No. 2 April 2024 Volume 12 No. 1 January 2024 Volume 11 No. 4 October 2023 Volume 11 No. 3 July 2023 Volume 11 No. 2 April 2023 Volume 11 No. 1 January 2023 Volume 10 No. 4 Oktober 2022 Volume 10 No. 3 July 2022 Volume 10 No. 2 April 2022 Volume 10 No. 1 January 2022 Volume 9 No. 4 October 2021 Volume 9 No. 3 July 2021 Volume 9 No. 2 April 2021 Volume 9 No. 1 January 2021 Volume 8 No. 4 October 2020 Volume 8 No. 3 July 2020 Volume 8 No. 2 April 2020 Volume 8 No. 1 January 2020 Volume 7 No. 4 October 2019 Volume 7 No. 3 July 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7 No. 2 April 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 7, No. 1 January 2019 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 4 October 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6 No. 3 July 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 2 April 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume 6. No. 1. January 2018 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 4, October 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 3, July 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 2, April 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume. 5, No. 1, January 2017 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume 4, No. 4, October 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No.3, July 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 2, April 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 4, No. 1, January 2016 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 4, October 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, No. 3, July 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, no. 2, April 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 3, No. 1, January 2015 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 4, October 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 3, July 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 2, April 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 2, No. 1, January 2014 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume. 37, No. 2, April 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume. 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume 37, No. 1, January 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 4, October 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 1, No. 3, July 2013 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 4, October 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 3, July 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 2, April 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 36, No. 1, January 2012 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 4, October 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 3, July 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 2, April 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 35, No. 1, January 2011 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 4, October 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34, No. 3, July 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34. No. 2, April 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 34, No. 1, January 2010 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33. No. 4, October 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 3, July 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 2, April 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 33, No. 1, January 2009 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 4, October 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 3, July 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 2, April 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 32, No. 1, January 2008 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 4, October 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 3, July 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 2, April 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 31, No. 1, January 2007 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 4, October 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 3, July 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 2, April 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 Volume. 30, No. 1, January 2006 More Issue