cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika
Published by Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
ISSN : 20883021     EISSN : 25988077     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 16 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 5 No 2 (2015)" : 16 Documents clear
PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN AIR DAN RME PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA Sari, Ririn Arinta
Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol 5 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36456/buanamatematika.v5i2:.393

Abstract

In the 2013 curriculum requires students to actively observing, ask, reasoning, trying, exploring, and concluding the material provided by the teacher. Many models of learning that can be applied on the 2013 curriculum at the school to improve students’ achievement. In this study, researchers used two different models of learning can improve mathematics learning achievement, namely AIR learning model (Auditory Intellectually Repetition) and RME learning model (Realistic Mathematics Education).Formulation of the problem in this study is whether there are differences in mathematics learning results set of material relations between students taught using AIR learning model (Intellectual Auditory Repetition) and RME leaning model (Realistic Mathematics Education) in seventh grade at SMP Negeri 3 Waru?. While the purpose of this study was to determine whether there are differences in mathematics learning results set of material relations between students taught using AIR learning model (Intellectual Auditory Repetition) and RME learning model (Realistic Mathematics Education) in class VII SMP Negeri 3 Waru.This is an experimental research. In this study takes two classes as a sample. To determine the sample used sampling methods using purposive sampling. The data collection method used the test and documentation method. While the method of data analysis used statistical data analysis using t-test formula. Based on the results of the analysis of the data, obtained tobserve = 3.27 > ttable = 1.99773, so it can be concluded that there are differences in mathematics learning results set of relations material between students taught using AIR learning model (Auditory Intellectually Repetition) and RME learning model (Realistic Mathematic Education) at seventh grade SMP Negeri 3 Waru. Keywords: RME, AIR, The Result of Mathematic
PENGARUH PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA Akbar, Ali
Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol 5 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36456/buanamatematika.v5i2:.394

Abstract

Teacher must always has many creation for every lesson to make the different situation. Find the way how to rise the motivation of learning result is the main task which do for the purpose learning to be fun and satisfying of learning result. This is the role of teacher as a motivator, so the writer provides decriptive quantitative research with the title “The Influence Of Cooperative Learning Method Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) Type To The Result Of Mathematics Learning Student 2014/2015”. The problem of the research is what is the influence of cooperative learning method Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) type to the result of mathematics student of class VII SMPN 1 Wonoayu. “Therefore, the purpose of this research is to know whether or not the influence of learning method to the result of learning mathematics student of class VII SMPN 1 Wonoayu”.after the result of research has t observed > t table is 3,514 > 1,666witha significance level of0.001 (a = 0,05 ). The result of post test control class lesser 75,75 than experiment class 61,81, so that the conclusion is there are the influence of learing method to the result of learning mathematics student of class VII SMPN 1 Wonoayu 2014/2015 school year. Keywords: Two Stay Two Stray, the result of mathematics learning
EFEKTIVITAS PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA MATERI MATRIKS BERBASIS OUTDOOR LEARNINGPROCESS DAN OBSERVASI LANGSUNG Mardiyanto, Nanda Dwi
Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol 5 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36456/buanamatematika.v5i2:.395

Abstract

The researcher is motivated by the fact the main problem in mathematics learning in school today is the low absorption ability of students as evidenced by the average student learning outcomes that regard. The reason that learning methods shown by the teacher dominated more teachers, so students tend to be passive and not given access to evolve independently. This illustrates that the process of learning that takes place is not optimal.This study aims to determine the activities of students and teachers, completeness student learning outcomes, and student responses, the learning of mathematics-based matrix material outdoor learning process and direct observation at SMA Kartika Wijaya Surabaya.The method used is the study is a One-Shot Case Study. This research was conducted in class XI student Mia with a total of 35 students. From the research that has been conducted Based on the analysis of student activity data showed a total average score of 3.12 classified as active student, teacher activity obtained average score of "3.3 so it can be categorized very well. Student learning outcomes in classical declared complete. students who completed a total of 33 of the 35 students with a percentage of 91.5%. Response students classified as positive response because at 93.5%, which means ≥ 85%.So the researchers concluded that the study of mathematics-based matrix material outdoor learning process and effective direct observation done in high school Kartika Wijaya Surabaya. Keywords : Effectiveness , Outdoor Learning Process , Direct Observation
PEMBUKTIAN DUA PULUH LIMA DALIL PYTHAGORAS Sunaryo, Sunaryo; Sunardi, Hartanto
Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol 5 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36456/buanamatematika.v5i2:.396

Abstract

Mathematics is a discipline that can help Pythagoras solve some various problems (Government,Industry, science) Pythagoras is the first person who contributed the proof of this theorem, however, many people believe that there is a special connection between the sides of a ringt triangle just a long before Phytagoras found it. However Phytagoras gave very significant important role in various major related to mathematics. For example to form trigonometri and algebra, this theorem is a connection between Euclidean geometry among the three sides of the triangle which shaped from the length of the two sides will equalto square number which formed by the hypotenuse. In athematics, Phytagoras theorem is written using the general form , where a and b represent the length of two other condition of a right triagle and c has a length of the hypotenuse. This observation aim to describe there verification of twenty five arguments of Phytagoras appropriately and correctly. And by knowing the expected arguments of Phytagoras makes learning math is not just memorize a formula but to understand more deeply and can be implemented in their daily lives. This research method using the method of literature from the literature study theore hcal framework underlying stuctored problem soling method that includes the use of the arguments of Phytagras, Phytagoras formula, triple Phytagoras, comparison of the sides of aright triangle for special angels and lines o the trigle. Keywords : Phytagoras, hipotenusa.
PENERAPAN STRATEGI RECIPROCAL TEACHING MENGGUNAKAN MICROSOFT POWER POINT DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA S, Berlian Putri
Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol 5 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36456/buanamatematika.v5i2:.397

Abstract

One of the problems in the mathematical learning in junior high was the low ability students in solving math problems that are packed in the form of a question which more emphasis on understanding and mastery of a particular subject matter. Addressing such matters, the solution can be used i.e. through Reciprocal Teaching approach, in order to improve understanding about the concept of students Determines the slope of the equation of a straight line, engaging students actively in the learning, and encourages independent learning-centered students so teachers only as a facilitator.The methods used in this research is a method of tests given to students in order to know student complete learning. And given the now after learning method to determine the response of students to the learning of mathematics.From the results of research that has been carried out, the conclusion to be drawn that the student response after follow the Learning Strategy with application Reciprocal Teaching using Microsoft Power Point is positive. Student learning outcomes in classical had reached complete by the percentage of 88%. It can be seen from the number of students who completed 22 of 25 students. Keywords: Strategies For Reciprocal Teaching, Microsoft Power Point, Student Response, Test Results Of The Study.
PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN QTL DAN RME DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA Sari, Ira Mirantika
Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vol 5 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36456/buanamatematika.v5i2:.398

Abstract

This research is conducted by the fact that occurs until now , the results of learning about mathematics students still have low level, both on the level of education primary and the level of middle class .Considering the importance of mathematics in learning, there are kinds of classroom that are pleasing and mathematical connects with daily life can be used in learning math the way kind of classroom QTL and RME. The problem of the formulation of this research is no difference whether the results of learning mathematics material system of equations and inequality between students that were taught with a model of learning QTL and the model of learning RME in a class XSMKKartika 1 Surabaya ?.The purpose of this research is to know about differences between the results of learning mathematics material system of equations and inequality so students that were taught with a model of learning qtl and the model of learning rme in a class XSMKKartika 1 Surabaya . Including research experiment this kind of research.The population in this research is vocational school students SMK Kartika 1 Surabaya with the sample class X AK 1 is the class got learning RME and a class X AK 2 is a class of learning QTL received .The sample collection technique uses purposive sampling techniques.Data collection method uses the test and documentation .While a method of statistical data analysis using data analysis using t-test . Based on analisis from the results of data, obtained thitung = -2,098 and ttabel = 1,995.So we can conclude that that there is difference of the results between learning about mathematics matter system of equations and inequality, is students who are taught with a model of learning QTL and kind of classroom RME in class XSMKKartika 1 Surabaya . Keywords: QTL, RME, test student learning outcomes

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 16

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13 No 1 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2022) Vol 12 No 1 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2021) Vol 11 No 1 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2020) Vol 10 No 1 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2019) Vol 9 No 1 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2018) Vol 8 No 1 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2017) Vol 7 No 1 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2016) Vol 6 No 1 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2015) Vol 5 No 1 (2015) More Issue