cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dyah Anantalia Widyastari, BSPH., MPH., Ph.D (Cand.)
Contact Email
info@inschool.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
GHMJ@inschool.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Global Health Management Journal
Published by Yayasan Aliansi Cendekiawan Indonesia Thailand (Indonesian Scholars' Alliance)
ISSN : -     EISSN : 25809296     DOI : 10.35898/ghmj
Core Subject : Health, Education,
Education Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health
GLOBAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT JOURNAL (GHMJ) focuses on health field with strong preference (but not limited) on public health in general, maternal and child health, nursing, midwifery, sexual and reproductive health, public health nutrition, environmental health, occupational health and safety, health promotion, health economics in South East Asia and other regions. Applied science in health also becomes one of our priority, especially in the field of health information and technology, innovation in health, and development of devices, medicines, vaccines, procedures and systems developed to solve a health problem and improve quality of lives.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 11 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025)" : 11 Documents clear
Beyond Tradition: Time to Reform Peer Review Mosa, Ahmed A; Haji, Jodi Ramadan; Mohammad, Ameen Mosa
GHMJ (Global Health Management Journal) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Aliansi Cendekiawan Indonesia Thailand (Indonesian Scholars' Alliance)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35898/ghmj-831264

Abstract

Peer review is a cornerstone of research practice and scientific publishing, serving as a bridge between new proven science and presumably false scientific findings. However, the process often experiences delays, inconsistencies, bias, and deficiencies in the availability of qualified reviewers, so consequently fails to meet the needs of both the authors and the journals. This perspective outlines core challenges associated with peer review and proposes recommendations to enhance the efficacy of the process and improve the overall quality of reviews. Recommendations include providing different types of incentives to reviewers, developing a structured and guidelines-based reviewing system, and greater rigor over reviewer selection. Additionally, the incorporation of artificial intelligence now needs to be considered.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 11

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 2s (2025): Special Issues Vol. 8 No. 1s (2025): Special Issues Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3s (2024) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020) Vol 4, No 1 (2020): Online First Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): Online First Vol 3, No 3 (2019) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019) Vol 3, No 2 (2019) Vol 3, No 1 (2019) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2018) Vol 2, No 3 (2018) Vol 2, No 2 (2018) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018) Vol 2, No 1 (2018) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017) Vol 1, No 2 (2017) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017) Vol 1, No 1 (2017) More Issue