cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rahmat Aziz
Contact Email
azira@uin-malang.ac.id
Phone
+6281805343572
Journal Mail Official
journaljere@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jl. Udayana Kampus Tengah Singaraja, Bali, Indonesia 81116 Telp. +62362-22928
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation
Published by Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
ISSN : 2597422X     EISSN : 25492675     DOI : https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i4.36911
Core Subject : Humanities, Health, Education, Social,
Humanities Education Public Health Social Sciences Other
Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation (JERE) is an interdisciplinary publication of original research and writing on education which publishes papers to international audiences of educational researchers. The JERE aims to provide a forum for scholarly understanding of the field of education and plays an important role in promoting the process that accumulated knowledge, values, and skills are transmitted from one generation to another; and to make methods and contents of evaluation and research in education available to teachers, administrators and research workers. The journal encompasses a variety of topics, including child development, curriculum, reading comprehension, philosophies of education and educational approaches, etc.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 15 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 4 No 3 (2020): August" : 15 Documents clear
Students’ Reading Competency on High Order Thinking Items in The Junior High Schools Riadi, I. K. Sutra; Tantra, D. K.
Journal of Education Reseach and Evaluation Vol 4 No 3 (2020): August
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (319.765 KB) | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v4i3.27621

Abstract

The aimed of this study was to describe and compare the students’ reading competency in answering high order thinking items across classes, text genres, and reading indicators. In the present study, critical reading is defined as reading for comprehension of high-order-thinking items which are focused on the four indicators of reading competency, namely: main idea, specific ideas, textual references, and word meanings. This research was conducted quantitatively and focus on year seven students. To reach such purpose, a purposive sampling technique was used to choose the sample. The subjects of this study were 238 students. The instruments used to collect the data was a Reading Competency Test. The collected data were analysed quantitatively and interpreted descriptively. The first finding of this research shows that the level of the students’ reading competency in answering high order thinking items are categorized weak or low level on both the descriptive texts and recount texts which is the descriptive text and finding main idea are the highest mean score. The second finding shows that there is no significant difference of students’ reading competency in answering high order thinking items across classes, text genres, and reading indicators which is analysed by using One Way ANOVA with significant score is 0.054. > 0.05, thus Ho is accepted and H1 is rejected. The result of the study is an important information about the students’ reading competency in answering HOTS items. it is necessary to do next research in order to design future effective educational strategy or educational policy in learning.
Students' and Teachers' Perception on Reward in Online English Teaching Context Saraswati, N.M.S.D.; Ratminingsih, N.M.; Utami, IG.A.L.P.
Journal of Education Reseach and Evaluation Vol 4 No 3 (2020): August
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (259.091 KB) | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v4i3.27923

Abstract

Rewarding is one of the factors that influence student learning outcomes so it is important to describe the reward given by the teacher, the teacher's perception of the reward and the student's perception of the reward given by the teacher. This qualitative study aimed to investigate the types of rewards used in teaching English online; frequency of rewarding by teachers in online learning; in what context the reward is given and for what purpose; how teachers perceive rewards in online learning; and how students perceive rewards in online classrooms. The subjects of this study were 116 people consisting of 112 first grade students and 4 first grade teachers. To collect data, there were 3 methods used, namely: observation, recording and taking note. Meanwhile, the main instrument was the researcher himself who was assisted by additional instruments, questionnaires and observation sheets. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively with the Miles and Hubberman model. The results of this study are 1) the teacher gives verbal and object rewards, 2) verbal rewards are more often given, 3) there are three contexts of giving rewards, namely: perfect, almost perfect and needs improvement with different goals, 4) teacher perceptions show giving rewards have a positive influence in academic and non-academic students and 5) students' perceptions of rewards are that they are very happy and motivated after receiving a reward. These results have implications for designing rewards to be diverse and creative to motivate students.
Meta-Analysis of Teams Games Tournament Learning Model with Spinning Wheel Media-Based on Local Wisdom Toward Students’ Learning Outcomes Kurniawati, Devita; Taufiq, Mohammad; Kasiyun, Suharmono; Naufi'ah, Naufi'ah
Journal of Education Reseach and Evaluation Vol 4 No 3 (2020): August
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (333.775 KB) | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v4i3.28183

Abstract

Research that examines the effect of cooperative learning teams games tournament types on student learning outcomes has been done a lot, but the results of these studies have not received further study to be summarized and tested again the effectiveness of the effect of the learning model used. This study aims to analyze the effect of the use of a team games tournament type cooperative learning model with spinning wheel media-based local wisdom on the learning outcomes of elementary school students. The method used in this research is meta-analysis. The collection of data through online searches using the Google Scholar platform as many as 15 articles were collected with the details of 10 articles representing the learning models of team’s games tournaments and spinning wheel media while the remaining 5 articles are educational articles based on local wisdom. All articles are then analyzed with differences and similarities in data and then reprocessed using SPSS Version 25 using paired sample t-test and showing the Sig. (2-tailed), i.e. (0, 019) <α (0.05). So, H0 is rejected and it can be concluded that there is a significant difference from before and after the use of the learning model that assisted team’s tournament games wheel media in science subjects.
The Effect of Teacher Teaching Skills and Student Interest on History Learning Outcomes Sumyadi, Yadi; Umasih, Umasih; Syukur, Abdul
Journal of Education Reseach and Evaluation Vol 4 No 3 (2020): August
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (204.295 KB) | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v4i3.28349

Abstract

Learning outcomes have an important role in the learning process. This is because learning outcomes can be used as a benchmark to determine the extent to which students experience changes after receiving their learning experiences, are observed and measured in the form of knowledge, attitudes and skills. This study aims to analyze teaching skills and teacher learning interest towards historical learning outcomes. The research method used in this research is ex post fact, which means after the fact, by taking survey data. The population and sample in this study were high school students. In the data description analysis stage, the writer describes the problems related to student learning outcomes and the observation data of teacher teaching skills in the learning process. The correlation stage consists of the following steps: analysis prerequisite test and hypothesis testing. Based on the data analysis, the regression equation Y = 44.533 + 0.506 x was obtained, meaning that each addition of the teacher's teaching skills variable by one unit, the student learning outcomes variable increased by 0.506 units. So, it can be concluded that there is a relationship between teacher teaching skills and student learning outcomes.
The Effectiveness of the Logic Evaluation Model in K-13 Curriculum Analysis Mexdadoris, Mexdadoris; Jama, Jalius
Journal of Education Reseach and Evaluation Vol 4 No 3 (2020): August
Publisher : LPPM Undiksha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (223.309 KB) | DOI: 10.23887/jere.v4i3.29004

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the curriculum using the Logic Evaluation Model which includes 4 aspects; input evaluation, activity evaluation, output evaluation and outcome evaluation. The study approach used was mixed approach with a sequential explanatory method (sequence of evidence). This study was conducted by doing quantitative research first, then continue the research with qualitative methods to find conclusions. The sampling technique used Henry King's Nomogram Table, so that the number of teachers involved in this study was 78. In this study, researchers found that the implementation of Kurikulum 2013 was still quite sufficient with an average score was 3.84 and the TCR was 75.52%. The results of the evaluation of Kurikulum 2013 implementation on the input aspect was good with an average score was 3.96 and the TCR was 80.28%, in activity aspect it is sufficient with 3.70 average score and the TCR was 74.06%, The output aspect of Kurikulum 2013 implementation is sufficient with the average TCR was 3.96 and the average indicator was 73.62%, then the outcomes aspect is sufficient with the average score was 3.73 and the TCR was 74.13%. This research implies that there is a need for improvement in activities, inputs, and outcomes aspect, even though the activity evaluation component showed good Kurikulum 2013 implementation.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 15

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 9 No 3 (2025): August Vol 9 No 2 (2025): May Vol 9 No 1 (2025): February Vol 8 No 4 (2024): November Vol 8 No 3 (2024): August Vol 8 No 2 (2024): May Vol 8 No 1 (2024): February Vol 7 No 4 (2023): November Vol 7 No 3 (2023): August Vol 7 No 2 (2023): May Vol 7 No 1 (2023): February Vol 6 No 4 (2022): November Vol 6 No 3 (2022): August Vol 6 No 2 (2022): May Vol 6, No 1 (2022): February Vol 6 No 1 (2022): February Vol 5, No 4 (2021): November Vol 5 No 4 (2021): November Vol 5 No 3 (2021): August Vol 5, No 3 (2021) Vol 5, No 3 (2021): August Vol 5, No 2 (2021) Vol 5 No 2 (2021): May Vol 5, No 2 (2021): May Vol 5, No 1 (2021): February Vol 5 No 1 (2021): February Vol 4, No 4 (2020) Vol 4 No 4 (2020): November Vol 4, No 3 (2020) Vol 4 No 3 (2020): August Vol 4 No 2 (2020): May Vol 4, No 2 (2020) Vol 4 No 1 (2020): February Vol 4, No 1 (2020) Vol 3, No 4 (2019) Vol 3 No 4 (2019): November Vol 3, No 3 (2019) Vol 3 No 3 (2019): August Vol 3, No 2 (2019) Vol 3 No 2 (2019): May Vol 3 No 1 (2019): February Vol 3, No 1 (2019) Vol 2 No 4 (2018): November Vol 2, No 4 (2018) Vol 2, No 3 (2018) Vol 2 No 3 (2018): August Vol 2, No 2 (2018) Vol 2 No 2 (2018): May Vol 2, No 2 (2018) Vol 2, No 1 (2018) Vol 2 No 1 (2018): February Vol 1, No 4 (2017) Vol 1, No 4 (2017) Vol 1 No 4 (2017): November Vol 1, No 3 (2017) Vol 1 No 3 (2017): August Vol 1 No 2 (2017): May Vol 1, No 2 (2017) Vol 1, No 1 (2017) Vol 1 No 1 (2017): February More Issue