cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Aji Payuse
Contact Email
ajipayuse@warmadewa.ac.id
Phone
085338083663
Journal Mail Official
info.sosiologicaljurisprudence@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Terompong 24 Tanjung Bungkak Denpasar Bali, Indonesia
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal
Published by Universitas Warmadewa
ISSN : 26158809     EISSN : 26158795     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22225/scj
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal is a peer-reviewed law International journal which published research articles and theoretical articles in law science. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. It aims is to provide a place for academics and practitioners to publish original research articles, review articles, and book reviews. The scope of this journal area any topics concerning Legal Studies and Human Rights in all aspects. Scientific articles dealing with Civil Law, Indonesian Law, Business Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Administrative Law, International Law, Philosophy of Law, and Human Rights are particularly welcome. This journal published by Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa, two times a year in February and August. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal is available in print and online versions. ISSN printed version is 2615-8809 and ISSN electronic is 2615-8795. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal is Available online at https://www.ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/sjj/index since Volume 1 No 1 February 2018. The language used in this journal is English.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)" : 13 Documents clear
Imposition of Double Charges on Hydroelectric Power Plants Titah Shanty Saraswati; R. Ismala Dewi
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/scj.8.1.2025.73-81

Abstract

In meeting electricity needs, there is currently a shift in the use of fossil energy to water energy because fossil energy is no longer available. The use of water as a new renewable energy, as stated in the Electricity Supply Business Plan (RUPTL), which prioritizes Hydroelectric Power Plants (PLTA), is considered to require lower investment and stable electricity production compared to Solar Power Plants (PLTS) or Wind Power Plants (PLTB). Providing this water requires conservation costs and other water management costs. So the main topic studied in this research is the problems and impacts of the imposition of water fees including Natural Resource Management Services Fees (BJPSDA) and Surface Water Tax (PAP) on water resource conservation. The research used is explanatory doctrinal research using document studies. The results of the research are that apart from the BJPSDA, there is a PAP which has not been subject to earmarking. Both are regulated in different regulations but are imposed on the same object, namely water. Based on the analysis, it is necessary to evaluate how the implementation of the fee has been able to fulfill the community's rights to water and can maintain the sustainability of water availability through water resource conservation. Therefore, it is necessary to reconsider the imposition of double levies on surface water beneficiaries by changing the BJPSDA manager to a party who has a greater interest in water conservation results and applying the PAP earmarking concept.
Implementation of Public Policy on Health Services Based on Law Number 23 of 2014 on Regional Government Ni Putu Sawitri Nandari; Bagus Gede Ari Rama; Dewa Krisna Prasada; Putu Suparna
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/scj.8.1.2025.82-89

Abstract

Regional autonomy is the right, authority, and obligation of autonomous regions to regulate and manage their own Government Affairs and the interests of the local community in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI) system. The type of research used is normative or doctrinal law, through qualitative descriptive legal analysis. Results and discussion of the implementation of public policy on health services based on Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, namely health services are part of concurrent government affairs because health services are the authority of the Regional Government based on the principle of decentralization, so the regional government has the right to manage all forms of health service provisions, as regulated in Article 12 paragraph (1) which states that government affairs must provide basic services, one of which is in terms of health. The Bali Provincial Government is developing services in terms of traditional health by issuing Governor Regulation No. 55 of 2019 concerning Traditional Balinese Health Services. The Central Government and Regional Government are required to coordinate, especially in making regulations so that they have a socially just impact on all Indonesian people, especially in the field of health services that must reach remote villages. Health service efforts are carried out in a promotive, preventive, curative and rehabilitative manner carried out by the government.
Comparative Evaluation of Regulation and Law Enforcement of Corruption Crimes in Indonesia and Malaysia Ridwan Anthony Taufan; Erry Ariany; Ade Saptomo
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/scj.8.1.2025.90-97

Abstract

The research compares the legal system of corruption between Indonesia and Malaysia, focused on legislation, law enforcement agencies, evidentiary mechanisms, and the application of sanctions against perpetrators of corruption. Although both countries have similarities in classifying corruption as a serious criminal offense, the application of different legal systems, namely civil law in Indonesia and common law in Malaysia, has a significant impact on the effectiveness of law enforcement. Indonesia has more regulations addressing corruption offenses, in addition to law enforcement bodies like the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), which possesses wider authorities. In contrast, Malaysia depends on the Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM), which has restricted powers in prosecution. These differences are reflected in the sanction application, the reverse proof system, and the judicial mechanisms used in each country. This research is expected to provide insight into the effect of legal system differences on corruption eradication in the two countries.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue