cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Otto Fajarianto
Contact Email
ofajarianto@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
kadarudin.fnu@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Ade Irma Suryani No. 16 Kota Samarinda 75117
Location
Kota samarinda,
Kalimantan timur
INDONESIA
Awang Long Law Review
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Samarinda
ISSN : 26557355     EISSN : 26545462     DOI : https://doi.org/10.56301/awl
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Awang Long Law Review known as the ALLRev launched on November 1, 2018 and inaugurated formally by Chairman of the Awang Long School of Law. Besides "The Juris" Journal of Legal Sciences, Awang Long Law Review (ALLRev) is the official journal of the Awang Long School of Law published biannually (May and November) in electronic and printed versions. An electronic version of this issue is available at our website. The aims of this journal are to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of International Law, Economic Law, Criminal Law, Civil Law, Constitutional Law, Islamic Law, Administrative Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 653 Documents
 62   63   64   65   66 
Victimological Perspectives on Cybercrime Illegal Content Offenders: A Juridical Analysis of Cases in the Samarinda District Court Sunariyo Sunariyo; Imelda Hasibuan; Bayu Prasetyo
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v9i1.2450

Abstract

Sentencing disparity in Indonesia presents not merely a technical This study aims to analyze the application of a victimological perspective toward perpetrators of cyber illegal content offenses within the jurisdiction of the Samarinda District Court, particularly in situations where the perpetrators may simultaneously occupy the position of situational victims, structural victims, or individuals exploited within the cybercrime ecosystem. This research also seeks to identify the factors that lead perpetrators to become involved in the dissemination or production of illegal content, to assess the forms of legal protection that should be provided to marginalized parties involved in cybercrime, and to analyze the pattern of judicial considerations in adjudicating cyber illegal content cases from a victim protection perspective. The research method employed is normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, particularly through the analysis of decisions issued by the Samarinda District Court related to illegal content offenses. The findings indicate that perpetrators of cyber illegal content do not always act with full awareness or malicious intent; rather, their involvement is often influenced by digital pressure, online manipulation, or limited technological literacy. Therefore, the victimological perspective is essential in order to ensure that law enforcement is not solely oriented toward punishment but also considers the vulnerability of offenders and promotes a more humane and justice-oriented legal approach, objective of paper, followed by a statement regarding the methodology and a brief summary of results.
FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG INTERNAL INSPECTORATES OMBUDSMAN AND ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN ADDRESSING ABUSE OF AUTHORITY IN INDONESIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT Musafir
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v9i1.2452

Abstract

The handling of abuse of authority in Indonesian local government involves three mechanisms with distinct legal functions: internal government supervision conducted by the regional Inspectorate as part of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus, maladministration oversight conducted by the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia, and judicial assessment conducted by the State Administrative Court. The legal problem lies not in the number of institutions but in the absence of a sufficiently defined procedural interface between their findings, remedies, and jurisdictional boundaries. This article examines the legal position of each mechanism and develops a bounded model for connecting them without treating the court as an administrative coordination partner. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The analysis shows that internal audit findings, Ombudsman examinations, and judicial decisions cannot be arranged as a mandatory linear sequence. Article 20 of the Government Administration Law requires accurate classification of internal supervisory findings, while Article 21 and Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2015 establish a separate judicial route whose use depends on standing, a qualifying internal supervisory result, and procedural timing. Constitutional Court Decision Number 66/PUU-XXIV/2026 further requires administrative accountability to be addressed before criminal liability and clarifies the allocation of state financial loss. The article proposes differentiated interfaces: conditional administrative referral between the Inspectorate and Ombudsman, lawful transfer of relevant information, an evidentiary rather than coordinative relationship with the Administrative Court, and traceable follow-up within each institution
A JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FORGERY OF A CHILD'S CIVIL REGISTRATION DOCUMENT AND THE OMISSION OF ITS STATUS Moh Faiz Al Amin; Briliyan Ernawati; Daud Rismana
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v9i1.2484

Abstract

The forgery of civil registration documents in the practice of child trafficking disguised as illegal adoption is a legal issue that concerns the authenticity of the document and impacts the protection of a child’s identity and rights. This study aims to conduct a legal analysis of the forgery of the KIA booklet and birth certificates in Case No. 23/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Wat at the Wates District Court, as well as to analyze criminal liability for the acts of forgery that not included in the indictment or the judgment. This study utilizes a normative legal research method using both a statutory approach and a case-based approach. Legal materials were analyzed using a descriptive-analytical method by examining relevant laws and regulations, court decisions, legal doctrine, and legal literature. The results indicate that the acts of creating and using a fake KIA booklet and birth certificate that do not correspond to the actual facts can legally be categorized as the criminal offense of document forgery under Article 263 of the old Criminal Code. Alternatively, Article 391 of the National Criminal Code may apply if the acts occurred after the National Criminal Code came into effect. Meanwhile, the application of Article 93 of the Population Administration Law cannot be deemed fully satisfied because the Facts established at trial did not show the use of forged documents submitted to the related agencies for the purpose of population registration reports. The forgery served a functional role as a means to conceal the child’s identity and origins for child trafficking purposes. However, since the criminal offense of document forgery was not included in the indictment, the judge could not impose a sentence for that act, and the judgment only addressed the criminal offenses charged by the public prosecutor.

Page 66 of 66 | Total Record : 653

 62   63   64   65   66 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 4 (2026): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Awang Long Law Review Vol 5 No 2 (2023): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Awang Long Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): Awang Long Law Review Vol 1 No 1 (2018): Awang Long Law Review More Issue