TSAQAFAH
TSAQAFAH (pISSN: 1411-0334 | eISSN: 2460-0008) is journal of Islamic civilization published by University of Darussalam Gontor. It is semiannual journal published in May and November for the developing the scientific ethos. Editors accept scientific articles and result of research in accordance with its nature as a journal of Islamic Civilization, such as: Islamic Philosophy, Islam and Contemporary Issues, Religious Studies, Islamic Science, Islamic Economics, Islamic education, Qur’anic Studies, Islamic Law, and Islamic Ethics
Articles
10 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): Islamic Theology"
:
10 Documents
clear
EFEKTIVITAS TERAPI RATIONAL EMOTIVE BEHAVIOUR (REB) BERBASIS SUFISTIK TERHADAP PERILAKU PROKSTASINASI AKADEMIK MAHASISWA IAIN TULUNGAGUNG
Arman Marwing;
Germino Wahyu Broto
TSAQAFAH Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): Islamic Theology
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.3997
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dampak terapi REBT berbasis Sufistik dalam menurunkan tingkat prokrastinasi akademik pada mahasiswa di IAIN Tulungagung. Subjek penelitian adalah 36 Mahasiswa dari seluruh fakultas di IAIN Tulungagung. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif eksperimen dengan rancangan eksperimen one group pretest-posttest.design. Metode pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan skala prokrastinasi akademik yang dikembangkan oleh Mccloskey, untuk mengukur perubahan yang terjadi setelah pemberian tritmen. Hasil uji independent sample T- Test untuk N Gain score didapatkan nilai sig (2-Tailed) sebesar 0, 000 dimana lebih kecil dari nilaik kritik 0, 05 (sig. < 0, 05) . Dengan demikian dapat dinyatakan bahwa terapi Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy berbasis sufistik efektif dalam menurunkan tingkat prokrastinasi mahasiswa IAIN Tulungagung
الثوابت والمتغيرات في العقيدة عند صلاح الصاوي
Muhammad Abdul Malik Al-Furqon;
Muhammad Khalid Muslih;
Za’iem Hisbulloh;
M Shohibul Mujtaba
TSAQAFAH Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): Islamic Theology
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.4736
واجبت عقيدة المسلمين تحديات، منها خارجية ومنها داخلية. أما الخارجية فهي سيطرة الغرب على أفكار بعض المسلمين حتى أصبحوا متمسكين بصحة تعددية الأديان. وأما الداخلية فهي افتراق الأمة بسبب انتشار مذهب مفرّط في التضليل والتبديع بل التكفير فيما بين المسلمين. ومن ثم، قدم الباحث بحثه -مع القصور- في قضية الثوابت والمتغيرات في العقيدة مخرجا منصفا من تلك التحديات بإذن الله تعالى. وفي مجال الدراسة الاعتقادية، قد لا نجد بحثا علميا أو كتابا خاصا جمع فيه هذه القضية على سبيل التركيز، بل كم من كاتب بنظريته السيئة يعتمد في بحثه على مذهب النسبية وتعددية الاديان، فمنه لا يجد القارئ تخلصا موفَّقا على منهج أهل السنة والجماعة، بل وجد نفسه في حيرة بعيدة عن حق الإسلام. ولذلك، -مستعينا بالله- قدم الباحث هنا، عن حقيقة مفهوم الثوابت والمتغيرات وضوابطه وتطبيقه في المسائل العقدية. وفي هذه الدراسة، أشار الباحث إلى مؤلفات صلاح الصاوي، إذ هو أحد العلماء والناشطين في الدعوة الإسلامية العالمية، والذي قد رتب المسائل العقدية إلى الأحكام الثابتة والمتعيرة. وهدف الباحث بهذا الموضوع الكشف عن مفهوم الثوابت والمتغيرات عند صلاح الصاوي، وضوابطه، وتطبيقه في مسألة العقيدة، ألا وهي قضية الولاء والبراء. وللوصول على نتيجة وافية، استخدم الباحث المنهج الوصفي التحليلي، وذلك بوصف وتحليل أرآء صلاح الصاوي عن مفهوم الثوابت والمتغيرات في العقيدة التي وجد في مؤلفاته. هذا البحث من جملة الدراسة الكلامية، لأن المسائل التي قدمها الباحث خاصة في مجال المسائل الاعتقادية. ومن النتائج التي حصل عليها الباحث هي: 1) أن الثوابت في العقيدة عند صلاح الصاوي ينقسم إلى قسمين، هما: الثوابت المطلقة و الثوابت النسبية. القسم الأول هي النصوص القطعية الثبوت والدلالة ومواضع الإجماع الصريح التي لا تحل المنازعة فيها. وأما الثاني فهي بعض الإختيارات العلمية الراجحة التي ينبغي أن تتفق عليها الحراكات الإسلامية كافة. 2) وأن المتغيرات في العقيدة عند صلاح الصاوي فهي كل الظنيات وموارد الاجتهاد التي لا يضيق فيها على المخالف. 3) اتفق أهل العلم أن الولاء والبراء من شرط الإيمان، فمن يميل نفسه إلى الكفار، أي رضا على دينهم، فهو كافر بالاتفاق. وإن كان ميله لرحم أو حاجة إلى المادية، فقد يقع فيه الخلاف بين العلماء، منهم من يكفره، ومنهم من يرمي بالقاسق دون الكفر.الكلمات الرئيسية: الثوابت والمتغيرات، العقيدة، صلاح الصاوي
Epistemologi dan Teologi dalam Pemikiran al-Ghazali tentang Ilmu Kasyf
Syamsuddin Arif;
Kholili Hasib;
Zainal Abidin;
Neneng Uswatun Khasanah
TSAQAFAH Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): Islamic Theology
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.4765
Epistemologi dalam tradisi tasawuf memiliki karakter yang intuitif, metafisik dan illuminatif. Salah satu bentuk epistemologi tasawuf imam al-Ghazali adalah kasyf. Pengetahuan kasyf merupakan pengetahuan tertinggi dalam pandangan imam al-Ghazali. Pengetahuan kasyf merupakan bentuk pengintuisian yang melibatkan jiwa, hati dan akal. Menurut imam al-Ghazali, pengintuisian melalui jalan kasyf merupakan limpahan dari Allah swt. Tetapi, seseorang yang mengalami pengintuisian ini apabila jiwa dan hatinya bersih. Selain itu akal yang mengalami pengintuisian ini adalah bukan akal diskursif dalam pengertian biasa. Tetapi bagi imam al-Ghazali ada bagian akal yang dalam disebut intellektus. Jiwa yang mengalami kasyf ia mendapatkan pengalaman spiritual hingga kondisi jiwanya itu berada pada posisi tinggi. Pengetahuan yang dimiliki dan masuk ke dalam jiwa menjadi pengetahuan yang tinggi pula. Melihat realitas dunia tidak seperti pandangan mata orang awam dalam kesadaran biasa. Sehingga pemahaman tauhidnya juga berbeda dengan pemahaman tauhid orang biasa. Seorang yang mendapatkan limpahan kasyf ini disebut muqarrabun. Melihat alam tidak seperti orang biasa melihat alam. Ia mendapatkan penemuan-penemuan pada tiga aspek. Penemuan hal (perasaan), penemuan kognitif (ilmu) dan penemuan tertinggi yaitu penemuan berupa pengintuisian terhadap kewujudan. Pada penemuan kognitif ini kasyf dapat difungsikan sebuah sebuah metode pengetahuan. Ia melalui beberapa fase. Fase pertama melibatkan ilmu rasional-empirik, kemudian dilanjutkan dengan proses intuitif sehingga sampai mencapai hakikat sejati. Berarti perspektif dalam tasawuf imam al-Ghazali memerlukan pengkajian ilmu sains (thabi’iyyat), dan ilmu thabi’iyyat harus ditimbang sebagai wasilah pada puncak tauhid. Epistemologi harus didasarkan pada teologi.
God and Worldview according to al-Attas and Wall
Usmanul Khakim;
Teguh Kurniyanto;
Mahendra Utama Cahya Ramadhan;
Muhammad Habiburrahman;
Muhammad Iksan Rahmadian
TSAQAFAH Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): Islamic Theology
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.4853
This article aims to elaborate the thoughts of al Attas and Thomas F Wall in understanding of God; both of which agree to consider God as a central concept (core belief) in the structure of their theory of worldview. Even so, their concept of God cannot be said to be the same, where al Attas accepts religious institutions (read; Islam) and Wall although apreciated God but rejected religion (agnostic). As a result, both worldviews have different spectrums in the all concepts included concept of reality, human beings and science; where these are rooted in the concept of God. Al Attas and Wall are contemporary philosophers who are concerned in the field of worldview theory, where al Attas presents the Islamic worldview and the Wall as a representation of the Western worldview. This article is a library research using a comparative analysis of the thoughts of two figures; besides that, contain analysis is also needed to interpret what is written in the works of the two scholars. The conclusion of this article is that al Attas' concept of God is based on revelation (khabar sadiq), while Wall builds the concept of God rationally. Al Attas came to the conclusion that God is One; all His perfect attributes exist conclusively, while Wall doubts the existence of God, so Wall attempted to undestand God metaphorically (God as myth).
MEDIA MASSA DAN WACANA PEMIKIRAN ISLAM: Analisis Surat Kabar Islam-Komunis di Minangkabau
Erman Erman;
Aziza Meria;
Sefri Doni;
Lukamanul Hakim
TSAQAFAH Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): Islamic Theology
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.4866
This article aims to analysis mass media and Islamic thought discourse, analysis of Islamic-communist newspapers in Minangkabau. The method used to look at the problem was a historical method with a series of scientific work processes that then succeed in uncovering some findings. First, the Islam-communist newspapers (Pemandangan Islam and Doenia Achirat) were a local mass media deliberately designed by the Islamist-communist group to socialize ideas of Marxism and Islam. Second, both newspapers rolled out several discourses of Islamic thought that included theology, sharia, unity and progress. All this discourse has received serious attention from Islamic scholars in the classical period.
Ibn Arabi on Wahdatul Wujud and it's Relation to The Concept of Af'alul 'Ibad
Dzulfikar Akbar Romadlon;
Nur Hadi Ihsan;
Istikomah Istikomah
TSAQAFAH Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): Islamic Theology
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.4901
Abstract Wahdatul Wujud philosophy is said to have implications for Jabariyah understanding which resulted in the negation of the syari'at. This is because Wahdatul Wujud is understood to be the same as Pantheism. So this research aims to know the implications of Ibn 'Arabi's thought, known as Wahdatul Wujud, on Af'alul' Ibad discourse. This research is descriptive qualitative research using a literature study approach, the researcher will conduct a study of Ibn 'Arabi's works and some related literature. The conclusion of this study, when viewed from the concept of Wahdatul Wujud as believed by Ibn Arabi and his followers, shows that Ibn Arabi believes in the theory of kasb as believed by Imam Al-Ash'ari, that humans have a will to produce actions. However, the human will does not affect the actions. Because only Allah has the power to perform actions. This is consistent with the philosophy of Wahdatul Wujud, that there is no Being except Allah, meaning that there is no action in this world except the act of Allah. Human will and effort belong to man, but only Allah can make it happen. Based on this explanation, it can be concluded that Wahdatul Wujud does not affirm the Jabariyyah concept, which can result in the negation of the Shari'ah. Keywords: Ibn ‘Arabi, Wahdatul Wujud, human action, Allah knowledge.
Relasi Agama dan Ilmu dengan Peradaban Dalam Perspektif Malik Bennabi
Sujiat Zubaidi;
M. Kharis Majid;
Muttaqin Muttaqin
TSAQAFAH Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): Islamic Theology
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.4999
Makalah ini bertujuan untuk menemukan kerangka konsep dari sebuah peradaban dalam pandangan Malik Bennabi. Kajian tentang Malik Bennabi yang berkaitan dengan peranan ilmu dan agama sebagai dasar dari sebuah peradaban belum banyak dilakukan. Padahal Malik Bennabi merupakan seorang sosiolog muslim kontemporer yang sangat fenomal setelah Ibnu Khaldun. Dalam makalah ini metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif analitis, dengan demikian maka penulis mencoba menganalisis corak pemikiran Malik Bennabi yang berkaitan dengan asal-usul munculnya sebuah peradaban, dilihat dari peranan agama dan ilmu di dalamnya. Dalam kajian singkat ini, dapat dilihat bahwa sebuah peradaban terbentuk dari tiga unsur yaitu manusia, tanah dan waktu, yang mana ketiga unsur tersebut saja tidak mampu membentuk sebuah peradaban tanpa adanya katalisator yang disebut dengan agama. Agama sendiri memiliki hubungan yang sangat erat dengan ilmu. Seperti halnya yang ada dalam peradaban Islam, antara agama dan ilmu merupakan sebuah kesatuan yang tidak bisa dipisahkan antara satu dengan lainnya. Lain halnya dengan peradaban Barat yang ternyata agama di Barat sendiri tidak memiliki hubungan yang harmanonis dengan ilmu. Akan tetapi peradaban Barat bisa terwujud karena adanya sekularisme yaitu pemisahan antara agama dengan Ilmu. Dari dua corak peradaban tersebut, setidaknya masing-masing peradaban memiliki hubungan yang sangat erat dengan agama dan juga ilmu, terlepas dari sebesar apa dan bagaimana agama dan ilmu tersebut berperan dalam kemajuan peradaban tersebut.
نبوة محمد عند آنا ماري شيمل (Annemarie Schimmel)
Farhah Farhah;
Ratih Ayu Muflihah Salwa;
Farhan Afif Al-Kindi
TSAQAFAH Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): Islamic Theology
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.5056
AbstractMuhammad in Islam is an example for all Muslims in the world. However, the Orientalist figure has a different view on the Muslims about Muhammad. In Europe, the Prophet Muhammad is seen as an idolater or renamed Mahound (The Dark Soul), known as the Anti-Christ, and a Christian who diverges from his religion. But German Orientalist Annemarie Schimmel has a different look with the most orientalist. He is a Orientalist figure who covers the love of Prophet Muhammad in depth. Seen in describing Muhammad as a worthy model of the example of people all over the world because of its tenderness, goodness, courtesy, politeness and familiarity. Annemarie Schimmel used the method of phenomenology in his research and he tended to use mystical science to adopt the notion of Islamic sufism; such as: Jalaluddin Rumi, Sana'i, Atthar and others who Mengagung-agungkan Prophet Muhammad SAW, showed sincerity and his attention to religion. His view of the Prophet Muhammad and also Muslims in general, he admitted that Muhammad was a good example and also a concluding prophet who had no messenger or other religion after his return. He also acknowledged the prophetic sign of Muhammad such as the Qur'an which was revealed to him, Isra’ Mi'raj and Mu'jizat; Like splitting the moon and her chest split in small time. And he also included the view of scholars and Muslims about the prophetic prophet especially mystical or Sufism.
Benarkah Aristoteles dan Confucius menganut ajaran tauhid?
Much Hasan Darojat
TSAQAFAH Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): Islamic Theology
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.5062
This article aims to delineate the weakness of Osman Bakr's notions who claims that al-Ghazali regarded Aristotle to have tawhidic belief. This opinion may lead to different views because it leads to confusion concerning this great figure of ×ujjat al-Islâm. In al-Ghazali’s various works, the author does not find such a claim. He merely classified the philosophers with their backgrounds, without showing any belief of their monotheistic principles. In addition, the author also refutes Osman's opinion, which says that if a Muslim recognizes Confucius's prophethood, he will not contradict to any Islamic teachings. This opinion seems to invite readers to acknowledge his prophethood even as a Muslim intellectual. These two figures are often the objects of study by number of researchers in the fields of philosophy and religion. However, a Muslim scholar must be able to place them according to their role and contribution critically and carefully. The author concludes that the above-mentioned claims are baseless and inaccurate arguments, so they deserve to be rejected. Number of works by those two figures do not show the arguments of the claim. In this article, the author applies the analytical text and descriptive analysis method by analysing the main sources that are relevant to the context of the issue.
The Critique of Sufism in Ahmad Amin’s Social Theory
Abdul Kadir Riyadi;
Moh. Isom Mudin
TSAQAFAH Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): Islamic Theology
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21111/tsaqafah.v16i2.5079
Ahmad Amin is renown for his reformist ideas. His thought covers a wide range of issues. Nonetheless, little has been done to study his perspective on Sufism. This paper is aimed at filling that gap. As a historian, sociologist and philosopher, Amin has many to offer concerning how Sufism should be treated. The paper argues that like many reformists, Amin is reluctant to accept certain –notably philosophical- aspects of Sufism and regard them as baseless, useless and ahistorical. These should be abandoned as they serve nothing for the Muslim community. His intellectual project is designed to dirent Sufism as a moral –that is Ghazalian- system. But he at the same time also proposes –like Ibn Khaldun- that Sufism should be treated as a means of realising commong good (maslahah) instead of acquiring personal sanctity (karamah). Hence, his critique of Sufism is based on the synthesis between Ghazalian form of paradigm with that of Khaldunian system of thought. While Amin has not paid enough attention to Sufism in his studies, deeper look at his world-view reveals that his interest to this spiritual dimension of Islam is unrivalled