cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
efi@lpem-feui.org
Editorial Address
"Editorial Office of Economics and Finance in Indonesia (EFI) Institute for Economic and Social Research (LPEM-FEUI) Jl. Salemba Raya No. 4, Jakarta, Indonesia Phone: +62-21-3143177; Fax: +62-21-31934310"
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Economics and Finance in Indonesia
Published by Universitas Indonesia
ISSN : 0126155X     EISSN : 24429260     DOI : 10.47291
Core Subject : Economy,
EFI mainly covers original idea related to the Economics and Finance in Indonesia. Published articles can be either theoretical, empirical, or in between of those two polar variants.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Volume 61, Number 3, December 2015" : 5 Documents clear
Managing Productivity in the Infrastructure Sector: A Case Study from Indonesia Eric R. W. Knight; James D. Meade
Economics and Finance in Indonesia Volume 61, Number 3, December 2015
Publisher : Institute for Economic and Social Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (261.436 KB) | DOI: 10.47291/efi.v61i3.515

Abstract

This paper considers the nature of assessing productivity and effectiveness in infrastructure investment in the context of governments’ increasing investment in new infrastructure. Taking the case of energy infrastructure investment within Indonesia, this paper makes three contributions: (i) develops a model for assessing infrastructure productivity based on landscape, regime and niche-level changes, (ii) suggests the interconnection between these levels based on sequencing multi-level changes over time, and (iii) shows the role of supply and demand side initiatives in enabling new infrastructure investment is evaluated.  AbstrakArtikel ini mempertimbangkan sifat dari penilaian produktivitas dan efektivitas pada investasi infrastruktur dalam rangka peningkatan investasi pemerintah pada infrastruktur baru. Dengan menggunakan kasus investasi infrastruktur energi di Indonesia, artikel ini menghasilkan tiga hal: (i) nembangun model untuk menilai produktivitas infrastruktur berdasarkan perubahan dari lanskap, rezim, dan perubahan di level yang tepat, (ii) menunjukkan interkoneksi antar level-level tersebut berdasarkan perubahan multi-level yang berurutan dari waktu ke waktu, dan (iii) menunjukkan peran dari inisiatif sisi penawaran dan permintaan yang memungkinkan investasi infrastruktur baru untuk dievaluasi.Kata kunci: Infrastruktur; Investasi; Produktivitas; Kerangka Perspektif Multi-Level; InovasiJEL classifications: O25; O33; O38
Unequal Impact of Price Changes in Indonesia Rulyusa Pratikto; Mohamad Ikhsan; Benedictus Raksaka Mahi
Economics and Finance in Indonesia Volume 61, Number 3, December 2015
Publisher : Institute for Economic and Social Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (250.821 KB) | DOI: 10.47291/efi.v61i3.511

Abstract

The main idea of this study is to determine the impact of relative inflation on poverty incidents and to investigate whether inflation inequality has occurred in Indonesia. Interesting results were found at regional level. Firstly, Jakarta had different poverty response with respect to price increases. Processed food and transportation inflation were more imperative for the poor in Jakarta. Secondly, the poor in province with low poverty figures were more prone to inflation. In general, the results show that food inflation has the major adverse impact on the poor. Moreover, we found that inflation in Indonesia has not been pro-poor.AbstrakTujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menentukan dampak dari perubahan harga terhadap kemiskinan, serta juga untuk mengetahui apakah terjadi ketimpangan inflasi di Indonesia. Hasil yang menarik diperoleh dari analisa pada tingkat provinsi. Pertama, kemiskinan pada provinsi Jakarta memiliki karakteristik yang berbeda. Inflasi pada makanan jadi dan transportasi justru memiliki dampak yang lebih merugikan masyarakat miskin. Kedua, masyarakat miskin yang berada di provinsi dengan tingkat kemiskinan relatif rendah justru lebih sensitif terhadap inflasi. Secara umum, inflasi bahan makanan merupakan faktor terbesar dalam peningkatan kemiskinan. Selain itu, masyarakat miskin telah mengalami total inflasi yang lebih besar dibandingkan dengan masyarakat tidak miskin.Kata kunci: Kemiskinan; Inflasi; Elastisitas Harga terhadap Kemiskinan; Pro-Poor Price Index; Price Index for the PoorJEL classifications: E3; I3; O1; R2
Determinants of Firm Innovation in Indonesia: The Role of Institutions and Access to Finance Edo Mahendra; Ubaidillah Zuhdi; Ratnawati Muyanto
Economics and Finance in Indonesia Volume 61, Number 3, December 2015
Publisher : Institute for Economic and Social Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (468.258 KB) | DOI: 10.47291/efi.v61i3.512

Abstract

This paper investigates the determinants of firm innovation in Indonesia. Using quality of local regulations index constructed by the Indonesia’s Regional Autonomy Watch (KPPOD) as measure of institutions, We found that better institutional quality at the local level was associated with more innovation and that firms experiencing major obstacle in access to finance were less likely to innovate. Access to finance is more critical for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) whereas institutional quality is more important for large firms. The positive impact of better institutions on innovation is asymmetrically distributed. Better local institutional quality disproportionately benefited non-constrained firms.AbstrakMakalah ini menyelidiki faktor-faktor penentu terjadinya inovasi pada perusahaan di Indonesia. Sebagai proksi kelembagaan digunakan variabel Peraturan Daerah yang dibuat oleh Komite Pemantuan Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah (KPPOD). Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa kualitas kelembagaan yang baik pada tingkat daerah erat kaitannya dengan tingkat inovasi yang lebih tinggi dan perusahaan-perusahaan yang mengalami kendala akses keuangan cenderung tidak melakukan inovasi. Faktor akses keuangan lebih menentukan bagi perkembangan inovasi perusahaan perusahaan kecil dan menengah sedangkan kualitas kelembagaan lebih menentukan bagi perusahaan besar. Dampak positif dari kelembagaan yang baik terhadap tingkat inovasi terdistribusikan secara asimetris dan faktor kelembagaan yang baik lebih berdampak positif terhadap perusahaan yang tidak mengalami kendala keuangan.Kata kunci: Akses Keuangan; Inovasi Perusahaan; Faktor Penentu Inovasi; Kesenjangan Inovasi; KelembagaanJEL classifications: O38; O53; G38
Technical Efficiency Levels of Rural Banks (BPRs) in West Java: A Stochastic Frontier Approach Putu Geniki Lavinia Natih
Economics and Finance in Indonesia Volume 61, Number 3, December 2015
Publisher : Institute for Economic and Social Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (426.977 KB) | DOI: 10.47291/efi.v61i3.513

Abstract

There is considerable evidence from around the world to support the idea that access to formal financial services is a key factor towards achieving poverty alleviation. The government of Indonesia has placed high importance on the issue of improved access to financial services and one feels that it would be appropriate to begin the process of analyzing effective financial inclusion initiatives with the existing Bank Perkreditan Rakyat (BPR) system. BPRs have long been an integral part of Indonesia’s financial, economic, and social development. This research is focused on BPRs in West Java. In this research, the writer evaluates BPR performance within twenty-five districts in West Java, by measuring the technical efficiency levels of the BPRs through employing the Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA). The district that has the highest BPR average inefficiency score is Bandung city and the district with the lowest average BPR inefficiency score is the district of Ciamis. Increases in bank concentration (indicated by the Hirschman-Herfindahl Index) and income per capita are shown to decrease BPR inefficiency levels. Increases in the percentage of the population under the poverty line, the percentage of the labor force with a high school education, the percentage of road length per area, and the amount of bank offices per district, increase the inefficiency levels of BPRs. Overall, it is found that BPRs cannot operate efficiently in areas which are too underdeveloped; neither can they operate efficiently in areas which are too well developed.AbstrakTerdapat bukti substantif pengalaman berbagai negara di dunia bahwa akses pada jasa finansial formal adalah faktor kunci dalam upaya pengentasan kemiskinan. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia telah menempatkan upaya peningkatan mutu dan akses jasa finansial bagi masyarakat Indonesia, sebagai salah satu kebijakan utama dalam pengentasan kemiskinan. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk membahas dan menganalisa efektivitas badan-badan penyedia jasa finansial di Indonesia, sebagai starting-point dengan memulai analisa efektivitas jasa finansial yang diberikan oleh Bank Perkreditan Rakyat (BPR). Penelitian ini difokuskan kepada BPR di Jawa Barat. Penulis mengevaluasi performa BPR pada 25 kabupaten/kota di Jawa Barat, dengan mengukur tingkat efisiensi teknis melalui metode Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA). Kota tempat BPR yang memiliki rata-rata in-efisiensi tertinggi adalah Kota Bandung dan Kabupaten dengan in-efisiensi rata-rata BPR-nya yang terendah adalah Kabupaten Ciamis. Peningkatan dalam konsentrasi perbankan di sebuah kabupaten/kota (terindikasi Hirschman-Herfindahl Index) dan peningkatan pendapatan per kapita pada kabupaten/kota tersebut terbukti menurunkan tingkat inefisiensi BPR. Sebagai kesimpulan utama, ditemukan bahwa BPR tidak dapat beroperasi secara efektif pada area yang sangat underdeveloped dan juga tidak dapat beroperasi efektif pada area yang sangat developed. Kata kunci: Bank Perkreditan Rakyat (BPR); Jawa Barat; Efisiensi Teknis; Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA)JEL classifications: D; L1; L2; G; G2
Oil Exploration Economics: Empirical Evidence from Indonesian Geological Basins Harry Patria; Vid Adrison
Economics and Finance in Indonesia Volume 61, Number 3, December 2015
Publisher : Institute for Economic and Social Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (620.744 KB) | DOI: 10.47291/efi.v61i3.514

Abstract

Oil exploration has been subject to economic research for decades. Earlier studies of exploration models are mostly discussed the behavior of exploration at the macro-level analysis such as field, firm, region, and continental. This paper then focuses on the geological and economic factors that determine the well-drilling decision at the micro-level using disaggregated panel data of 32 geological basins in Indonesia over the period of 2004–2013. This study shows that the number of drilled wells is determined significantly by the lag of success rate, lag of discovery size, lag of global oil price, and regional location of geological basin. AbstrakEksplorasi migas telah menjadi subyek ekonomi dalam beberapa dekade. Studi-studi sebelumnya dengan model eksplorasi, kebanyakan mengembangkan model Fisher (1964), secara umum dikelompokkan oleh persamaan yang menjelaskan respons eksplorasi pada tingkat makro menggunakan lapangan, perusahaan, wilayah, dan kontinental. Paper ini fokus pada analisis faktor-faktor geologi dan ekonomi yang menentukan tingkat sumur pemboran pada tingkat mikro menggunakan data panel dari 32 basin di Indonesia dalam periode 2004–2013. Hasil empiris menunjukkan bahwa tingkat sumur pemboran ditentukan secara signifikan berdasarkan tingkat keberhasilan pemboran, ukuran temuan dan harga minyak pada tahun sebelumnya serta lokasi basin geologis.Kata kunci: Pengeboran; Variabel Geologi; Variabel Ekonomi; EksplorasiJEL classifications: L71; Q35

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5


Filter by Year

2015 2015


Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 68, Number 1, June 2022 Volume 67, Number 2, December 2021 Volume 67, Number 1, June 2021 Volume 66, Number 2, December 2020 Volume 66, Number 1, June 2020 Volume 65, Number 2, December 2019 Volume 65, Number 1, June 2019 Volume 64, Number 2, December 2018 Volume 64, Number 1, June 2018 Volume 63, Number 2, December 2017 Volume 63, Number 1, June 2017 Volume 62, Number 3, December 2016 Volume 62, Number 2, August 2016 Volume 62, Number 1, April 2016 Volume 61, Number 3, December 2015 Volume 61, Number 2, August 2015 Volume 61, Number 1, April 2015 Volume 60, Number 2, 2012 Volume 60, Number 1, 2012 Volume 59, Number 2, 2011 Volume 59, Number 1, 2011 Volume 58, Number 3, 2010 Volume 58, Number 2, 2010 Volume 58, Number 1, 2010 Volume 57, Number 2, 2009 Volume 57, Number 1, 2009 Volume 56, Number 3, 2008 Volume 56, Number 2, 2008 Volume 56, Number 1, 2008 Volume 55, Number 3, 2007 Volume 55, Number 2, 2007 Volume 55, Number 1, 2007 Volume 54, Number 3, 2006 Volume 54, Number 2, 2006 Volume 54, Number 1, 2006 Volume 53, Number 3, 2005 Volume 53, Number 2, 2005 Volume 53, Number 1, 2005 Volume 52, Number 3, 2004 Volume 52, Number 2, 2004 Volume 52, Number 1, 2004 Volume 47, Number 4, 1999 Volume 47, Number 3, 1999 Volume 47, Number 2, 1999 Volume 47, Number 1, 1999 Volume 46, Number 4, 1998 Volume 46, Number 3, 1998 Volume 46, Number 2, 1998 Volume 46, Number 1, 1998 Volume 45, Number 4, 1997 Volume 45, Number 3, 1997 Volume 45, Number 2, 1997 Volume 44, Number 4, 1996 Volume 44, Number 3, 1996 Volume 44, Number 2, 1996 Volume 44, Number 1, 1996 Volume 43, Number 4, 1995 Volume 43, Number 3, 1995 Volume 43, Number 2, 1995 Volume 43, Number 1, 1995 Volume 42, Number 4, 1994 Volume 42, Number 3, 1994 Volume 42, Number 1, 1994 Volume 41, Number 4, 1993 Volume 41, Number 3, 1993 Volume 41, Number 2, 1993 Volume 41, Number 1, 1993 Volume 40, Number 4, 1992 Volume 40, Number 2, 1992 Volume 40, Number 1, 1992 Volume 39, Number 3, 1991 Volume 39, Number 2, 1991 Volume 39, Number 1, 1991 Volume 38, Number 4, 1990 Volume 38, Number 3, 1990 Volume 38, Number 2, 1990 Volume 38, Number 1, 1990 Volume 37, Number 4, 1989 Volume 37, Number 3, 1989 Volume 37, Number 2, 1989 Volume 37, Number 1, 1989 Volume 36, Number 4, 1988 Volume 36, Number 3, 1988 Volume 36, Number 2, 1988 Volume 36, Number 1, 1988 Volume 35, Number 4, 1987 Volume 35, Number 3, 1987 Volume 35, Number 2, 1987 Volume 35, Number 1, 1987 Volume 34, Number 4, 1986 Volume 34, Number 3, 1986 Volume 34, Number 2, 1986 Volume 34, Number 1, 1986 Volume 33, Number 2, 1985 Volume 32, Number 4, 1984 Volume 31, Number 4, 1983 Volume 31, Number 3, 1983 Volume 31, Number 2, 1983 Volume 31, Number 1, 1983 Volume 30, Number 4, 1982 Volume 30, Number 3, 1982 Volume 30, Number 2, 1982 Volume 30, Number 1, 1982 Volume 29, Number 4, 1981 Volume 28, Number 4, 1980 Volume 28, Number 3, 1980 Volume 28, Number 2, 1980 Volume 28, Number 1, 1980 Volume 27, Number 4, 1979 Volume 27, Number 3, 1979 Volume 27, Number 2, 1979 Volume 27, Number 1, 1979 Volume 26, Number 4, 1978 Volume 23, Number 3, 1975 More Issue