cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Samsul Ode
Contact Email
samsul.ode@uta45jakarta.ac.id
Phone
+6282242151689
Journal Mail Official
jurnalpolinter@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta,Jl. Sunter Permai Raya, Sunter Agung Podomoro, Jakarta 14350
Location
Kota adm. jakarta utara,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Polinter
Published by Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta
ISSN : 24067776     EISSN : 24600903     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Polinter merupakan jurnal kajian ilmu politik dan ilmu hubungan internasional yang dikelola oleh Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta. Polinter terbit sebanyak dua kali dalam satu tahun, yaitu pada semester genap dan ganjil. Jurnal ini berusaha mengangkat dan mengkaji terkait Politik Indonesia maupun Politik International. Polinter didirikan pada tahun 2014, diawali dengan jurnal cetak dengan no. ISSN 2406-7776 pada tahun tersebut. Kemudian pada tahun 2015 terbentuk versi elektronik dengan no. EISSN 2460-0903.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 3, No 1 (2017)" : 5 Documents clear
GENERASI MILLENNIAL DAN INOVASI JEJARING DEMOKRASI TEMAN AHOK Retnayu Prasetyanti
JURNAL POLINTER : KAJIAN POLITIK DAN HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL Vol 3, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (494.494 KB) | DOI: 10.52447/polinter.v3i1.756

Abstract

Millennial generation nowadays prominently inspires innovation not only in the development of technology and knowledge but also in the social and political arena. In this fast-changing era, the world can’t resist the trend of digital application and its dissimilar impacts on various realms. Millennial generation, somehow, hit by adverse impacts of the development of technology based digital application; however in another side, this Y generation also gives significant influences on political dynamism in Jakarta. Millennial generation movement known as TEMAN AHOK: a community which supports Ahok to be Independent Candidate of Jakarta Governor 2017 defined as a new trend of political innovation pioneered by millennial generation. By developing a qualitative research as its methodological framework, this research tried to describe the role of millennial generation in managing political network and enhancing democracy. This study also elaborates the expanded effects of millennial generation participation on future political development and policy formulation process in Jakarta and Indonesia. The existence of TEMAN AHOK has been assumed as a critic for government to redefined democracy as a whole process from people, by people, and for people, not from political party, by political party, and for political party.
Reposisi CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) di Indonesia atika saraswati
JURNAL POLINTER : KAJIAN POLITIK DAN HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL Vol 3, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (521.362 KB) | DOI: 10.52447/polinter.v3i1.792

Abstract

CSR discourse (Corporate Social Responsibility) emerged as an effort to built corporate responsibility to the social neighborhood. Accidentally temporal CSR practices rise the stereotype and skepticism of its worked by some ecologists. This paper attempts to reposition CSR in Indonesia as the scutum protecting entity of corporate exploitation. Through an ecopolitical study inspired by Piers Blake's work and concludes with the ethics of care developed by Carol Gilligan, this paper extend the interpretation of CSR as a ‘zoon politicon’ that demands the transformation of its role and practices in symbiotic mutualism with their neighborhood.  
Pembangunan dan Partisipasi Politik di Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru: Dari Teknokratis ke Populis? Anwar Ilmar
JURNAL POLINTER : KAJIAN POLITIK DAN HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL Vol 3, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (379.419 KB) | DOI: 10.52447/polinter.v3i1.796

Abstract

This article is motivated by the emergence of a wave of democratic phenomenon that also hit Indonesia in the late 1990s. The wave of democracy had a strong influence on the emergence of the discourse of strengthening the political participation that was suppressed during the New Order era. The New Order state runs a development model that puts forward the economic aspect rather than politics. Many call it a technocratic development model. This development model is considered successful in carrying out development by adopting policies to tightly control political activities including people's participation in them. However, the formerly revered model of development, suddenly received strong criticism and opposition. Economic development only enjoyed a handful of elites and created social imbalances. In the post-new order era, political participation was enhanced through the strengthening of political parties and elections. The consequence is, the increased participation of the people in the activities of the state. Economic development is also aimed at equal distribution of income. The new post-order development model is often referred to as the populist model. This article concludes that post-New Order development does not fully show a populist model. This is marked by widening economic inequality and political power remains in the hands of a handful of elites such as in the New Order period.  Keyword: Development, Political Participation, Technocratics, Populist
BIKAMERALISME SETEGAH HATI iqbal aidar idrus
JURNAL POLINTER : KAJIAN POLITIK DAN HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL Vol 3, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (384.822 KB) | DOI: 10.52447/polinter.v3i1.797

Abstract

On a bicameral system the DPR and DPD positions should be balanced so that checks and balances to be built can be effective. But unfortunately, the presence of DPD in Indonesian state administration is still considered halfhearted. This is evident from some of his very limited authorities and has absolutely no authority to disconnect except for suggestions, judgments and suggestions. In fact, the legitimacy of DPD is not inferior to DPR members even the requirement to become DPD member candidates should collect 1000 to 5000 signatures and they directly face the people, in contrast to the DPR elected through political parties. This paper looks at how the MPR's relationship with the DPR and DPD is not in the institutional function but is seen from the composition of MPR members consisting of members of DPR and DPD, while the relationship between DPR and DPD is viewed from the institutional function, namely DPD is an institution of consideration or support for the House of Representatives Legislation, consideration, and supervision. The actual parliamentary institution is in the House because it has the functions of legislation, budgetary function and oversight function, and even has a function to give consideration / approval. In carrying out its function, the DPR is given the right of interpellation, right of inquiry and right of opinion. The position of the House becomes very strong because it cannot be frozen or dissolved by the President, thus DPD has a role that is not maximal in performing the functions of check and balances perfectly, Because they do not have veto rights over the bill and are only entitled to propose certain laws only, and the function of consideration and supervision is very dependent and rely on other parties, especially the House and the President.
EFEKTIVITAS BIROKRASI PEMERINTAHAN SEBAGAI LEGALITAS PEMBANGUNAN DEMOKRASI rosa arista narendra
JURNAL POLINTER : KAJIAN POLITIK DAN HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL Vol 3, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (548.468 KB) | DOI: 10.52447/polinter.v3i1.798

Abstract

The bureaucracy exists to bridge the aspects of politics, power and the public interest against the control of the Government in carrying out policies that have direct access with the people. The bureaucracy that has a bad image for the face of Government has always been a discussion of materials to take sides in realizing the reform of the bureaucracy in Indonesia. Bureaucratic reform is expected in an effort to consolidate democracy, where the holder of a democracy can be felt by the people literally. The bureaucracy that is not neutrality affects the joints in the life of the nation and the State, because of its success in bureaucratic neutrality will be legality as the main element in a democratic development. Democratic development will according, if the existence of the effectiveness and efficiency of the bureaucracy that seems to threaten against the mechanisms of making all the decisions.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 10, No 2 (2025) Vol 10, No 1 (2024) Vol 9, No 2 (2024) Vol 9, No 1 (2023) Vol 8, No 2 (2023) Vol 8, No 1 (2022) Vol 7, No 2 (2022) Vol 7, No 1 (2021) Vol 6, No 2 (2021) Vol 6, No 1 (2020) Vol 5, No 2 (2020) Vol 5, No 1 (2019) Vol 4, No 2 (2019) Vol 4, No 1 (2018) Vol 3, No 2 (2018) Vol 3, No 1 (2017) Vol 2, No 2 (2017) Vol 2, No 1 (2016) Vol 1, No 2 (2015) Vol 1, No 1 (2015): Penelitian More Issue