cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mairizwan
Contact Email
mairizwan@unp.ac.id
Phone
+6281363063286
Journal Mail Official
jurnaljppf@gmail.com
Editorial Address
FMIPA, Universitas Negeri Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Fisika
Published by Universitas Negeri Padang
ISSN : 27468445     EISSN : 22523014     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jppf.v7i1.xxxxxx
Core Subject : Education,
Education
Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika adalah jurnal yang berisi artikel-artikel bidang ilmu Pendidikan fisika. Jurnal ini mempublikasikan hasil penelitian yang original. Jurnal ini merupakan suatu sarana publikasi hasil riset dan pengembangannya di bidang pendidikan fisika. Jurnal ini terbit secara berkala sebanyak dua kali dalam setahun. (1) hasil belajar fisika, (2) materi pembelajaran fisika, (3) pembelajaran teori dan model pembelajaran fisika, (4) strategi pembelajaran dan metode pembelajaran fisika, (5) penilaian dan evaluasi pembelajaran fisika, (6) Penggunaan TIK dan media dalam pembelajaran fisika, (7) Manajemen pembelajaran fisika, (8) Penelitian dan pengembangan dalam pembelajaran fisika, (9) Metode eksperimen dalam pembelajaran fisika, (10) Penelitian tindakan pembelajaran fisika. Topik lain yang berkaitan dengan pendidikan fisika
Arjuna Subject : Fisika dan Astronomi - Fisika dan Astronomi (Lain-Lain)
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 1, No 1 (2012)" : 12 Documents clear
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN FISIKA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL GUIDED INQUIRYYANG DILENGKAPI PENILAIAN PORTOFOLIO PADA MATERI GERAK MELINGKAR Chodijah, Siti; Fauzi, Ahmad; Ratnawulan, Ratnawulan
Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika Vol 1, No 1 (2012)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (203.88 KB) | DOI: 10.24036/jppf.v1i1.603

Abstract

KTSP in high school physics teaching requires learning device according to the characteristics of the material. In reality not yet available learning devices that require students to think scientifically and found the concept itself. On the other hand, teachers are expected to conduct classroom-based assessments, one of which is the assessment of the portfolio, a collection of works by students that is organized by interest, progress, achievement, and creativity of students in a specified period. How the development of learning physics using guided inquiry equipped models portfolio assessment in a circular motion of matter has not been developed. The research objective is to develop the learning of physics using guided inquiry equipped models portfolio assessment at the circular motion of matter are valid, practical and effective.This type of research is the development of research using model 4-D. Research procedures are define stage set and define the conditions of learning such as analysis of curriculum, learner analysis and concept analysis. Design phase is to prepare the device prototype stage of learning and development is done validity, and effectiveness of the learning practicality. The validity of the data collection instrument is a validation sheet RPP, modules, worksheets and portfolio assessment. Practicality data collection instruments are observation sheets and questionnaires practicality. Effectiveness of data collection instrument is the observation sheet and portfolio assessment.Validity of test results of the study obtained an average percentage value validation RPP was 84.6%, the module is 82% and LKS is 82.8%, this means that the category of learning is very valid, while the conclusion is valid assessment form without revision. Furthermore, the practicality of obtaining test results mean percentage of the value of practicality by a teacher questionnaire on RPP was 98%, the module is 96.5% and LKS was 96% and the percentage of the average value of the practicality of a questionnaire by the students on the module is 87.4% and LKS is 89.8% with the learning tools category that developed very practical. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the test result is the average value of the class students in the cognitive 66.7, affective domains is 61.2, psychomotor domains is 68 and the percentage of the average effectiveness base students activity is 86,3% . Conclusion of research is learning software developed very valid, very practical and effective.
PERBEDAAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA ANTARA SISWA YANG PEMBELAJARANNYA MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN KONFLIK KOGNITIF DENGAN PENDEKATAN EKSPOSITORI (Studi Kasus pada Pokok Bahasan Impuls dan Momentum di Kelas XI SMA N 1 Lubuk Sikapin Emiliannur, Emiliannur; Ratnawulan, Ratnawulan; Hamdi, Hamdi
Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika Vol 1, No 1 (2012)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jppf.v1i1.594

Abstract

The background of this research is a lack of physics concept understanding. The students who have not yet successed in applying information and knowledge logically, critically, creatively and innovately when making decisions. One of the solution for this problem is by implementating the cognitive conflict approach. The aims of this research are to: (1) investigate the differences cognitive conflict approach with expository approach to the physics learning achievement; (2) investigate the differences cognitive conflict approach with expository approach to student’s critical thinking skill; (3) investigate the relationship between critical thinking and physics learning achievement. This research was quasi experimental research which used Randomized Control Group Only Design. The population in this research is all of XI IPA SMA N 1 Lubuk Sikaping student listed in the 2010/2011 academic year. Samples were determined using cluster random sampling technique, and elected XI IPA 3 as the first experimental class and XI IPA 1 as the second experimental class. The data is collected through the learning achievement test and critical thinking test, and analyzed by t test and Pearson correlation techniques. The results of data analysis indicate that: (1) there is a significant differences of cognitive conflict approach with expository approach to the physics learning achievement, where the cognitive conflict approach can improve physics learning achievement higher than the expository approach; (2) there is a significant differences of cognitive conflict approach with expository approach to student’s critical thinking skill, where the cognitive conflict approach can improve student’s critical thinking skill higher than the expository approach; (3) there is a significant relationship between critical thinking and physics learning achievement. Keywords: Cognitive Conflict Approach, Expository Approach, Critical Thinking Skill, Physics Learning Achievement.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2012 2012


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 7, No 2 (2021) Vol 7, No 1 (2021) Vol 6, No 2 (2020) Vol 6, No 1 (2020) Vol 5, No 2 (2019) Vol 5, No 1 (2019) Vol 1, No 1 (2012)