cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. dr. Puspa Wardhani, SpPK
Contact Email
admin@indonesianjournalofclinicalpathology.org
Phone
+6285733220600
Journal Mail Official
majalah.jicp@yahoo.com
Editorial Address
Laboratorium Patologi Klinik RSUD Dr. Soetomo Jl. Mayjend. Prof. Dr. Moestopo 6-8 Surabaya
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory (IJCPML)
Published by Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Patologi Klinik Indonesia
ISSN : 08544263     EISSN : 24774685     DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.24293
Core Subject : Health, Science,
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience
Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory (IJCPML) is a journal published by “Association of Clinical Pathologist” professional association. This journal displays articles in the Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory scope. Clinical Pathology has a couple of subdivisions, namely: Clinical Chemistry, Hematology, Immunology and Serology, Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Hepatology, Cardiovascular, Endocrinology, Blood Transfusion, Nephrology, and Molecular Biology. Scientific articles of these topics, mainly emphasize on the laboratory examinations, pathophysiology, and pathogenesis in a disease.
Arjuna Subject : Kedokteran - Kedokteran (Lain-Lain)
Articles 23 Documents
 1   2   3 
Search results for , issue "Vol 28, No 1 (2021)" : 23 Documents clear
Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Procalcitonin as Predictors of the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis Dessy Iriana; Ani Kartini; Yuyun Widaningsih; Agus Alim Abdullah
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY Vol 28, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Indonesian Association of Clinical Pathologist and Medical laboratory

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24293/ijcpml.v28i1.1699

Abstract

The Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and procalcitonin are used to indicate systemic inflammation in variousmedical disorders. Both parameters were determined in this study to predict the severity of acute pancreatitis. This studywas a cross-sectional study using a retrospective approach to patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis by using medicalrecord data from patients at Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusoso Hospital, Makassar, from January 2014 to May 2019. This studycomprised 35 patients hospitalized with acute pancreatitis, with a similar proportion of males and females. This studydiscovered that the mean age in this study was 44.17±12.9 years. The most prevalent cause was Gallstones (77.1%), themost severe degree was mild (54.2%), and the highest outcome was survival (77.1%). The NLR (9.93±11.19, p=0.011)increased in proportion to severity. However, additional analysis based on classification of disease severity revealed thatonly mild-severe NLR was significant (p=0.005). Procalcitonin (8.13±11.25, p=0.001) increased along with the increaseddisease severity, and the subsequent analysis showed that the distribution of severity was similar. The NLR can predict theseverity of acute pancreatitis but is less effective than procalcitonin. This study required a more proportional subjectpopulation and consideration of other factors.
D-Dimer Analysis in COVID-19 Patients Rahim Mubarak; Tenri Esa; Yuyun Widaningsih; Uleng Bahrun
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY Vol 28, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Indonesian Association of Clinical Pathologist and Medical laboratory

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24293/ijcpml.v28i1.1812

Abstract

The COVID-19 incidence is increasing around the world. Some countries are experiencing worsening conditions, evendeaths. One coagulation marker that noticeably increases in COVID-19 patients is D-dimer. This study aimed to analyzeD-dimer levels of COVID-19 patients. Retrospective study using medical records of 84 COVID-19 patients, conducted fromApril to August 2020 at UNHAS Hospital. Patients were grouped based on the severity of the disease as non-severe andsevere. D-dimer levels were measured using the Alere Triage® D-dimer with the fluorescent immunoassay method. Thestatistical test used was Mann-Whitney, D-dimer prognostic levels were calculated with ROC analysis to get the cut-off.Significant if the p < of 0.05. The sample consisted of 74 non-severe and ten severe COVID-19 patients, mostly in the 30-39age group. D-dimer levels in non-severe (0.31±0.38 μg/L) significantly differ from severe group (3.09±2.56 μg/L) (p<0.001).The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve showed D-dimer sensitivity and specificity of 90.0% and 89.2%,respectively at the ≥ 0.80 μg/L cut-off, Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 98.5%, and Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of52.9%. D-dimer levels increased in severe COVID-19 patients due to an increased inflammatory response resulting inexcessive thrombin. The ROC D-dimer curve indicated a cut-off rate of 0.80 μg/L, providing optimal sensitivity andspecificity. D-dimer has a significant difference in non-severe and severe COVID-19 patients and shows good value todetermine the severity of COVID-19 disease with a cut-off value ≥ 0.80 μg /L.
Comparison of K2 and K3 EDTA Anticoagulant on Complete Blood Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Harida Zahraini; Yulia Nadar Indrasari; Hartono Kahar
INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY Vol 28, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Indonesian Association of Clinical Pathologist and Medical laboratory

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24293/ijcpml.v28i1.1735

Abstract

The use of anticoagulants is one of the important pre-analytic factors in hematological tests. Both dipotassium (K2) andtripotassium (K3) Ethylene Diamine Tetraacetic Acid (EDTA) are widely used anticoagulants. International CouncilStandardization of Hematology (ICSH) and several researchers recommend the use of K2 EDTA due to its less hyperosmolareffect on blood cells compared to K3 EDTA. This study aimed to compare the results of Complete Blood Count (CBC) andErythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) using anticoagulant K2 EDTA and K3 EDTA. This study was an analytic observationalstudy with a cross-sectional design conducted from April to December 2018. The subject of the study were 103 healthyadults selected by consecutive sampling. Blood samples were collected in both anticoagulant tubes with a volume of 3 mLeach. Samples were tested twice, in the first 0 hours and the next 6 hours using Sysmex XN 1000 and Alifax Roller 20 LC.Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, paired T-test and Wilcoxon rank test were used for statistical analysis. The agreement testbetween both anticoagulants was carried out using the Bland Altman plot for parameters with a significant difference. Therewas a significant difference between both anticoagulants for the parameters of hemoglobin, hematocrit MCV, MCHC, RDW,PDW, MPV, PLC-R, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in both the first and second tests. The agreement test using the BlandAltman plot showed that the difference in these parameters was within the Limit of Agreement (LOA) range of 95%. Thisstudy showed that there were differences in some parameters of complete blood count and erythrocyte sedimentation ratebetween the two anticoagulants (K2 K3 EDTA), but these differences were within the LOA range.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 23

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 32 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 31 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 31 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 31 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 30 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 30 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 30 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 29 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 29 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 29 No. 1 (2022) Vol 29, No 1 (2022) Vol 28, No 3 (2022) Vol. 28 No. 3 (2022) Vol. 28 No. 2 (2022) Vol 28, No 2 (2022) Vol. 28 No. 1 (2021) Vol 28, No 1 (2021) Vol 27, No 3 (2021) Vol. 27 No. 3 (2021) Vol. 27 No. 2 (2021) Vol 27, No 2 (2021) Vol. 27 No. 1 (2020) Vol 27, No 1 (2020) Vol. 26 No. 3 (2020) Vol 26, No 3 (2020) Vol 26, No 2 (2020) Vol. 26 No. 2 (2020) Vol 26, No 1 (2019) Vol. 26 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 25 No. 3 (2019) Vol 25, No 3 (2019) Vol. 25 No. 2 (2019) Vol 25, No 2 (2019) Vol 25, No 1 (2018) Vol. 25 No. 1 (2018) Vol 24, No 3 (2018) Vol. 24 No. 3 (2018) Vol. 24 No. 2 (2018) Vol 24, No 2 (2018) Vol. 24 No. 1 (2017) Vol 24, No 1 (2017) Vol 23, No 3 (2017) Vol. 23 No. 3 (2017) Vol 23, No 2 (2017) Vol. 23 No. 2 (2017) Vol 23, No 1 (2016) Vol 22, No 3 (2016) Vol 22, No 2 (2016) Vol 22, No 1 (2015) Vol 21, No 3 (2015) Vol 21, No 2 (2015) Vol 21, No 1 (2014) Vol 20, No 3 (2014) Vol 20, No 2 (2014) Vol 20, No 1 (2013) Vol 19, No 3 (2013) Vol 19, No 2 (2013) Vol 19, No 1 (2012) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2012) Vol 18, No 3 (2012) Vol. 18 No. 3 (2012) Vol 18, No 2 (2012) Vol 18, No 1 (2011) Vol. 18 No. 1 (2011) Vol 17, No 3 (2011) Vol 17, No 2 (2011) Vol 17, No 1 (2010) Vol 16, No 3 (2010) Vol 16, No 2 (2010) Vol 16, No 1 (2009) Vol 15, No 3 (2009) Vol 15, No 2 (2009) Vol 15, No 1 (2008) Vol 14, No 3 (2008) Vol 14, No 2 (2008) Vol 14, No 1 (2007) Vol 13, No 3 (2007) Vol 13, No 2 (2007) Vol 13, No 1 (2006) Vol 12, No 3 (2006) Vol 12, No 2 (2005) Vol 12, No 1 (2005) More Issue