cover
Contact Name
Mariske Myeke Tampi
Contact Email
-
Phone
+6281291909099
Journal Mail Official
era.hukum@fh.untar.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung M Lt.2 Jl. S. Parman No. 1, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tarumanagara
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum
ISSN : 08548242     EISSN : 25810359     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/era%20hukum
Core Subject : Social,
"Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum" (ISSN 0854 8242 | e-ISSN 2581 0359) merupakan media diseminasi (penyebarluasan) hasil penelitian, analisis putusan maupun kajian ilmiah konseptual dari akademisi maupun praktisi bidang hukum di seluruh Indonesia. "Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum" terbit 2 (dua) kali dalam setahun yaitu pada bulan Juni dan Oktober. "Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum" mencakup tulisan keilmuan dari segala bidang hukum, termasuk tetapi tidak terbatas pada hukum pidana, hukum perdata, hukum internasional, hukum tata negara, dan hukum acara. Aspirasi wawasan regional, nasional maupun internasional terwadahi dalam karya orisinal yang mendasar (fundamental) namun memiliki unsur kebaruan (updated) sehingga karya yang dihasilkan merupakan hasil penalaran sistematis, relevan dan memiliki kontribusi tinggi terhadap pembangunan ilmiah bidang hukum.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 372 Documents
Beyond Suspicion: Proving Market Manipulation Rahma Christabel Abilah; Rasji Rasji
Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol. 22 No. 2 (2024): Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law - Tarumanagara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/erahukum.v22i2.38793

Abstract

A major threat to the integrity, fairness and sustainability of modern day capital markets is market manipulation. Although the existing legal framework prohibits manipulative practices, law enforcement authorities continue to face sophisticated schemes that disguise artificial transactions as legitimate market activities. The study aims to analyse the effects of market manipulation on the Indonesian capital market, identify the challenges related to the detection of manipulative activities and develop an effective evidentiary mechanism to combat modern forms of market abuse. The investigation applies a normative and empirical legal approach to analyse relevant cases of market manipulation, legal provisions and information through interviews with legal experts, regulators and investigators. The results indicate that the major challenges are the inability to identify the transaction patterns, flow of funds, perpetrator’s intent and the magnitude of the financial damage. Law enforcement authorities often find unusual market activities, but the underlying structure of manipulation is not always completely disclosed. This study proposes a comprehensive evidentiary mechanism involving big data surveillance, cross-institutional data integration, behavioural analysis, modern loss quantification, multidisciplinary expertise and enhanced investigative authority. The paper concludes that a systematic, responsive evidential framework can improve law enforcement, protect market integrity and increase investor confidence.
Beyond Suspicion: Proving Market Manipulation Tiffani Aprillya Purba; Rasji Rasji
Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol. 22 No. 2 (2024): Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law - Tarumanagara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/erahukum.v22i2.38795

Abstract

In the case of commercial apartments it is generally the parties who enter into a preliminary agreement before the execution of the final sale deed. Problems arise when the buyer has fully performed the obligations under the preliminary sale and purchase agreement, but the developer does not execute the final deed and does not transfer the ownership certificate. The situation becomes more complicated when the developer exchanges the agreed flat unit through a homologated debt restructuring settlement, which can cause losses to a good-faith buyer. The present study aims to investigate the legal protection to the good faith buyer and the legal remedies that can be taken to settle the disputes arising from the nonperformance of the developer to perform its obligation. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The analysis concerns the legal position of the purchaser, obligations of the developer in contract, and legal remedies available to protect the rights of purchasers. The results indicate that good faith buyers, who have fulfilled their contractual obligations in full, can claim breach of contract, ask for the cancellation of the preliminary sale and purchase agreement, and oppose the homologated settlement agreement when it leads to the loss of their rights. The study concludes that good-faith buyers in commercial flat transactions require effective dispute resolution and appropriate legal remedies to confer legal protection, justice, and certainty.