cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Adinda Putra Pradhana
Contact Email
-
Phone
+628113601619
Journal Mail Official
nsmconline@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. P.B. Sudirman, Dangin Puri Klod, Kec. Denpasar Bar., Kota Denpasar, Bali
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Neurologico Spinale Medico Chirurgico
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26212064     DOI : https://doi.org/10.36444/nsmc
Core Subject : Health, Science,
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience
Neurologico Spinale Medico Chirurgico (NSMC) is an open-access, single-blind peer-reviewed journal, published by Indonesian Neurospine Society (INSS) under the flag of Indonesian Neurosurgery Society (INS) and Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University. NSMC publishes articles which encompass all aspects of basic research/clinical studies. The journal facilitates, bridge and integrate the intellectual, methodological, and substantive diversity of medical knowledge, especially in the field of surgery, neurology, neurosurgery, spine, neuroanesthesia, medicine, and health. The journal appreciates any contributions which promote the exchange of ideas between practising educators and medical researchers all over the world.
Arjuna Subject : Kedokteran - Kedokteran (Lain-Lain)
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2 No 1 (2019)" : 5 Documents clear
Clinical predictors of intra-abdominal lesions in blunt abdominal trauma patients with the conservative treatment I Gede Parwata; Ketut Wiargitha; Nyoman Golden; Desy Permatasari
Neurologico Spinale Medico Chirurgico Vol 2 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Indoscholar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (202.292 KB)

Abstract

Background: Blunt abdominal trauma has a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Assessment of specific clinical symptoms such as abdominal traces, abdominal pain, gross hematuria, pelvic fracture, systolic blood pressure and pulse rate in blunt abdominal trauma patients can predict the presence of intra-abdominal injury, so the use of CT Scan in diagnostics may be selective. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of intra-abdominal lesions in patients with blunt abdominal trauma who were treated conservatively. Material and Method: This study used a cross-sectional design. Samples were taken from the medical records, from January 2015 to December 2016. The total sample was 124 patients, were analyzed using Chi-square and logistic regression. This study has passed ethical clearance from the institutional review board of our University Result: The results showed the mean age of patients was 33 years, the majority of patients were male (74.2%), and a negative CT scan was 39.5%. The clinical predictors of intra-abdominal lesions in CT scan of blunt abdominal trauma patients were: abdominal traces (OR: 11.252; 95% CI: 3.257-38.867; p <0.001), abdominal pain with VAS≥5 (OR : 92.968; 95% CI: 14.604-591,837; p <0.001); and gross hematuria (OR: 9.377; 95% CI: 1.539-57.115; p = 0.015). Pelvic fracture, systolic blood pressure, and pulse rate were not statistically proven. Conclusion: Abdominal traces, abdominal pain, and gross hematuria are clinical predictors of intra-abdominal lesions. Predictors should be taken into consideration in decision making to perform an abdominal CT scan in blunt abdominal trauma patients treated conservatively.
Diagnostic validity of PULP (peptic ulcer perforation) score in predicting mortality in patient with operated perforated peptic ulcer in Sanglah Hospital- Denpasar Inge Kurniawati; I Ketut Wiargitha; Tjokorda Gde Bagus Mahadewa; Bianca Jeanne
Neurologico Spinale Medico Chirurgico Vol 2 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Indoscholar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (379.326 KB)

Abstract

Background: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is one of the most common non-traumatic emergency cases in the emergency unit, and have a high mortality rate, more than 70% in the elderly. Accurate and early identification of high-risk surgical patients with PPU is important for triage and risk stratification. The objective of this study was to evaluate the mortality in patients with operated PPU. Methods: Between January 2015 to December 2016, 50 consecutive patients with PPU who performed laparotomy were studied retrospectively. This study was a diagnostic test to evaluate the validity of PULP (Peptic Ulcer Perforation) score to predict mortality in patient with operated PPU and determine the best cut-off point. Presentation ≥ or < 24 hours, age of 65 years old, the presence of preoperative shock, ASA score, the presence of AIDS or active malignancy, liver failure, concomitant use of steroids and serum creatinine > 14.7 g/dL were evaluated in PULP score. Results: The cut-off point for PULP the score in the present study is > 7, based on the optimal cut-off value, patients could be divided into low-risk patients (a score of < 7 points), and high-risk patients (a score of > 7 points). PULP score had 91.7% sensitivity, 65.4% specificity, and 78% accuracy in this study. Positive predictive value and negative predictive the values were 71% and 89.9%. Conclusion: The PULP score is sensitive to predict the mortality risk in patients operated for perforated peptic ulcer and can assist in risk stratification and triage.
Diagnostic validity of blunt abdominal trauma scoring system (BATSS) on blunt adominal trauma in Sanglah General Hospital, Denpasar, Bali Adityas Sukmadi Karjosukarso; I Ketut Wiargitha; Tjokorda Gde Bagus Mahadewa; Nova Juwita
Neurologico Spinale Medico Chirurgico Vol 2 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Indoscholar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (332.693 KB)

Abstract

Background: Abdominal trauma is the third leading cause of death in trauma patients and can be found in about 7-10% of the total number of trauma cases. The Blunt Abdominal Trauma Scoring System (BATSS) provides a high-accuracy score system for diagnosing injury to intra-abdominal organs in blunt abdominal trauma patients based on clinical features, such as patient history, physical examination, and Focused Assesment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST). This studyaimed to determine the validity of the diagnostic value of BATSS score in cases of blunt abdominal trauma. Method: This research was conducted at Sanglah General Hospital, Denpasar with a total sample of 44 patients. The subjects were abdominal blunt trauma patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This study was a retrospective study to determined the validity of the BATSS score. Result: Of the 44 patients, BATSS score ≥12 was found at 34 (77.3%) and BATTS <12 scores of 10 (22.7%). For groups with BATSS score ≥12, there were 32 (94.11%) patients. As for the group with BATSS score <12, there were 3 (30%) patients with organ rupture. A validity test of BATSS score obtained showed 91.4% sensitivity, 77.77% specificity, positive predictive value 94.1%, negative predictive value 70%. Conclusion: BATSS can be a tool of early identification and stratification of patients at high risk of the occurrence of intra-abdominal organ injury due to blunt abdominal trauma.
Diagnostic validity of Thoracic trauma severity score in patient with blunt thoracic trauma for predicting mortality rate Ngakan Gede Dwija Hermawan; I Nyoman Semadi; I Gede Raka Widiana; Desy Permatasari; Christopher Ryalino
Neurologico Spinale Medico Chirurgico Vol 2 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Indoscholar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (165.314 KB)

Abstract

Introduction: The high incidence of blunt thoracic trauma is still a serious concern in emergency services. Mild to severe cases of blunt thoracic trauma that come to the emergency department are not those that can be considered simple but need to be reviewed for the possibility that can lead to the occurrence of advanced complications. This study aims to predict mortality in patient with blunt thoracic trauma with TTS (Thoracic trauma severity) score. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective study with 52 subjects of blunt thoracic trauma patients treated at our University Hospital from January 2016 to May 2017. Eligible data were collected from medical record analyzed by receiver operating characteristics curve and cross tabulation. Results: The age of the subjects are 48.03±15.62, with male 42 subjects (80.8%) and female ten subjects (19.2%). The mean point of Thoracic trauma severity score (TTSS) was 8.32 ± SD: 2.69. The outcome was three patients dead (5.8%) and 49 patients discharged (94,2%). The sensitivity of TTSS 100 %, specificity 89.7%, positive predictive value (PPV) 37.5%, negative predictive value (NPV) 100%, and accuracy rate 90.3%. Highly sensitivity and specificity results for Thoracic Trauma Severity Score is valid for the screening of Blunt Thoracic Trauma. Conclusion: At 11.5 cut-off point, the TTSS was an excellent tool to predict the mortality rate of patients with blunt thoracic trauma. It has a 100% sensitivity and 89.7% specificity, as well as 37.5% PPV and 100% NPV.
Palliative treatment for multiple spinal metastasis in patient with ovarian cancer Rully Hanafi Dahlan; Sevline Estethia Ompusunggu; Muhammad Kusdiansah; Ismail Baselim
Neurologico Spinale Medico Chirurgico Vol 2 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Indoscholar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (730.954 KB)

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the fourth most common type of female cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women. It is the fourth most common malignancy in women. Management varies depending on the patient condition, so one patient can undergo aggressive decompression and stabilization followed by adjuvant therapy, while others may respond to medication and supportive care. The decision to pursue radical surgical treatment is complex, but the indications are becoming clearer. These include radioresistant tumors, obvious spinal instability, clinically significant neural compression secondary to retropulsed bone or from spinal deformity, intractable pain unresponsive to nonoperative measures, and radiation failure.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5 No 1 (2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2021) Vol 4 No 2 (2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2020) Vol 3 No 2 (2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2019) Vol 2 No 2 (2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019) Vol 1 No 1 (2018) Vol 1 No 3 (2018) Vol 1 No 2 (2018) Supplementary Issue - Conference Abstracts More Issue