cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Yati Nurhayati, SH.,MH
Contact Email
yatinurhayati1904@yahoo.com
Phone
+6281223692567
Journal Mail Official
yatinurhayati1904@yahoo.com
Editorial Address
Jl Adyaksa No.2 Banjarmasin, Kalimantan Selatan, Indonesia.
Location
Kota banjarmasin,
Kalimantan selatan
INDONESIA
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum
Published by Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari
ISSN : 19794940     EISSN : 24770124     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Al - Adl : Jurnal Hukum is a journal that contains scientific writings in the field of law either in the form of research lecturers and the results of studies in the field of law published the first time in 2008 with the period published twice a year. Al - Adl Journal of Law is registered in LIPI with the code E-ISSN 2477-0124 and P-ISSN 1979-4940. Every script that goes into the editorial will be reviewed by reviewers in accordance with the field of knowledge. The review process is not more than 1 month and there is already a decision about whether or not the submission is accepted.This journal provides open access which in principle makes research available for free to the public and will support the largest exchange of global knowledge. Al Adl : Jurnal Hukum publihes twice a year (biannually) on January and July focuses on matters relating to: - Criminal law - Business law - Constitutional law - State Administration Law - Islamic law - The Basic Law
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 18, No 1 (2026)" : 13 Documents clear
MENEROPONG KEPASTIAN PENETAPAN STATUS TERSANGKA DALAM KUHAP BARU Erwin Susilo
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.18487

Abstract

The primary focus of this study is to examine the certainty of suspect status and case resolution at the pre-adjudication stage under the New Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The research addresses two principal issues: first, the regulation of case resolution at the stages of investigation and prosecution under both the Old KUHAP and the New KUHAP; and second, the critique and reconstruction of pre-adjudication case resolution models necessary to prevent the recurrence of injustices that characterized the Old KUHAP regime. This study employs normative legal research using four approaches, namely statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case-based approaches. The findings reveal that although the New KUHAP has introduced a more structured coordination mechanism between Investigators and Public Prosecutors within the framework of an Integrated Criminal Justice System, it continues to exhibit legal lacunae. These shortcomings are evident in the absence of regulation concerning the legal consequences of exceeding the prescribed time limit for the initial examination of case files (Article 61), as well as the lack of clarity regarding the commencement point (dies a quo) for calculating the time period for case transfer to the court (Articles 70 and 75). Such conditions may result in the prolonged and uncertain status of suspects, thereby contravening the presumption of innocence, the principle of legal certainty (litis finiri oportet), and the principle of a speedy, simple, and cost-effective trial. This study recommends normative reconstruction through the harmonization of time-limit regulations, the clarification of legal consequences, and the strengthening of judicial oversight through pretrial mechanisms to ensure adequate legal protection for suspects.
MENGHADAPI TANTANGAN KEAMANAN SIBER PADA INFRASTRUKTUR KRITIS: SOLUSI HUKUM DAN ETIKA Ismail Darmawan; Muharman Lubis
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.19925

Abstract

In an increasingly advanced digital era, critical infrastructure underpins numerous aspects of human life, including energy, transportation, communications, and healthcare services. This paper delineates the principal challenges confronting cybersecurity in critical infrastructure, encompassing technological vulnerabilities, insufficient human resources, and inadequate regulatory frameworks. The research methodology involves an examination of applicable legislative regimes, with particular attention to Indonesia’s Electronic Information and Transactions Law (Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik/UU ITE) and the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The findings indicate that, although existing legal frameworks provide a robust foundation for combating cybercrime, regulatory modifications and enhancements remain necessary to address evolving threats. The study underscores the importance of collaboration between the public and private sectors in formulating effective cybersecurity strategies. It concludes that safeguarding critical infrastructure must be accorded priority and that an ethical approach to cybersecurity is essential for sustaining public trust.
REKONSTRUKSI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KREDITUR KONKUREN DALAM SISTEM KEPAILITAN INDONESIA: TELAAH KEADILAN DISTRIBUTIF DAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM Gilang Fitri Hermawan; Djoni Sumardi Gozali; Saprudin Saprudin
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i1.20422

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legal standing of concurrent creditors within the Indonesian bankruptcy regime and to formulate a reconstruction model of legal protection that is more equitable without undermining legal certainty and efficiency. Concurrent creditors have traditionally occupied the lowest tier of priority, subordinate to secured and preferred creditors, resulting in the frequent marginalization of their rights. Employing normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study finds that the normative configuration of Law Number 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (UUK–PKPU) continues to place concurrent creditors in a weak and subordinated position. The practice of distributing bankruptcy estates further reveals the dominance of secured creditors, the expansion of preferential claims, limited transparency on the part of curators, and inconsistencies in judicial decisions, all of which undermine legal certainty and distributive justice for concurrent creditors. As a remedial measure, this study proposes a reconstruction of legal protection through the establishment of minimum rights for concurrent creditors, restrictions on secured creditors’ execution rights, reform of preferential mechanisms, enhancement of curator transparency, strengthening of judicial oversight, promotion of consistency in court decisions, and revision of the UUK–PKPU by incorporating best practices from bankruptcy systems in other jurisdictions. This reconstruction is expected to reinforce the position of concurrent creditors while simultaneously preserving legal certainty and efficiency within Indonesia’s bankruptcy law framework.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18, No 1 (2026) Vol 17, No 1 (2025) Vol 16, No 2 (2024) Vol 16, No 1 (2024) Vol 15, No 2 (2023) Vol 15, No 1 (2023) Vol 14, No 2 (2022) Vol 14, No 1 (2022) Vol 13, No 2 (2021) Vol 13, No 1 (2021) Vol 12, No 2 (2020) Vol 12, No 1 (2020) Vol 11, No 2 (2019) Vol 11, No 1 (2019) Vol 10, No 2 (2018) Vol 10, No 1 (2018) Vol 9, No 3 (2017) Vol 9, No 2 (2017) Vol 9, No 1 (2017) Vol 8, No 3 (2016) Vol 8, No 2 (2016) Vol 8, No 1 (2016) Vol 7, No 14 (2015) Vol 7, No 13 (2015) Vol 6, No 12 (2014) Vol 6, No 11 (2014) Vol 5, No 10 (2013) Vol 5, No 9 (2013) More Issue