cover
Contact Name
Putri Keumala Sari
Contact Email
putkemalasari@gmail.com
Phone
+6282214066169
Journal Mail Official
putkemalasari@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Alue Peunyareng, Ujong Tanoh Darat, Meureubo, Kabupaten Aceh Barat, Aceh 23681, Indonesia
Location
Kab. aceh barat,
Aceh
INDONESIA
Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan
Published by Universitas Teuku Umar
ISSN : 26145723     EISSN : 26206617     DOI : 10.35308
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Ius Civile intents to publish issues on law studies and practices in Indonesia covering several topics related to International Law, Environmental Law, Criminal Law, Private Law, Islamic Law, Agrarian Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Law, Constitutional Law, Human Rights Law, Civil Procedural Law and Adat Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 12 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 1 (2018): April" : 12 Documents clear
STUDI KOMPARATIF MEKANISME PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PRESIDEN REPUBLIK INDONESIA SEBELUM DAN SESUDAH AMANDEMEN UUD 1945 Eza Aulia
Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 2, No 1 (2018): April
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (277.093 KB) | DOI: 10.35308/jic.v2i1.647

Abstract

With regard to the principle of popular sovereignty embraced by Indonesia, there is an obligation that must be done by the president as head of government to be accountable for all policies or actions related to his position to the people as the holder of the highest sovereignty, after the amendment to the constitution of the state, there is a change in the mechanism of responsibility of the president . The problem of this research is whether the similarities and material related to the mechanism of responsibility of the president before and after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution. The result of this research is that there are equations that are both doing political accountability to the people's representative institution based on the supervisory function through the right of inquiry. In contrast, there are differences in the mechanism of accountability in which before the amendment put forward the political accountability of the implementation of the GBHN, whereas after the amendment more to the legal accountability as regulated in the 1945 Constitution after the amendment. It is recommended that there be a certain regulation and mechanism related to the presidential political responsibility, so that the mechanism can assess the performance of the President against the implementation of RPJM, which has been done by the president only in the form of speech on the basis of the existing constitutional convention.Keywords : Comparison, Responsibility of the President.
ALAT BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM HUKUM ACARA DI INDONESIA M. Iqbal Tarigan
Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 2, No 1 (2018): April
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (176.85 KB) | DOI: 10.35308/jic.v2i1.676

Abstract

Proof is very useful in law events in Indonesia. Electronic evidence may have legal force if information can be given wholly, accountable, accessible and can integrate existing processes. In the measurement section of the evidentiary system in Indonesia it has been proven that electronic evidence is evidence of documentary evidence or letter proof. Therefore, in its use, it is important to know what types can be used as evidence in the trial.Keywords: Evidence, Electronic Evidence and  Law of Procedure

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12