cover
Contact Name
Abd Kahar Muzakkir
Contact Email
muzakkir.abd.kahar@gmail.com
Phone
+6282291222637
Journal Mail Official
jurnal_alishlah@umi.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia. Jalan Urip Sumoharjo KM.5 Makassar, Sulawesi-Selatan, Indonesia
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
AL-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
ISSN : 14109328     EISSN : 26140071     DOI : https://doi.org/10.56087/aijih.v25i2
Core Subject : Social,
Al-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum adalah jurnal peer review yang diterbitkan dua kali setahun Mei dan November oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muslim Indonesia sejak Tahun 1998, dimaksudkan untuk menjadi jurnal untuk penerbitan hasil penelitian tentang hukum baik studi empiris dan normatif, terutama dalam masalah hukum kontemporer. Berbagai topik tetapi tidak terbatas pada: 1. Hukum Pidana 2. Hukum Konstitusi 3. Hukum Perdata dan Komersial 4. Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia 5. Hukum Ekonomi 6. Hukum Internasional 7. Hukum Islam atau Syariah 8. Hukum Adat 9. Hukum Lingkungan 10. Pendidikan Hukum 11. Hukum Komparatif Jurnal ini bertujuan terutama untuk memfasilitasi dan menyediakan forum bagi para sarjana hukum dan profesional untuk membahas dan mempromosikan perkembangan terkini tentang masalah hukum di seluruh dunia, diterbitkan dalam bahasa Indonesia, dan tinjauan ini berupaya memperluas batasan wacana hukum Indonesia untuk mengakses kontributor dan pembaca di seluruh dunia. Oleh karena itu, tinjauan ini menerima kontribusi dari para sarjana dan profesional hukum internasional serta dari perwakilan pengadilan, penegak-penegak hukum, otoritas eksekutif, pemerintah, dan lembaga kerjasama pembangunan.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 25 No 2: Juni - November 2022" : 5 Documents clear
Peranan Alat Bukti Tambahan: Studi Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Muh. Nasir; Bambang Nurdiantoro
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 25 No 2: Juni - November 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/aijih.v25i2.363

Abstract

This research aims to examine and analyze the additional proof role and the factors that influence it in eradicating the criminal act of corruption. This research uses empirical legal research methods. The primary data collection was carried out using a questionnaire, while the secondary data was collected using literature study techniques. The data obtained in this research is then quantified using a quantitative descriptive analysis model, then described using a frequency distribution table for answer research purposes. The results show that additional proof has a very large role in eradicating the criminal act of corruption. In this case, the scope of proof regulated in Law No. 8 of 1981 is still limited, while Article 26A of Law No. 20 of 2001 is quite broad. Furthermore, the factors of legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture also significantly affect the use of additional proof in eradicating the criminal act of corruption. Therefore, it is recommended that the House of Representatives amend Law No. 8 of 1981 regarding the additional proof. Furthermore, it is recommended that law enforcers pay attention to the details of the additional proof regulated in Article 26A of Law No. 20 of 2001 to maximize the eradication of the criminal act of corruption in Indonesia.
Pengawasan dan Pengamatan Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan: Studi Kasus Tindak Pidana Anak Andi Purnawati; Ilham Ilham
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 25 No 2: Juni - November 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/aijih.v25i2.364

Abstract

This study aims to determine the role of the Supervisor and Observer Judge and to analyze the factors influencing the implementation of Court Decisions against child crimes in the Class IIA Penitentiary of Maros. This research uses empirical legal research methods. The primary data collection was carried out using a questionnaire, while the secondary data was collected using literature study techniques. The data obtained in this research is quantified using a quantitative descriptive analysis model, then described using a frequency distribution table for answer research purposes. The results show that the role of the Supervisor and Observer Judge is not limited to supervising and observing child convicts during their punishment period at the Penitentiary but also supervising and observing child convicts after they leave the Penitentiary or have finished their punishment period and return to society. Furthermore, three dominant factors influence the implementation of Court Decisions against child crimes in the Class IIA Penitentiary of Maros: the law enforcer factor, the facilities factor, and the community factor. Awareness of child convicts as a community factor has positively influenced the implementation of the Maros District Court Decision. Therefore, it is recommended for the Supervisor and Observer Judge to maximize their role. In this case, the role of the judge must supervise and observe the activities of child convicts and the role of Correctional Officers in implementing Court Decisions in the Class IIA Penitentiary of Maros. In addition, it is suggested to the Minister of Law and Human Rights make regulations regarding the proportion of the Supervisor and Observer Judge to the number of convicts in the Penitentiary so that the implementation of Court Decisions can run optimally in the future.
Peran Intelijen terhadap Permasalahan Orang Asing di Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan: Studi Kasus Penegakan Hukum Hendrik F. Siregar; Sayid Ali Zainal Abidin Assegaf
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 25 No 2: Juni - November 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/aijih.v25i2.365

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the effectiveness of the Role of Intelligence and the factors influencing law enforcement against foreigner problems in South Sulawesi Province. This research uses empirical legal research methods. The primary data collection was carried out using a questionnaire, while the secondary data was collected using literature study techniques. The data obtained in this research is quantified using a quantitative descriptive analysis model, then described using a frequency distribution table for answer research purposes. The results show that the role of Intelligence in law enforcement against foreign problems consists of administrative control and field surveillance. The implementation of these two roles has been less effective in South Sulawesi Province. As for what influences the role of Intelligence in law enforcement against foreigner problems, it consists of three dominant factors: legal factor, law enforcer factor, and cultural factor. These three factors are less influential in supporting Intelligence’s role. This condition simultaneously answers the problem regarding the role of Intelligence which is less effective against foreign problems in South Sulawesi Province. Therefore, it is recommended for the Ministry of Law and Human Rights strengthen the Foreign National Oversight Team’s position based on the MoLHR Regulation. In addition, the Ministry must provide an adequate budget allocation to the Foreign National Oversight Team regarding the need to provide complete facilities to support the role of field surveillance. Furthermore, Intelligence personnel in the Foreign National Oversight Team must ensure that information is up to date so that it can make strategic decisions and policies. Thus, the effectiveness of the role of Intelligence in law enforcement against foreigner problems in South Sulawesi Province can be realized in the future.
Prinsip Mendengarkan Kedua Belah Pihak di Pengadilan Negeri Sinjai: Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Irmawaty Irmawaty; Mushawwir Burhany
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 25 No 2: Juni - November 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/aijih.v25i2.366

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the application of the principle of audi et alteram partem in Decision No. 01/Pdt.G.S/2016/PN.Snj. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statute approach. The collection of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials is carried out using literature study techniques. The collected legal material is then analyzed using qualitative data analysis methods with a statute approach to describe court decisions and answer study purposes. The results show that the Sinjai District Court has summoned Defendant legally and worthy twice. The summons manifests the Judge’s attitude to apply the principle of audi et alteram partem. In this case, the Judge must listen to both sides before deciding a civil case in court. In contrast, Defendant has not shown good faith, while the Sinjai District Court has summoned Defendant legally and worthy twice. Furthermore, the summons made by the Sinjai District Court also aims to mediate between Plaintiff and Defendant. On the other hand, with the efforts made by the Sinjai District Court, the trial process continues to the evidentiary stage even though the Defendant is not present. The proving process does not eliminate the essence of the audi et alteram partem principle, which is to be listened to by both sides. Therefore, it is recommended to establish new laws and regulations in the legal civil field because there are still laws and regulations that apply in Indonesia, which are a relic of the Dutch colonial era. In addition, the renewal of laws and regulations must pay attention to the audi et alteram partem as one of the principles that require Judges to listen to both sides in civil cases. Furthermore, Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2019, as a basis for resolving civil cases through the procedure for simple lawsuits, should be improved because it is formed not in the Supreme Court Regulation but in a higher hierarchy of laws and regulations.
Penyidikan terhadap Tersangka Pemalsuan Surat-Surat: Studi Kasus di Polda Sulawesi Selatan Susi Aryani Manangin; La Ode Husen; Abd. Kahar Muzakkir; Abd. Rasjak
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 25 No 2: Juni - November 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/aijih.v25i2.367

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness and obstacles of investigations on suspect forgery of documentary evidence instruments of land rights at the Directorate of the General Criminal Investigation of South Sulawesi Regional Police. This research combines normative juridical and empirical research methods. The primary data were collected using direct interviews, while the secondary data was collected using literature study techniques. The data obtained in this research were then analyzed qualitatively to describe problems and answer study purposes. The results show that the effectiveness of investigations on suspect forgery of documentary evidence instruments of land rights at the Directorate of the General Criminal Investigation of South Sulawesi Regional Police consists of the investigator's role, the document's validity, and the facilities. In contrast, inhibiting factors of investigations on suspect forgery of documentary evidence instruments of land rights at the Directorate of the General Criminal Investigation of South Sulawesi Regional Police consist of the factor of witness testimony and the legal culture of the community. Therefore, it is recommended that the Government conduct legal counseling to the public to create legal awareness to obey and comply with the laws and regulations that have been in force for the realization of legal purposes in the future.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5