cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Prodi Penelitian & Evaluasi Pendidikan, Pascasarjana UNNES
Contact Email
jere@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jere@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Postgraduate, Universitas Negeri Semarang Kelud Utara III, Semarang 50237 Indonesia
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation
Published by Universitas Negeri Semarang
ISSN : 22526420     EISSN : 25031732     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15294/jere
Core Subject : Education,
Education
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation is a fully refereed international journal publishing original academic articles that promote educational processes and outcomes that are both well-informed and evidence-based. The journal is deliberately multi-disciplinary and broad in its scope, and addresses rigorous research and evaluation at all levels, and in all sectors and ages of education. The journal publishes papers which report results of: original research and evaluation studies; secondary analyses of existing (international) data sets; meta-analyses and reviews synthesizing evidence and guidelines for practice. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation also invites articles about the use and evaluation of evidence in practice, theoretical, conceptual, methodological and substantive issues in research and evaluation, as well as position papers related to issues about evidence-based education.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 4 No 2 (2015)" : 12 Documents clear
PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN UNJUK KERJA PRAKTIK PERAWATAN KULIT WAJAH BERBASIS KOMPETENSI DI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 4 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh kenyataan belum adanya instrumen penilaian perawatan kulit wajah yang baku, belum diuji validitas dan reliabilitas. Instrumen penilaian praktik yang digunakan oleh dosen pengampu mata kuliah perawatan kulit wajah masih bersifat holistic/menyeluruh atau belum terstruktur. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan instrumen. Uji validitas isi menggunakan rata-rata hasil penilaian dan perhitungan reliabilitas para ahli menggunakan anova satu jalur. Untuk mengetahui hasil validitas konstruk dan reliabilitas secara empirik yaitu menggunakan analisis faktor pendekatan exploratory dan alpha (α) cronbach. Hasil validitas isi pengembangan instrumen penilaian unjuk kerja praktik perawatan kulit wajah menurut para ahli masuk pada kategori sangat baik dan hasil perhitungan reliabilitas menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan signifikan antara ke-lima ahli dalam menilai isi instrumen. Pengujian reliabilitas pada koefisien Alpha Cronbach pada uji coba 2 memiliki tingkat reliabilitas yang lebih tinggi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian berupa instrumen penilaian yang valid dan reliabel maka disarankan kepada seluruh dosen pengampu pada Prodi Pendidikan Tata Rias untuk dapat menggunakan instrumen penilaian unjuk kerja praktik perawatan kulit wajah. This research is motivated by the fact the lack of standardized assessment instruments of facial skin care, has not been tested for validity and reliability. Practice assessment instruments used by lecturers in facial skin care subjects was still holistic/comprehensive or not structured. This research was the development of the instrument. The results of construct validity and empirical reliability which use exploratory factor analysis and alpha (α) cronbach. Results of the content validity of the development of performance assessment instrument of facial skin care practice according to experts belong to the category of very good and the reliability of calculation results showed that there were no significant differences between the five experts in assessing the content of the instrument. Based on these data, it can be concluded that the indicator of instrument performance assessment of facial skin care practices declared invalid. The reliability testing on the Alpha Cronbach coefficient trial 2 had a higher level of reliability. Based on the results of research in the form of assessment instruments which are valid and reliable it is recommended to all lecturers on Makeup Education Programme to be able to use an assessment instrument performance practice of facial skin care.This research is motivated by the fact the lack of standardized assessment instruments of facial skin care, has not been tested for validity and reliability. Practice assessment instruments used by lecturers in facial skin care subjects was still holistic/comprehensive or not structured. This research was the development of the instrument. The results of construct validity and empirical reliability which use exploratory factor analysis and alpha (α) cronbach. Results of the content validity of the development of performance assessment instrument of facial skin care practice according to experts belong to the category of very good and the reliability of calculation results showed that there were no significant differences between the five experts in assessing the content of the instrument. Based on these data, it can be concluded that the indicator of instrument performance assessment of facial skin care practices declared invalid. The reliability testing on the Alpha Cronbach coefficient trial 2 had a higher level of reliability. Based on the results of research in the form of assessment instruments which are valid and reliable it is recommended to all lecturers on Makeup Education Programme to be able to use an assessment instrument performance practice of facial skin care.
PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIS GURU SMP DALAM KURIKULUM 2013 MENURUT PERSEPSI GURU DI KOTA SALATIGA
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 4 No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pengembangan Instrumen Kompetensi Guru dalam mengimplementasikan Kurikulum 2013 pada Guru merupakan kebutuhan mendesak karena dapat digunakan sebagai panduan bagi guru untuk menilai (evaluasi) dirinya sendiri secara objektif dan jujur. Bentuk instrumen yang dikembangkan adalah instrumen penilaian (evaluasi) kompetensi pedagogis dan kompetensi profesional guru. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan instrumen penilaian (evaluasi) diri kompetensi pedagogis dan kompetensi profesional yang valid dan reliabel yang diimplementasikan pada guru-guru di SMP di Kota Salatiga. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Reseach and Development (R & D) dengan langkah-langkah teori Borg and Gall yaitu (1) studi pendahuluan,  (2) perancangan, (3) pengembangan, (4) uji terbatas, (5) revisi hasil uji terbatas, (6) uji coba lapangan lebih luas, (7) revisi uji coba lapangan lebih luas, (8) uji kelayakan, (9) revisi hasil uji kelayakan, (10) Deseminasi (tidak dilakukan). Variabel Penelitian ini adalah kompetensi pedagogis dan kompetensi profesional guru. Pengumpulan Data melalui metode kualitatif, dokumentasi dan penilaian (evaluasi) diri melalui angket. Analisis data kualitatif digunakan untuk memperoleh data pendahuluan, sedangkan perolehan data uji coba dan pengembangan digunakan analisa kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) penilaian (evaluasi) diri kompetensi pedagogis dan kompetensi profesional guru di Kota salatiga belum memiliki instrumen khusus, tetapi masih terbatas pada penilaian subjektif kepala sekolah ataupun pengawas. (2) Instrumen yang dikembangkan berupa instrumen penilaian (evaluasi) diri kompetensi pedagogis dan kompetensi profesional. (3) Instrumen valid secara isi ditunjukkan dengan presentase skor penilaian validator 94,28 % untuk kompetensi pedagogis dan 92,14 untuk kompetensi profesional serta valid secara konstruk yang ditunjukkan dengan nilai koefisien korelasi lebih besar dari 0,3 dan reliabel yang ditunjukkan oleh besaran nilai koefisien reliabilitas 0,939 untuk kompetensi pedagogis dan 0,945 untuk kompetensi profesional.(4) Instrumen penilaian (evaluasi) diri kompetensi pedagogis dan kompetensi profesional yang dikembangkan mudah dipahami dari segi bahasa, konstruk sehingga praktis digunakan. Development of Self-Evaluation Instrument Related Master Teacher Competency Achievement and implementation of Curriculum 2013 at the Master is an urgent need because it can be used as a guide for teachers to assess (evaluate) self-competence of teachers. Developed forms of instruments are the instruments of assessment (evaluation) pedagogical competence and professional competence of teachers. This research aims to develop assessment instruments (evaluation) self pedagogical competence and professional competence valid and reliable are implemented in junior high school in Salatiga.  The results showed that (1) assessment self pedagogical competence and professional competence of teachers in the City salatiga not have a special instrument, but is still limited to subjective assessment principals or supervisors. (2 ) The instrument was developed in the form of an assessment instrument (evaluation) self pedagogical competence. (3) Instruments valid contents indicated by the percentage of 94.28% validator assessment scores for pedagogical competence as well as the valid construct as indicated by the value of the correlation coefficient greater than 0.3 and reliably indicated by the magnitude of the value reliability coefficient of 0.939 for pedagogical competence. (4) Instruments assessment (evaluation) self pedagogical competence and developed easily understood as expressed validator practitioners and teachers as rateers.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Article In Process (August 2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) 2021: Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue