cover
Contact Name
Zainal Azwar
Contact Email
al-ahkam@uinib.ac.id
Phone
+6282172124966
Journal Mail Official
al-ahkam@uinib.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Jenderal Sudirman No.15, Padang Pasir, Padang Barat. Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal AL-AHKAM
ISSN : 20868243     EISSN : 27226549     DOI : -
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
Fokus kajian jurnal ini berkaitan dengan kajian hukum Islam dengan segala aspek yang berkaitan dengannya. Jurnal ini menampung semua bentuk artikel ilmiah yang berkaitan dengan kajian hukum Islam yang mencakup artikel penelitian, baik normatif-doktrinal dan empiris, dalam disiplin hukum Islam yang meliputi: Yurisprudensi Islam (Fiqh), Teori Hukum Islam (Usul al-Fiqh), Hukum di Dunia Muslim Modern (Legislasi / Kodifikasi, Statuta, Peraturan, Profesi Hukum, dan Lembaga), dan Hukum Komparatif, Hukum & Agama, atau Hukum & Masyarakat yang bersinggungan dengan Hukum Islam.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 1 Documents
Search results for , issue "vol 16, no 2 (2025)" : 1 Documents clear
Comparison of Administrative Court Systems between Diwan al-Mazhalim in Saudi Arabia and State Administrative Courts in Indonesia Siti Mardiyah
Jurnal AL-AHKAM Vol 16, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/alahkam.v16i2.11719

Abstract

This study aims to examine and compare the administrative justice systems of the Diwan al-Mazhalim in Saudi Arabia and the Administrative Court (PTUN) in Indonesia to understand how Islamic law and modern legal frameworks shape judicial governance. Using the theory of comparative law and legal system theory as analytical foundations, the research employs a qualitative-descriptive approach through a comprehensive review of constitutional texts, statutory laws, and scholarly literature. The analysis reveals that the Diwan al-Mazhalim, operating under the direct authority of the King, embodies a theocentric system grounded in Sharia principles, prioritizing moral and religious dimensions of justice. Conversely, Indonesia’s State Administrative Courts reflects a state-centered legal system based on constitutionalism and the rule of law, emphasizing legality, procedural fairness, and good governance. The findings highlight that while both institutions aim to safeguard citizens’ rights and ensure administrative accountability, they differ in their philosophical foundations and institutional orientations. The study contributes to comparative administrative law by providing a conceptual framework for harmonizing Islamic ethical principles with modern administrative justice, offering valuable insights for reforming legal systems in Muslim-majority countries seeking balance between divine law and state regulation.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 1