cover
Contact Name
Dr. Engkus Ainul Yakin, S.Pt., M.Sc
Contact Email
bantara.animal.science@gmail.com
Phone
+6287839966222
Journal Mail Official
bantara.animal.science@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Letjen. S. Humardani No. 1 Jombor Sukoharjo
Location
Kab. sukoharjo,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Bantara Journal of Animal Science
ISSN : 26569701     EISSN : 26571587     DOI : https://doi.org/10.32585/bjas.v2i1.645
Focus and Scope The aim of this journal is to publish original research in animal science and veterinary including livestock production, management and environment, breeding and genetics, livestock yield technology, and socio-economic livestock, wild animal, veterinary sciences, anatomy, histology, physiology, pharmacology, parasitology, microbiology, epidemiology, veterinary public health, pathology, reproduction, clinic veterinary and biotechnology
Articles 101 Documents
Effects of Different Local Commercial Feeds on the Performance of Layer Chickens at Zacky Farm, Blitar Bagaskara, Muhammad Zacky Putra; Samur, Salnan Irba Novaela; Rahmawati, Resti Yuliana
Bantara Journal of Animal Science Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): BJAS
Publisher : Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32585/bjas.v7i1.6470

Abstract

This study assessed the Performance of layer chickens fed with different local commercial feeds at Zacky Farm. The research was conducted at Zacky Farm, Kanigoro District, Blitar Regency, from October 2024 to November 2024. An experimental research method was employed, with a Completely Randomized Design (CRD). Data analysis was performed using One-Way ANOVA, followed by Duncan's Multiple Range Test if significant differences were found. The study included four treatments: P1 (brand J commercial feed), P2 (brand D commercial feed), and P3 (brand S commercial feed). Each treatment had five replications, with five-layer chickens per replication, resulting in a total population of 75-layer chickens. The results showed significant differences (P<0.05) between treatments P1, P2, and P3 for Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) and Feed Intake (FI), which were 2.25; 3.08; 2.23 and 116.99 g/chicken/day; 155.014 g/chicken/day; 114.52 g/chicken/day, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed (P>0,05) for Hen Day Production (HDP), which were 92.40%, 92.40%, and 91.80%. This study concludes that the best Performance was observed in treatment P3, with an FCR of 2.23, an FI of 114.52 g/chicken/day, and an HDP of 91.80%.

Page 11 of 11 | Total Record : 101