cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ristiyan Ragil Putradianto
Contact Email
ristiyan@upnyk.ac.id
Phone
+6285292102888
Journal Mail Official
jurusan_tm_ftm@upnyk.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jln. Padjajaran 104 (Lingkar Utara), Condong Catur, Depok, Sleman, DIY (55283)
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Journal of Petroleum and Geothermal Technology
Published by Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
ISSN : 27230988     EISSN : 27231496     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31315/jpgt.v1i1
Core Subject : Science, Engineering,
Earth & Planetary Sciences Energy Engineering
Journal of Petroleum and Geothermal Technology (JPGT) is a journal managed by Petroleum Engineering Department, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta. This Journal focuses on the petroleum and geothermal engineering including; reservoir engineering, drilling engineering and production engineering.
Arjuna Subject : Teknik (semua kategori) - Teknik (Lain-Lain)
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 1 (2021): May" : 5 Documents clear
Evaluation And Optimization Production Of Low Permeability Carbonate Reservoir By Hydraulic Fracturing In “Jaso Field” Jakfar Sodi; Dyah Rini Ratnaningsih; Dedy Kristanto
Journal of Petroleum and Geothermal Technology Vol 2, No 1 (2021): May
Publisher : Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31315/jpgt.v2i1.4143

Abstract

“Jaso field” is located the South Sumatra basin, Indonesia. The lithology of this field is dominated by limestone / carbonate reservoirs with varying permeability (low / tight to high / porous). Acid Fracturing stimulation has been applied to develop this field, because in ideal conditions (with the solubility test between acid and formation > 80%) wormholes will be made in the formation to increase reservoir conductivity and productivity. However, in the Jaso oil field, in some special cases, acid injection did not provide satisfactory results for increasing well conductivity and productivity.In this thesis, we conduct research and evaluation of wells in Jaso field. For example: JS-28, JS-11 and JS-40 are oil wells in the Jaso field with low / narrow reservoir permeability and production rates. Stimulation has been carried out in the JS-28 well, but the results are still below the acid expectation even though the intermediate solubility test (solubility test) is more than 88%.Hydraulic Fracturing with the sandfracturing method (injecting sand proppant with high pressure and exceeding the gradient fracture) has been successfully applied to three wells in the Jaso Field by increasing the oil production rate by more than 100 bopd per well. With this case study, we find that the application of hydraulic fracturing (sandfracturing) with thrusters is not limited to sandstone / sandstone reservoirs, but that this method can be successfully applied to increase the conductivity and productivity of carbonate reservoirs (in special cases) taking into account several parameters of integrity. reservoir wells and characteristics.
Integrated Drilling Optimization A Success Story in the Basin of North Africa Aly Rasyid
Journal of Petroleum and Geothermal Technology Vol 2, No 1 (2021): May
Publisher : Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31315/jpgt.v2i1.4470

Abstract

Drilling optimization objective was to reduce costs, improve wellbore conditions and integrity for increasingly challenging reservoirs while establishing maximum safety performance and environmental custodianship. Even though the final result of a drilling operation is easily observed, what almost always goes unnoticed is the complexity of the issues involved in the planning and execution of a drilling operation and the number of topics involved in such a process.In this paper, as case study of the exploration drilling in Hamada region, North Africa has been evaluated. Over the period of 2006 to 2011, continued drilling improvement was achieved. Key elements in the optimization included focus on management drilling team structure, engineering well planning, improvements on managing drilling operations such as on site safety management practices, and also post drill analysis to implement lesson learn for the next well to be drilled.As the result, while drilling 26 wells during the 2006 until 2011, drilling days were successfully reduced from 87 days (first well) to the average 40 days, and very good safety record performance.
Optimization of Cyclic Steam Stimulation Process Using Response Surface Methodology Suranto A.M.; Eko Widi Pramudiohadi; Anisa Novia Risky
Journal of Petroleum and Geothermal Technology Vol 2, No 1 (2021): May
Publisher : Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31315/jpgt.v2i1.4684

Abstract

Heavy oil has characteristics such as API gravity 10-20 and high viscosity (100-10,000 cp) at reservoir temperature. Several methods have been successfully applied to produce these reserves, such as cyclic steam stimulation (CSS). Cyclic steam stimulation is a thermal injection method that aims to heat the oil around production wells. This paper presents the investigation regarding CSS application in heavy oil using Response Surface Methodology. Several scenarios were done by varying the operating conditions to obtain the most realistic results and also evaluating the factors that most influence the success of CSS process. Optimization is performed to find the maximum recovery factor (RF) value and minimum steam oil cumulative ratio (CSOR). The operating parameters used are CSS cycle, steam injection rate, and steam quality. Then statistical modeling is carried out to test the most important parameters affecting RF and CSOR for 10 years. The simulation results show that the CSS cycle, steam injection rate, and steam quality affect the RF and CSOR. The maximum RF results with the minimum CSOR were obtained at 39 cycles, an injection rate of 300 bbl/day, and a steam quality of 0.9 with an RF and CSOR value is 24.102% and 3.5129 respectively.
Comparison of Different Gases Injection Techniques for Better Oil Productivity Mohammed Samba; Yiqiang Li; Madi Abdullah Naser; Mahmoud O Elsharafi
Journal of Petroleum and Geothermal Technology Vol 2, No 1 (2021): May
Publisher : Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31315/jpgt.v2i1.4009

Abstract

There are many known enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods and every method has its criteria to use it. Some of those methods are gas injection such as CO2 injection, N2 and hydrocarbon gas injection. Where the CO2 has been the largest contributor to global EOR. Gas injection can be classified into two main types; continues gas injection (CGI) and water alternating gas injection (WAG). The objective of this research is to propose initial gases injection plan of the X field to maximize the total oil recovery. The feasibility study of different gases to maintain pressure and optimize oil recovery have been examined on a simple mechanistic reservoir model of considerably depleted saturated oil reservoir. In order to maximize the total oil recovery, the simulation study was conducted on 3-phase compositional simulation model. For more optimization, a sensitivity study was conducted on the injection cycling and component ratios. A sensitivity study was also conducted on the following parameters to study their effects on the overall field’s recovery such as flow rate and bottom-hole pressure. Results obtained in this paper shows that, the WAG CO2 injection was found to be significantly more efficient than different gas injection and continues gas injection. The oil recovery depends not only on the fluid-to-fluid displacement but also on the compositional phase behavior. 
Evaluation and Optimization of Bypassed Oil in Carbonate Reservoir at Mature Field with Integration of Saturation Log and Cement Bond Quality Agus Amperianto; Dyah Rini Ratnaningsih; Dedy Kristanto
Journal of Petroleum and Geothermal Technology Vol 2, No 1 (2021): May
Publisher : Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31315/jpgt.v2i1.4140

Abstract

AA field is a unitized asset operated by Corporate Oil Company since May 2018. The main producing formation of AA field is a reef build-up carbonate reservoir. The field has been on production since 2004 with OOIP of 297 MMSTB. As of November 2019 the cumulative production was estimated 120.7 MMSTB with RF of 41%. The carbonate reservoir has properties with relatively high heterogeneity –both vertically as well as laterally – which leads to production variation of the wells. The production performance shows an estimated 30% decline and significantly increasing water-cut. The production data shows a much faster water production compared with the cumulative production, which is also the greatest challenge in the AA field.There are several key contributing factors for the water production in AA field:Water channeling behind casing due to poor cement bond. This is supported by Chan Plot analysis.Uneven production of the wells leading to varying water rise and introduces difficulty in water contact determination.Water coning due to production exceeding the critical rate.Several efforts have been performed to optimize production, namely: identification of the potential of remaining hydrocarbon (bypassed oil) in the wells by evaluating current saturation evaluation through downhole surveillance, estimation of current water contact and cement bond improvement.The preparation steps of the production optimization process are summarized below:Screening of Candidate WellsEvaluation of Cement Bond QualityWellsite Execution for Bypassed Oil EvaluationWell PreparationOptimum C/O Log to Evaluate Current Saturation and to Identify Bypassed Oil ZonesBypassed Oil Interval ProductionThis section discusses one of successful cases in the production optimization effort implemented in the AA- field.AA-12 wellThe last production of AA-12 well was 84 BOPD. Chan plot showed possibility of water channeling, which was supported by CBL result. The zone of existing perforation interval was indicated to have “free pipe” behind the casing. Remedial cementing was then performed until sufficient zonal isolation was obtained. After subsequent CBL confirmed good zonal isolation, C/O log was then performed. The C/O log result indicated several reservoir zones with potential bypassed oil. The new production interval was selected based on following consideration: So between 55-60%, height above current OWC of 185 ft (56 m), distance to the adjacent wells of 1306 ft (398 m), porosity 12-17% and Production test of the new perforation resulted in 2186 BOPD with 0% water-cut.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): May Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): November Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): May Vol 5, No 1 (2024): May Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): November Vol 4, No 2 (2023): November Vol 4, No 1 (2023): May Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): May Vol 3, No 2 (2022): November Vol 3, No 1 (2022): May Vol 2, No 2 (2021): November Vol 2, No 1 (2021): May Vol 1, No 2 (2020): November Vol 1, No 1 (2020): May More Issue