Corruptio
The Journal Corruptio is an international journal of anti-corruption published by the Law Faculty of Universitas Lampung as a platform for academicians, researchers, and practitioners to publish their authentic articles or reviews regarding communication and development of the criminal law, legal comparison, and interdisciplinary related to corruption. The scope of the Journal Corruptio is the result of research or conceptual studies on the criminal law consisting of law in general, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and corruption. The Journal Corruptio publishes two issues in a year, on January and July that provides open accessed journal in attempts for all published content in the journal is available for free without charged fees toward users and their institutions. The Journal Corruptio opens access directly to the completed substance based on the principle of free research availability to support significant global knowledge exchange. The Corruptio Journal is a platform for academicians, researchers, and practitioners to publish their authentic articles or reviews regarding communication and development of the criminal law, legal comparison, and interdisciplinary related to corruption. The scope of the Journal Corruptio is the result of research or conceptual studies on the criminal law consisting of law in general, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and corruption. Scope and Focus of the journal consist as follows: a. Law enforcement Law enforcement is an effort to enforce the function of law and norms in the society. Generally, law enforcement aims to act as a behavioral guidance of the society’s behaviour. In the Journal Corruptio, law enforcement discusses topics on concept of law enforcement and rehabilitation. These discussions on law enforcement are applied on corruption cases, behavioral, and philosophy in Indonesia. b. Prevention Law consist of 2 (two) natures which are prevention and repression. The scope of Journal Corruptio, leans to law’s function of preventing. Prevention means the law acts as preclusion against crimes, specifically crimes of corruption. Prevention in the Journal Corruption is executed through dissemination, socialization, and other platforms to insert values that could hinder corrupt behaviors for example, corruption, collusion, nepotism, money laundering. c. Protection Law protection defines an aegis towards the human rights of the society in order to enjoy their rights to its fullest. In the Jounal Corruptio, protection highlights protection towards witnesses in order to provide them security and convenience during their trial process of giving facts and evidential statements.
Articles
6 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 3 No 2 (2022)"
:
6 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Confiscation Of Assets For The Crime Corruption Used As Guarantee Mortgage ]]>
<![CDATA[Tri Yatmoko]]>
<![CDATA[ Corruptio Vol 3 No 2 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v3i2.2728
<![CDATA[Asset confiscation is one of the government's efforts to compensate for state losses. The Prosecutor's Office is one institution with the authority to carry out asset confiscation based on court decisions. In carrying out judicial decisions on corruption crimes, the Prosecutor's Office experiences various obstacles in practicing the value of justice, one of which is the seizure of assets attached to mortgages. The assessment of confiscating assets burdened with mortgages uses empirical juridical methods through library research and field research. The problem of this research focused on the practice of confiscating assets resulting from corruption in recovering state finances and how is the mechanism for confiscating assets resulting from corruption with mortgages attached. The study results show that in practice, the seizure of assets resulting from corrupt criminal acts takes a very long time because the time required for a case to obtain a binding court decision can take months, maybe even years. Next, the mechanism for confiscation of assets by prosecutors can confiscate assets resulting from corruption crimes that are pledged in the bank with mortgage rights attached, as long as the court can prove that the assets are indeed the result of corruption crimes and have permanent legal force (Eintracht). Because the criminal law position (public) is higher than civil law (private).]]>
<![CDATA[Application Of Restorative Justice In The Settlement Of Corruption Crimes ]]>
<![CDATA[Ilham Nur Pratama]]>;
<![CDATA[Nurul Restu Azyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Corruptio Vol 3 No 2 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v3i2.2732
<![CDATA[Corruption is a problem that is detrimental to state finances. The magnitude of the handling of corruption cases and the handling of the investigation process to execution will not be comparable if the corruption has a slight state loss. Unlike the punishing justice method with the current developments, it makes legal decisions on state losses with the restorative justice method against minor corruption crimes. Using the juridical-normative method, the authors look for available data on the mechanism and its implementation and the implementation of restorative justice by the High Court in the Lampung Province Regions. This research's problem discussed criminalizing corruption from the perspective of restorative justice and how an advocate can apply the concept of restorative justice to corruption in Lampung area. The results show that Restorative justice is an alternative for resolving corruption cases because it provides a comprehensive and effective solution for retributive justice needs to fulfill the goal, namely the non-optimal return of state financial losses. The concept of state restorative justice as a public representative is realized only to punish the perpetrators (retributive justice).]]>
<![CDATA[Implementation Of The Death Criminal Sanction In The Corruption Criminal Action Law ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Tetuko Nadigo Putra]]>
<![CDATA[ Corruptio Vol 3 No 2 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v3i2.2735
<![CDATA[Criminal act of corruption which is governed under, subsequent called UUTPK is not yet set assertive regarding the amount and related conditions with inner country state as specific stated under Article 2 Paragraph (2) UUTPK which states: that in case act criminal corruption like as referred to in paragraph (1) is carried out in situation-specific, then criminal dead could implement. The method study used in this paper are juridical normative and empirical. Approach the study was conducted at the Tanjung Karang District Court, Bandar Lampung District Attorney, Peradi Lampung DPC, and Lampung University. Type of data used is secondary data and primary data. The results of research and discussion show that death criminal sanction not applied in acts of criminal corruption as set is in UUTPK. Regulation Number 20 of 2001 contained in Article 2 paragraph (2) is inefficient because in its implementation the judge often decides to use Article 2 paragraph (1) UUTPK in case of criminal corruption because provision chapter clearly explains the terms and the conditions of the quert article. This provision chapter could be applied, and P 2 paragraph (2) the original has much weakness because Article 2 paragraph (2) do not explain the apparent size and terms subjugated on somebody for convicted death sanction according to the author. If Article being (2) paragraph 2 wants to be applied, it must be clarified in the chapter/provision. For example, if corruption or loss of state money is above Rp. 1 billion, the convict must be punished dead. The reason as to why death criminal sunction is not applied effectively wittin corruption criminal act , has also something to do with the willingness of Indonesian judges to conviet perpetraturs with maximum punishment, of course in the and such legal decision must also be seen from varius aspects]]>
<![CDATA[Prison Penalty In Providing A Determination Effect For Criminal Actions Of Corruption ]]>
<![CDATA[Fristia Berdian Tamza]]>
<![CDATA[ Corruptio Vol 3 No 2 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v3i2.2736
<![CDATA[The case of corruption as a phenomenon of deviation from social, cultural and state life has many scientists and philosophers study and criticize it. One of the world's famous philosophers is Aristotle, who formulated what he calls moral corruption. Moral corruption refers to various forms of the constitution that have deviated so that the regime's rulers are included in the democratic system where by they are no longer led by law, but also on the other hand no longer serv themselves. The problem in this research is the Effectiveness of Imprisonment for Criminal Acts of Corruption, and Does Imprisonment Can Have a Deterrent Effect on Perpetrators of Criminal Acts of Corruption? This paper is a normative legal research. This normative legal research method is used because the approach in this paper is carried out by using a case approach and a statute approach. The prison sentence is threatened for someone who has committed a crime. Imprisonment: consists of life imprisonment and temporary imprisonment or imprisonment for a specific time. The temporary prison sentence is a minimum of one day and a maximum of fifteen years. However, temporary imprisonment may be imposed for twenty years if the crime committed by a person is punishable by death or life imprisonment or is threatened with imprisonment of 20 (twenty) years if there is a combination of several criminal acts (same lop) the perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption deserve death penalty, as such being given the death penalty will provide a deterrent effect and also be a lesson for others not to do the same thing (corruption). Almost no judges generally impose the death penalty because it is associated with aggravating or mitigating reasons. The mitigating factor is far more dominant regarding the highest sentence limit, education, and others.]]>
<![CDATA[Corruption Potential Of Environmental Funds In Overcoming Climate Change In Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Daryanti Daryanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Raineven Sailano Violand Charnade]]>
<![CDATA[ Corruptio Vol 3 No 2 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v3i2.2737
<![CDATA[Indonesia's solemnity in dealing with climate change is demonstrated by ratifying the Paris Agreement 2015 treaty into Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2016 concerning the ratification of the Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which contains efforts to address climate change with the REDD+ program. The Government of Indonesia receives funding from REDD+, which addresses climate change in Indonesia. However, this creates the potential for corruption in using REDD+ funds by state officials. This study aims to understand the potential for corruption of environmental funds by government officials in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and anticipating climate change in Indonesia. This paper uses research method consisting of a qualitative research methodology with literature review research. The data analysis uses an objective case approach and a normative juridical approach. Based on several cases of misuse of environmental funds in Indonesia, it is not certain that the optimization to address climate change at the Ministry of Environment will work as it should to achieve the target as promised in Indonesia's NDC for 2030.]]>
<![CDATA[Formulation Of The Application Of Restorative Justice To Offenders Of Corruption In Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Rahjay Pelengkahu]]>;
<![CDATA[Indirwan Indirwan]]>
<![CDATA[ Corruptio Vol 3 No 2 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/corruptio.v3i2.2756
<![CDATA[Today's paradigm for resolving corruption issues should move from retributive to restorative justice. The existing criminal justice system, which stresses retributive justice, is incapable of achieving the goals intended by the law's drafters, namely the suboptimal restitution of public financial losses. In light of the failure of retributive justice to prevent and remove corruption, it is vital to adopt a new strategy called restorative justice. In addition to preventing and eradicating corruption offenses, the restorative justice strategy may be utilized to maximize the recovery of losses to the state. This is a normative study with numerous primary, secondary, and tertiary legal resources serving as data sources. The evidence is then descriptively and qualitatively examined, resulting in a conclusion addressing the legal issues. The failure of retributive justice procedures based on vengeance and neoclassical theory to satisfy society's sense of justice sparked the idea of incorporating restorative justice into the concept of punishment, particularly the punishment of those who commit corruption offenses. To use restorative justice approaches to resolving corruption cases, it is essential to establish systematized and exhaustive legal processes to eradicate corruption. The state still needs to create legal processes for resolving corruption cases utilizing restorative justice approaches. In this work, the author attempts to develop a legal system for resolving corruption cases with restorative justice approaches that consider crucial variables and the repercussions of implementing this procedure.]]>
