cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Eti Hayati
Contact Email
dosen01391@unpam.ac.id
Phone
+6285214312040
Journal Mail Official
dosen01391@unpam.ac.id
Editorial Address
https://ressat.org/index.php/ressat/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
Research in Social Sciences and Technology
Published by Universitas Pamulang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 24686891     DOI : 10.46303/ressat.05.02.7
Core Subject : Education,
Education
Office address of Editor-in-Chief: Yesilova Mah. Caldiran Cad. 29/11 Etimesgut-Ankara-Turkey-- E-ISSN registered office located at Den Haag Netherlands, 2496 NL,Netherlands
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2 No 1 (2017): Research in Social Sciences and Technology" : 3 Documents clear
An Exploratory Study: Mobile Device Use For Academics Malia Hoffmann
Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 2 No 1 (2017): Research in Social Sciences and Technology
Publisher : Research in Social Sciences and Technology- OpenED Network

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46303/ressat.02.01.2

Abstract

This exploratory study surveyed how undergraduate students and higher education instructors at two small faith-based universities in Southern California used mobile devices in and outside of the class for academic purposes. The researcher cross-referenced the results from the two groups to make correlations. The results of this study showed that nearly all instructor participants had multiple devices and almost half of the student participants had two or more devices as well. Those devices are being used in and outside of formal class for academics in very basic and emerging way that are just touching the surface of their capabilities. This study found that students use their devices in class to read, reference, or search materials. Faculty reported using their devices as presentation devices most often.
Value Priorities of Public and Private University Students Mehmet Fatih Yigit
Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 2 No 1 (2017): Research in Social Sciences and Technology
Publisher : Research in Social Sciences and Technology- OpenED Network

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46303/ressat.02.01.1

Abstract

In this study, the aim of the study is to find out whether there is a statistically significant difference between value priorities of public and private universities in Turkey. This is a quantitative study using ANOVA for the analysis of the data. The results suggest that private university students show greater tendency towards universalism, power, tradition, conformity, and hedonism compared to the public university students, while the public university students showed greater sensitivity to benevolence compared to the private university students. The test results also showed that the education level of mothers do not have a significant effect on value priorities of both public and private university students, while father's education has significant effect on the perception of power.
A Comparison of The Mathematical Processes Embedded in The Content Standards of Turkey and Singapore Evrim Erbilgin
Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 2 No 1 (2017): Research in Social Sciences and Technology
Publisher : Research in Social Sciences and Technology- OpenED Network

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46303/ressat.02.01.3

Abstract

This study compares Turkey's and Singapore's mathematics content standards in terms of the highligthed mathematical processes. A mathematical processes framework was employed to analyze the content standards drawing on the standards for mathematical practice defined by the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. The standards for mathematical practice include make sense of problems and persevere in solving them, reason abstractly and quantitatively, construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others, model with mathematics, use appropriate tools strategically, attend to precision, look for and make use of structure, look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. The data sources are 2013 mathematics curriculum standards of Turkey and 2013 mathematics syllabus of Singapore for grades 7 and 8. Data analysis revealed that the two countries reflected mathematical processes differently in their content standards. Some mathematical processes are not identified in Turkey's content standards while all mathematical processes are observed in Singapore's content standards. The distribution of the observed mathematical processes are also different in the two countries. Suggestions for future content standards revisions are shared in the paper.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 3

 1 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 10 No 3 (2025): Research in Social Sciences and Technology (Vol.10 issue 3, In Progress) Vol 10 No 2 (2025): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 9 No 3 (2024): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 9 No 2 (2024): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 9 No 1 (2024): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 8 No 1 (2023): Research in Social Sciences and Technology (Vol.8 issue 1, In Progress) Vol 8 No 4 (2023): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 8 No 3 (2023): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Research in Social Sciences and Technology (Special Issue) Vol 7 No 3 (2022): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 7 No 2 (2022): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 7 No 1 (2022): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 6 No 3 (2021): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 6 No 2 (2021): Research in Social Sciences and Technology (Special Issue) Vol 6 No 1 (2021): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 5 No 3 (2020): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 5 No 2 (2020): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Research in Social Sciences and Technology (Special Issue) Vol 4 No 2 (2019): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 4 No 1 (2019): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 3 No 3 (2018): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 3 No 2 (2018): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 3 No 1 (2018): Research in Social Sciences and Technology (Special Issue) Vol 2 No 2 (2017): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 2 No 1 (2017): Research in Social Sciences and Technology Vol 1 No 2 (2016): Research in Social Science and Technology Vol 1 No 1 (2016): Research in Social Science and Technology More Issue