cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto
Contact Email
dodiksetiawan@uii.ac.id
Phone
+6287738216661
Journal Mail Official
plr.editor@uii.ac.id
Editorial Address
Doctorate Program Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Indonesia Jalan Cik Dik Tiro No. 1, Yogyakarta
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Prophetic Law Review
Published by Universitas Islam Indonesia
ISSN : 26862379     EISSN : 26863464     DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.20885
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Prophetic Law Review is a law journal published by the Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Indonesia. The primary purpose of this journal is to disseminate research, conceptual analysis, and other writings of scientific nature on legal issues by integrating moral and ethical values. Articles published cover various topics on Islamic law, International law, Constitutional law, Private law, Criminal law, Administrative law, Procedural law, Comparative law, and other law-related issues either in Indonesia or other countries all over the world. This journal is designed to be an international law journal and intended as a forum for a legal scholarship which discusses ideas and insights from law professors, legal scholars, judges, and practitioners.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 1 December 2019" : 6 Documents clear
The Effectiveness Of Administrative Review In Indonesia’S Administrative Court System Dani, Umar
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 December 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol1.iss1.art4

Abstract

This research aims to describe the use of administrative review in Indonesia. There are two rules of administrative review: administrative review according to Act Number 5 Year 1986 on State Administrative Judicial Action, and administrative review according to Act Number 30 Year 2014 on Government Administration. Both of these rules contradict each other and are equally authorized at the same time, and thus, in practice, we must determine which regulation is the most appropriate to use as a legal basis. This study analyzes the use of administrative review and its effectiveness in providing legal protection. To discuss these issues, the researcher has used normative or dogmatic legal research method. The results of the study show that in general, administrative review procedure has applied the system as determined in Act Number 30 Year 2014 on Government Administration, except those specifically regulated by Act No 5, such as personnel disputes. The new version of Administrative review does not provide effective legal protection because the process of resolving state administrative disputes is lengthy and does not comply with the principles and theories of administrative review in general terms.Keywords: Administrative law; administrative review; objection; State Administrative Court.Efektivitas Pengujian Administratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara IndonesiaAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan penggunaan administrative review (pengujian administratif) di Indonesia. Ada dua aturan terkait pengujian administratif, yaitu: pengujian administratif menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara; dan pengujian administratif menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Tata Usaha Negara. Kedua aturan ini sama-sama berwenang namun saling bertentangan sehingga dalam praktiknya kita harus menentukan aturan mana yang paling tepat untuk dijadikan landasan hukum. Studi ini menganalisis penggunaan pengujian administratif dan efektivitasnya dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum. Untuk membahas permasalahan tersebut, peneliti menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif atau dogmatis. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa secara umum tata cara pengujian administratif telah menerapkan sistem sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Negara, kecuali yang secara khusus diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, seperti sengketa kepegawaian. Bentuk baru pengujian administratif tidak memberikan perlindungan hukum yang efektif karena proses penyelesaian sengketa tata usaha negara yang panjang dan tidak sesuai dengan prinsip dan teori kajian administrasi secara umum.Kata kunci: Hukum Administrasi; Keberatan; Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara; Pengujian Administrasi
Expanding Access To Justice Through E-Court In Indonesia Santiadi, Kukuh
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 December 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol1.iss1.art5

Abstract

Indonesia's Supreme Court (MA) has started a new initiative by applying modern technology to the justice system through e-court. This new measure is a sign that the court responds the development in information technology while improving the quality of legal administration which has long been considered complicated by those seeking justice. This article raises a problem related to the implementation of the e-court system. This article uses a normative approach by obtaining data from various reports and books to be analyzed further and presented descriptively. It tries to explore whether the implementation of e-court has an impact on the efficiency of the administration of legal proceedings as well as an increase in transparency in the process of seeking justice and encouraging professional, transparent, accountable, effective and efficient justice administrationKeywords: Access to justice; e-court; modern courtMemperluas Akses Keadilan Melalui E-Court Di IndonesiaAbstrakMahkamah Agung (MA) Indonesia telah memulai inisiatif baru dengan menerapkan teknologi modern pada sistem peradilan melalui e-court. Langkah baru ini merupakan tanda bahwa pengadilan merespon perkembangan teknologi dan informasi sekaligus meningkatkan kualitas administrasi hukum yang selama ini dianggap rumit oleh pencari keadilan. Tulisan ini mengangkat permasalahan terkait penerapan sistem e-court. Tulisan ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif dengan memperoleh data dari berbagai laporan dan buku untuk dianalisis lebih lanjut dan disajikan secara deskriptif. Penelitian ini mencoba menelusuri apakah penerapan e-court berdampak pada efisiensi penyelenggaraan proses hukum serta peningkatan transparansi dalam proses mencari keadilan dan mendorong penyelenggaraan peradilan yang profesional, transparan, akuntabel, efektif dan efisien.Kata kunci: Akses ke Pengadilan; E-Court; Pengadilan Moderen
Legal Review Of Indefinite Revocation Of The Political Right To Hold Public Office Against Corruption Convicts Mubayyinah, Fira
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 December 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol1.iss1.art6

Abstract

To break the vicious cycle of corruption in the society and maintain social order, revocation of political rights for public officials’ candidacies is considered an appropriate punishment for corruption convicts. This is a form of corruption eradication that prioritizes the achievement of legal goals. Between 2013-2017, 26.9% of corruption convicts had their political rights revoked. This study aims to determine the accuracy of the verdicts for their legal objectives. The study used a normative method with the approach of statutory norms and examples of cases of corruption, described and analyzed critically. The study shows that such verdicts are in accordance with the objectives of the law, because acts of corruption harmed the mandate and public trust.Keywords: Corruption convicts; legal objectives; revocation of political rights.Tinjauan Hukum Pencabutan Tanpa Batas Waktu Hak Politik Untuk Memegang Jabatan Publik Terhadap Narapidana KorupsiAbstrakUntuk memutus lingkaran setan korupsi di masyarakat dan menjaga ketertiban sosial, pencabutan hak politik atan pencalonan diri menjadi pejabat publik dianggap sebagai hukuman yang pantas bagi terpidana korupsi. Hal ini merupakan bentuk pemberantasan korupsi yang mengutamakan pencapaian tujuan hukum. Antara tahun 2013-2017, sebanyak 26.9% terpidana korupsi dicabut hak politiknya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui ketepatan putusan tersebut terhadap tujuan hukumnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus korupsi, dideskripsikan dan dianalisis secara kritis. Kajian menunjukkan bahwa putusan tersebut sesuai dengan tujuan hukum, karena tindak pidana korupsi mencederai amanah dan kepercayaan masyarakatKata kunci: terpidana korupsi; tujuan hukum; pencabutan hak politik.
The Pernicious Consequences Of Political Corruption In Indonesia Handayani, Febri
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 December 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol1.iss1.art1

Abstract

Political corruption is an ethical and juridical deviation committed by people with positions of political power. Political corruption has a more structured system than general corruption cases, because political corruption is committed to satisfy the interests of political parties. Political corruption cases are commonplace in a country where political corruption is rampant. This is a normative legal research, using a case approach, conceptual approach, and statutory approach, as well as qualitative analysis. Based on this analysis, it is conclusive that political corruption is an action carried out by political elites or state government officials that has an impact on the country's political and economic situation. People and or parties who have political positions usually commit these acts. Political corruption can be in the form of abuse of authority, granting influence, lobbying, self-enrichment, vote-buying, and election fraud. In terms of effectiveness of the law, the pervasive political corruption in Indonesia is attributed to ineffective law enforcement related to political corruption. In fact, some former corruption convicts may become a corruption recidivist simply because the law enforcement of political corruption fails to have any deterrent effect due to the disharmony between laws and regulations related to political corruption. The rampant political corruption practices result in violations against the principles of good governance.Keywords: Legal consequences, political corruptionKonsekuensi Buruk Korupsi Politik di IndonesiaAbstrakKorupsi politik adalah penyimpangan etika dan juga penyimpangan yuridis yang dilakukan oleh orang-orang yang memiliki posisi dan kekuasaan politik. Korupsi politik memiliki sistem yang lebih terstruktur dibandingkan kasus korupsi umum karena korupsi politik ini dilakukan demi memenuhi kepentingan partai politik. Kasus korupsi politik merupakan hal yang lumrah ditemukan di negara yang korupsi politiknya merajalela. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan kasus, konseptual, dan perundang-undangan, serta analisis kualitatif. Berdasarkan analisis tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa korupsi politik adalah tindakan yang dilakukan oleh elit politik atau pejabat pemerintah yang berdampak pada situasi politik dan ekonomi negara. Biasanya orang dan/atau partai yang memiliki jabatan politik yang melakukan perbuatan tersebut. Korupsi politik dapat berupa penyalahgunaan wewenang, pemberian pengaruh, lobi, pengayaan diri, pembelian suara, hingga kecurangan pemilu. Dari sisi efektifitas hukum, maraknya korupsi politik di Indonesia disebabkan oleh tidak efektifnya penegakan hukum terkait korupsi politik. Bahkan, beberapa mantan narapidana korupsi bisa menjadi residivis korupsi hanya karena penegakan hukum korupsi politik tidak memberikan efek jera akibat disharmonisasi antara peraturan perundang-undangan terkait korupsi politik. Maraknya praktik korupsi politik mengakibatkan pelanggaran terhadap prinsip-prinsip tata pemerintahan yang baikKata kunci: Konsekuensi Hukum; Korupsi Politik
Review Of Indonesian Constitutional Court Decision Number 21-22/PUU-V/2007 Based On The Inclusive Legal Theory Darwis, Muhammad
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 December 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol1.iss1.art2

Abstract

This Sovereignty and liberalization are often considered opposites. This resistance is caused by differences in the interests of the two instruments. The object of this research is the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21-22/PUU-V/2007 about judicial review of the UUPM. This study aims to review the Constitutional Court Decision based on The Inclusive Legal Theory. It addresses the research question: What is relevance of The Inclusive Legal Theory in analysing the Constitutional Court's Decision? This study uses normative legal research, which examines the Constitutional Court Decision and the UUPM. The results show that the Constitutional Court sought, in its decision, to bridge the gap between liberalization and sovereignty by returning to the interpretation of the 1945 constitution. The mechanism of legal proceedings in the Constitutional Court is still relevant to elements of the Inclusive legal theoryKeywords: Constitutional Court, Investment, The Inclusive Legal Theory.Tinjauan Yuridis atas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 21-22/PUU-V/2007 Berdasarkan Teori Hukum InklusifAbstrakKedaulatan dan liberalisasi sering dianggap berlawanan. Resistensi ini disebabkan oleh perbedaan kepentingan kedua instrumen tersebut. Objek penelitian ini adalah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21-22/PUU-V/2007 tentang pengujian UUPM. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi berdasarkan Teori Hukum Inklusif. Permasalahan yang diajukan dalam penelitian ini adalah: Apakah relevansi Teori Hukum Inklusif dalam menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi? Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang mengkaji Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan UUPM. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam putusannya berupaya menjembatani kesenjangan antara liberalisasi dan kedaulatan dengan kembali pada penafsiran UUD 1945. Mekanisme proses hukum di MK masih relevan dengan unsur teori hukum inklusif.Kata kunci: Investasi; Mahkamah Konstitusi; Teori Hukum Inklusif.
Reconceptualizing Consumer Contracts In The Philosophical Perspective Of Pancasila Gumanti, Retna
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 December 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol1.iss1.art3

Abstract

This study aims to develop the concept of consumer contracts from the philosophical perspective of Pancasila in Indonesia to achieve the legal objectives of legal certainty, justice, and legal benefits. The research is formulated to question how to conceptualize consumer contracts from the philosophical perspective of Pancasila. By using doctrinal research, this study concludes that consumer contracts in Indonesia do not meet the values of Pancasila. Therefore, the article attempts to conceptualize the consumer contract by offering communal principles to realize mutual benefits between the parties in a consumer contract without ignoring the special characteristics of the nation that existed before the independence of the Republic of IndonesiaKeywords: Consumer Contracts, Pancasila Philosophy.Rekonseptualisasi Kontrak Konsumen dalam Perspektif Filosofis PancasilaAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan konsep kontrak konsumen dari perspektif filosofis ideologi Pancasila di Indonesia untuk mencapai tujuan yaitu kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan hukum. Penelitian ini dirumuskan untuk mempertanyakan bagaimana mengkonseptualisasikan kontrak konsumen dari perspektif filosofis Pancasila. Dengan menggunakan penelitian doktrinal, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kontrak konsumen di Indonesia tidak memenuhi nilai-nilai Pancasila. Oleh karena itu, pasal tersebut berusaha mengkonseptualisasikan kontrak konsumen dengan menawarkan prinsip komunal untuk mewujudkan saling menguntungkan antara para pihak dalam kontrak konsumen tanpa mengabaikan ciri khas bangsa yang ada sebelum kemerdekaan Republik IndonesiaKata kunci: Filosofis Pancasila; Kontrak Konsumen

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 1 June 2025 Vol. 6 No. 2 December 2024 Vol. 6 No. 1 June 2024 Vol. 5 No. 2 December 2023 Vol. 5 No. 1 June 2023 Vol. 4 No. 2 December 2022 Vol. 4 No. 1 June 2022 Vol. 3 No. 2 December 2021 Vol. 3 No. 1 June 2021 Vol. 2 No. 2 December 2020 Vol. 2 No. 1 June 2020 Vol. 1 No. 1 December 2019 More Issue