cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Hamzah, S.H,. M.H
Contact Email
iplr@fh.unila.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
iplr@fh.unila.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung B, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lampung, Jln. Prof. Soemantri Brojonegoro No.1 Gedong Meneng Bandar Lampung, Indonesia 35145
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Indonesia Private Law Review
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 2723259X     EISSN : 27459284     DOI : 10.25041/iplr
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
FOCUS The Indonesian Private Law Review discusses matters in the private law field, consisting of established or founded upon law actions. Subsequently, the Indonesian Private Law Review focuses on implementation to put a decision or plan into effect or execution. In the Indonesian Private Law Review, law development must integrate and synergize with other sectors of development. SCOPE The Indonesian Private Law Review scope discusses matters regarding the legal grounds, implementation, and law and development of the private law field. The journal encourages contributions on fields that have correlation or interests to the following discussions: Agreement International trade Islamic law Family law Adat law Business and economy law Intellectual Property Rights Civil Code of Indonesia or burgerlijk wetboek Commercial Code of Indonesia or Wetboek van Koopenhandel voor Indonesia.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023)" : 6 Documents clear
PROVIDER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR DATA PERSONAL CONSUMER ASSOCIATED WITH PRIME CARD REGISTRATION Anugrah Prima Utama
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2794

Abstract

To minimize starter packs, the Government, through Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information Number 12 of 2016 jo. Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Informatics Number 14 of 2017 concerning the Registration of Telecommunications Service Customers requires consumers to send personal data to the operator as a National Identity Number and Family Card Number or biological mother's name. However, this condition needs to be addressed appropriately, bearing in mind that the use of personal data by irresponsible parties without approval or authorization or because electronic system failures are prone to occur. The problems in this research are further examining the legal relationship between the provider and the consumer, the provider's responsibility to the consumer's data regarding starter pack registration, and the legal remedies consumers can take when personal data protection fails. The method used in this research is normative, carried out by reviewing existing laws and regulations and the literature related to the research topic. This study's results indicate a legal relationship between providers and consumers marked by registration recruitment. The provider, in this case, is the party that formulates the agreement, while the consumer only agrees and follows the agreed terms. Furthermore, the operator has responsibility for the telecommunications services it provides, including maintaining legitimacy, truth, accuracy, and relevance, as well as suitability to obtain, collect, analyzing, process, display, store, post, send, disseminate, to destroying personal data by the provisions legislation. And suppose there is a failure to protect the confidentiality of personal data. In that case, consumers can file legal remedies through complaints, civil lawsuits through court and alternative dispute resolution, or prosecution of providers.
IMPLICATIONS OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE IMPLEMENTATION BUSINESS CONTRACTS Mutia Kartika Putri
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2920

Abstract

The spread of Covid-19 has caused many debtors to be unable to carry out their achievements in contracts. The problems in this research are related to force majeure according to civil law in Indonesia, whether what is included in the qualifications for the Covid-19 pandemic can be categorized as force majeure according to Indonesian civil law and the legal consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic related to the implementation of business contracts. This type of research is normative legal research and descriptive research. The results of the study show that the characteristics of force majeure in civil law in Indonesia are not regulated in the Civil Code. Force majeure refers to events that cannot be predicted by humans or are related to natural events. The proof is that the cause of force majeure may not necessarily be categorized as force majeure. Several force majeure characteristics must be met as a reason for force majeure due to the Covid-19 pandemic by the debtor. This shows that the use of force majeure reasons still has a heavy burden and responsibility on the part of the debtor, there are restrictions on the application of force majeure. There are also incidents in the form of the Covid-19 pandemic or government policies that arose as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. It needs to be reviewed based on the nature of force majeure and the need for propriety or good faith of the debtor even though an event hinders the fulfillment of achievements.
LEGALITY EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS IMPLEMENTATION BY SHAREHOLDERS Andhes Tan Satrisna
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2930

Abstract

The General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) is the organ of the company that has the highest authority in the company, and all decisions relating to the company are stipulated through the GMS after certain conditions have been met as stipulated in the laws and regulations. The purpose of this research is to find out the implementation of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS) and the legal consequences of the Implementation of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders organized by PT. KOLINGKAS in terms of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. This study uses normative legal research methods and uses a qualitative approach. As well as using primary, secondary and tertiary sources of legal materials from books, journals, laws and regulations related to the holding of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders. The results of the study show that the legality of holding an EGMS by shareholders can be seen from the legal consequences of holding an Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders (EGMS) held by PT. KOLINGKAS, in holding the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders, the Plaintiff as a Member of the Board of Directors was not given any defense by the Defendants, in this case PT. KLK and also the plan to dismiss the Plaintiff as Director were not notified in advance to the Plaintiff, the implementation was carried out unilaterally, or the directors did not know about it, so that the Plaintiff was dismissed by the EGMS as stated in Deed Number 06 concerning Minutes of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of PT. KLK does not meet the requirements and procedures set out in UUPT and is an unlawful act, then it has violated laws and regulations or it is considered that the decision is legally flawed. So that for fraudulent acts committed by parties within the company, the party conducting the Extraordinary GMS activities can be held liable for civil liability for these actions.
IMPLEMENTATION NATIONAL AGREEMENTS IN THE DIVISION OF COLLECTIVE PROPERTY IN THE TIME OF DIVORCE Yulius Oktaber
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2945

Abstract

This research was conducted to find out the agreement made by the husband and wife before the marriage takes place which is called the marriage agreement or prenuptial agreement which regulates the separation of assets. The joint assets that are formed in marriage are from the time the marriage takes place until the date the marriage bond is broken. Furthermore, based on Article 38 of Law no. 16 of 2019 stipulates that marriages can be dissolved due to: death; divorce; and by court decision. This study uses the Normative Juridical legal research method, whose approach is carried out by examining statutory regulations that can be used as a legal reference in the application of Prenuptial agreements and analyzing the judge's decision at the Bandar Lampung Religious High Court Number: 0004/Pdt.G/2021/PTA.Bdl dated January 27, 2021 as a guideline for sharing joint assets after divorce. The results of this study are that there is a legal position in the settlement of the distribution of joint assets after divorce and shows that the legal position in the settlement of the distribution of joint assets after marriage has been regulated in marriage law and the compilation of Islamic law. Furthermore, the judge's consideration regarding the distribution of joint assets in the Religious Court Decision No.0004/Pdt.G/2021/PTA.Bdl. regarding the divorce decision.
THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY ON DIGITAL BUSINESS AGREEMENTS: BETWEEN MITIGATION AND ORIENTATION Miftah Arifin; Zaenal Arifin; Mac Thi Hoai Thuong
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2954

Abstract

The Agreement as part of civil law is one of everyday life's most frequently performed actions.  This study aims to anticipate the development of digital agreements by contextualizing the provisions of laws and regulations regarding agreements. This research is normative legal research that uses statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the study confirm that efforts to mitigate digital agreements following contract law are by still referring to Article 1320 of the Civil Code by prioritizing four orientations to minimize risks in digital agreements. First, the preventive orientation by looking at the parties who are invited to enter into agreements. Second, the prudence and proportionality in reading the provisions in digital agreements. Third, the prudence and proportionality of digital agreements by including names as well as identities that can be contacted and can be accounted for by the parties. Fourth, prudence and proportionality in determining the object of the agreement. Furthermore, the orientation of digital agreements based on the principle of proportionality based on philosophical, sociological, and juridical aspects requires specific arrangements, particularly regarding the minimum requirements for implementing digital agreements. That is because the unique characteristics of digital agreements need special arrangements regarding the terms of the validity of digital agreements, which in general still refer to Article 1320 of the Civil Code.
LIMITATIONS OF CLINICAL AUTHORITY AND MEDICAL PRACTICE THROUGH APPLICATION-BASED TELEMEDICINE Chandrika Karisa Adhalia
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v4i1.2962

Abstract

Telemedicine is a technology-based health service that can be carried out remotely by health workers to improve public health. This study aims to determine the status of telemedicine service provider applications in medical practice therapeutic transactions, the status of doctors' practice licenses (SIP) in telemedicine practice, and the limits of clinical authority that doctors can exercise in providing medical services form of Telemedicine. This research method is normative juridical by analyzing library materials, secondary legal materials, and the results of interviews with informants. The study results found that the telemedicine service provider application is not an official health facility, the SIP used as a requirement in telemedicine-based applications does not comply with applicable regulations, and the limited clinical authority for telemedicine practice is consultation and initial therapy.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020) More Issue