cover
Contact Name
Dr. Hamzah, S.H,. M.H
Contact Email
iplr@fh.unila.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
iplr@fh.unila.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung B, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lampung, Jln. Prof. Soemantri Brojonegoro No.1 Gedong Meneng Bandar Lampung, Indonesia 35145
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Indonesia Private Law Review
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 2723259X     EISSN : 27459284     DOI : 10.25041/iplr
Core Subject : Social,
FOCUS The Indonesian Private Law Review discusses matters in the private law field, consisting of established or founded upon law actions. Subsequently, the Indonesian Private Law Review focuses on implementation to put a decision or plan into effect or execution. In the Indonesian Private Law Review, law development must integrate and synergize with other sectors of development. SCOPE The Indonesian Private Law Review scope discusses matters regarding the legal grounds, implementation, and law and development of the private law field. The journal encourages contributions on fields that have correlation or interests to the following discussions: Agreement International trade Islamic law Family law Adat law Business and economy law Intellectual Property Rights Civil Code of Indonesia or burgerlijk wetboek Commercial Code of Indonesia or Wetboek van Koopenhandel voor Indonesia.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 61 Documents
THE SUBJECT ELEMENT IN CONTRACT AND OBLIGATION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYTICAL LEGAL STUDY Tarrad, Abdullah Mukhlif
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Issue In progress (January 2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v6i1.4086

Abstract

This research addresses a key issue concerning the distinction between the contract subject and the obligation subject—whether they are separate concepts, interchangeable, or one replaces the other. The matter is complex, particularly as the Iraqi Civil Code refers to the contract subject inconsistently: sometimes as a core element of the contract, and other times as the obligation subject. This inconsistency has led to confusion, highlighting the need for a clear distinction between the two. The study aims to clarify this ambiguity, underscore the importance of differentiating the terms, and establish a standard to distinguish between them.