cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muh Ridha Hakim
Contact Email
jurnal.peratun@gmail.com
Phone
+6281277876163
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperatun@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Gedung Sekretariat Mahkamah Agung, Puslitbang Lt. 10 Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58, Kel. Cempaka Putih Timur, Kec. Cempaka Putih, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10510
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum Peratun
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 26155222     EISSN : 26155230     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.%v%i%Y.%p
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of articles published in this journal discusses various topics in the field of Administrative Law and other sections related to contemporary problems in administrative law such as: tax law, land law, environmental law, labor law, government law, Regional Government Law, Health Law, Agrarian Law, Public Policy Law, Natural Resources Law and Judicial Review.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 5 No 1 (2022)" : 5 Documents clear
PENGARUH HOMOGENISASI PEMERINTAHAN DESA DI INDONESIA TERKAIT PERUBAHAN SOSIAL Vita Deliana
Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/peratun.512022.1-18

Abstract

Perubahan hukum melalui modifikasi atau perubahan nilai yang ada di masyarakat melalui undang-undang dapat menyebabkan perubahan sosial. Dalam tulisan ini perubahan sosial yang dimaksud adalah seputar desa dan pemerintahan desa di Indonesia, sejak sebelum kemerdekaan sampai era reformasi saat ini. Metode penulisan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif menggunakan pendekatan statutory approach dan conceptual approach. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif yakni pendekatan berdasarkan bahan hukum dengan cara menelaah konsep-konsep, teori-teori, asas-asas hukum dan peraturan perundang-undangan, serta literatur yang terkait dengan tulisan. Dalam tulisan ini ditemukan bahwa perubahan terjadi sejak akhir era orde lama yang menyeragamkan atau menghomogenisasi struktur pemerintahan daerah. Akibatnya banyak desa-desa adat yang berdiri sendiri tanpa masuk ke dalam struktur pemerintahan menurut undang-undang, sehingga masyarakat menjadi semakin etnosentris karena dianggap pembangunan yang dilakukan adalah berdasarkan stereotip jawanisasi.
WACANA PERADILAN ELEKTRONIK DALAM PROSES EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN DI LINGKUNGAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Muhammad Adiguna Bimasakti
Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/peratun.512022.19-38

Abstract

In the past, the litigation process in court was carried out manually from registration of cases to the reading of court’ decision. With the promulgation of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2019 concerning the Administration of Cases and Hearing in Electronic Courts (PERMA No. 1 of 2019), the paradigm regarding judiciary process has shifted towards electronic justice. In the sense that from registration of cases, the adjudication stage (trial in court) and the reading of court decisions is carried out electronically with the e-court application. However, this regulation did not reach the post-adjudication administrative process, at the stage of execution of the decision. For this reason, this paper was made to look at the potential for the implementation of administration of the execution of court decisions, especially in the administrative court, through the hierarchical execution process using the e-court application. The results of the study indicate that the administrative process of the execution of administrative court decisions can be carried out through the e-court application by changing the e-litigation paradigm, namely the change in PERMA no. 1 of 2019. The e-litigation paradigm in this regulation must also be expanded into e-judiciary (holistic electronic judiciary) so that the execution stage can be carried out electronically.
ASAS-ASAS HUKUM UTAMA DALAM HUKUM ACARA PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Spyendik Bernadus Blegur
Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/peratun.512022.39-56

Abstract

Three decades since the promulgation of Law no. 5 of 1986 concerning Administrative Court, developments in the procedural law of administrative courts are numerous and occur rapidly. However, with the rapid and many developments, there are still misunderstandings about the main principles of procedural law that apply in administrative courts. Therefore, this paper tries to re-explain the principles of procedural law in administrative courts. The writing method used in this research is a legal-normative approach using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This paper uses the legal-normative method, namely an approach based on legal materials by examining concepts, theories, legal principles and legislation, as well as literature related to the paper. It is found in this paper that the main legal principles in administrative court can be grouped into two, namely the principles related to formality and the principles related to the settlement of the dispute.
LANGKAH OPTIMALISASI PELAKSANAAN DISMISSAL PROSES DAN PEMERIKSAAN PERSIAPAN DI PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA MELALUI PERADILAN ELEKTRONIK Muhammad Amin Putra
Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/peratun.512022.57-74

Abstract

Since the promulgation of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2019 concerning the Administration of Cases and Litigation in Electronic Court (PERMA No. 1 of 2019), the administrative processes of cases and hearing in courts are carried out electronically. However, the PERMA did not accommodate the need for dispute examination in the administrative court, especially regarding the existence of the dismissal process and preparatory examination. Therefore, this paper is made to examine what steps are needed so that the dismissal process and preparatory examination can be carried out using the e-court application. This paper uses a legal-normative method, namely an approach based on legal materials in the form of laws and regulations, as well as literature related to the theme of this paper. This paper demonstrates that the dismissal process and preparatory examination can be carried out through a revision of PERMA no. 1 of 2019. In addition, further studies are needed regarding the specifics of the procedural law of the administrative court in the implementation of this e-litigation, due to the fact that the dismissal process and preparatory examination are part of the litigation process in the administrative court.
TANTANGAN DALAM PENANGANAN PERKARA TINDAKAN ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN DI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Hidayat Pratama Putra
Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol 5 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan bekerja sama dengan Ditjen Badimiltun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/peratun.512022.75-94

Abstract

After the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning government administration, there are basic things that have impacts on the authority of the administrative court, one of which is governmental real acts. This paper tries to analyze the potential problems that become challenges at the level of implementation of the settlement of cases of “government administrative actions” in the Administrative Court including misunderstanding of the concept of government administrative actions, the accountability regarding administrative tort due to government administrative actions, as well as compensation mechanisms for losses caused by it. Problems were analyzed based on normative legal research methods which were analyzed descriptively. The main challenge in the examination of government administrative actions is that there are many misperceptions about the concept of government administrative actions. Government administration actions are basically real act (Feitelijke handeling) and cannot be interpreted as government actions in a broad sense or known as bestuurshandelingen. Then the concept of accountability for administrative tort in the form of government administrative actions and compensation mechanisms for losses needs to be clarified through laws and regulations because currently there is no standard benchmark regarding the concept of accountability for an administrative tort in the form of government administrative actions, and its compensation mechanisms adequate to the damages for the losses.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2022 2022


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 6 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Hukum Peratun Vol. 6 No. 2 Vol 6 No 1 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019) Vol 1 No 2 (2018) Vol 1 No 1 (2018) More Issue