cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Angganararas Indriyosanti
Contact Email
angganararas.i@ugm.ac.id
Phone
+62274-563362
Journal Mail Official
gsr.fisipol@ugm.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Sosio Yustisia, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Kec. Depok, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Global South Review
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 26857782     EISSN : 26857790     DOI : https://doi.org/10.22146/globalsouth.50258
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Social,
Humanities Environmental Science Social Sciences Other
Global South Review is a social and political journal that aimed to provide academic and policy platform to exchange views, research findings, and dialogues within the Global South and between the Global North and the Global South. Global South Review examines all the issues encountered by Global South in the context of current international justice, security, and order. The journal focuses, but not exclusively, on the role of Global South in global politics; the rise, demise, and possible revival of South-South internationalism and Bandung Spirit; and the dynamics of relations between Global South and Global North. Authors may submit research articles and book reviews in related subjects.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 11 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 2 (2015)" : 11 Documents clear
The Cosmopolitanism of Y.B. Mangunwijaya Rizky Alif Alvian
Global South Review Vol 2, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/globalsouth.28864

Abstract

This paper aims to explain and analyze the idea of post-nationalism/post-Indonesia (pasca-nasionalisme/pasca-Indonesia) provided by Indonesian architect, clergy, social activist, and writer, Y.B. Mangunwijaya. Through his idea of post-nationalism, Mangunwijaya criticizes the Indonesian nationalism which tends to ask for an unconditional loyalty of the people to the state. This “shallow nationalism”, according to Mangunwijaya, is well expressed in the slogan of “right or wrong my country” (Mangunwijaya, 1999). Mangunwijaya further argues that the state should only be defended as long as the state defends “truth” since the purpose of human life is not to protect the state; but to defend truth and humanity. However, it is a mistake to understand Mangunwijaya simply as an anti-nationalist thinker. Instead, his idea of post-nationalism is rooted in his experience of third world nationalism, especially Indonesian nationalism. According to him, Indonesian nationalism did not emerge to resist the Dutch. It emerged to resist colonialism and its inhuman nature; and then attempted to restore human dignity. In other words, humanization is the essence of Indonesian nationalism (Mangunwijaya, 1995; 1999). This paper argues that Mangunwijaya reinterpretation of nationalism lays the foundation of his post-nationalism: post-nationalism is an effort to expand the essence of Indonesian nationalism to the world. Mangunwijaya directs Indonesian nationalism not only to humanize his polis, i.e. Indonesia, but also to humanize the cosmos, the world. This cosmopolitan aspect of Mangunwijaya post-nationalism is unique compared to that of Kantian or Levinasian-Derridean cosmopolitanism. Instead of placing nationalism as an obstacle to build a cosmopolitan world, Mangunwijaya places nationalism in the heart of his cosmopolitanism.
“Easternization” of Post-Western International Order: Appertaining Confucianism into Bandung Conference Legacy Dedi Dinarto
Global South Review Vol 2, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/globalsouth.28866

Abstract

This paper seeks to develop non-Western theory in IR, particularly appertaining Confucianism into the formation of new global order. Arguably, the role of China in international order has generated debates for IR theorists, which ended in two main conclusions, China as a new hegemonic power or responsible power. It is presumably caused by the diffusion of power in post-Cold War global order, in which China seeks for revival after the ‘century of humiliation’ caused by Western presence in early 20th century. Moreover, the model of China’s leadership under Xi Jinping in which global order is assumed to be related with the revival of Confucianism. Stressing on mutual cooperation, China seeks to shift the international paradigm disorder dominated by the western idea of materialism. Distinctively, this paper will illustrate the notion of Chinese role in the global order by taking its connection with the formation of Bandung Conference. As one of the global leading power, China could play greater role in international sphere, among other by uniting members of developing countries in the Bandung Conference to revivethe alternative way of global order management. Furthermore, the promotion of Chinese Dream as the manifestation of the essence of confucianism under Xi Jinping could become the starting point toward “easternization” of global order under Bandung Conference legacy.
The Long March from Bandung: The Ghost of the Bandung Spirit in Contemporary Relations between China and Africa Vera Leigh Fennel
Global South Review Vol 2, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/globalsouth.28867

Abstract

When Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡锦涛) gave the opening address at the Jakarta reception of the Asian-African Business Summit (亚非商业峰会) in 2005, he characterized contemporary relations between China and various African states thusly “[In] the world today, economic globalization is further developing…[this] presents Asian and African countries with rare opportunities as well as severe challenges…. [We] must…develop a new type of strategic partnership between Asia and Africa...to carry on the Bandung spirit and contribute to the continuous progress in Asia and Africa”. The importance of the Bandung Conference in the Cold War era is beyond debate; what has been debated is its lasting relevance. This paper examines the global economic rise of post-Cold War China and its “new strategic partnerships” (新型战略伙伴关系) with various African states and argues that the “partnerships”, which specifically promote pragmatic cooperation and mutual benefits between the two regions in trade, industry, investment, finance, embody the “Bandung Spirit” (万隆精神). It argues that what we are seeing now in China’s relationship with Africa is the culmination of a process begun by Premier Zhou Enlai (1898-1976) at the Bandung Conference of 1955.
The Philippine-US Relations: Living or Leaving the Bandung Spirit? Anna Rhodora Solar; John Matthew Poblete
Global South Review Vol 2, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/globalsouth.28868

Abstract

The Philippines had its own share of colonial past. Just as other Asian and African countries which were under the Western colonizers, the Philippines partook of the momentous event that proposed an alternative to the world order dominated by superpowers—the Bandung Conference. The principles collectively known as Bandung Spirit were embraced by the Philippines and had a clear understanding of its symbolic significance. Yet such understanding of these principles was coupled with compromises on the Philippines relations with the United States. Over the decades, the Philippines had to do a balancing act between its being sovereign, independent state and its recognition of the relevance of its past colonial master—the US. Hence, this raises the question of whether the Philippines is living or leaving the Bandung Spirit. Specifically, this paper assesses whether the Philippines still upholds the same Bandung Spirit in its traditional form or has it given a contemporary understanding of it. The paper argues that the Philippine-US relations remain to be an evident display of US presence in Southeast Asia albeit redefined to blend with the Bandung Spirit.
Mapping North-South Relations: The Case of Australia’s Regional Refugee Arrangements Dimas Fauzi; Yusnia Kurniasih
Global South Review Vol 2, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/globalsouth.28869

Abstract

In recent years, Australia has created some regional refugee arrangements with their neighbouring countries. Under the agreements with countries such as Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Malaysia and the most recent, Cambodia, Australia is committed to providing financial aid to run the supporting facilities and protect the asylum seekers who are relocated from their territory. These agreements then become questionable as the partner countries are developing countries which are relatively unstable in domestic politics and are not prosperous enough to bear the non-financial costs of refugee protection, such as integration and accountability issues. In this case, relations between Australia and their partner countries could be considered as an example of relations between the developed (north) and the developing countries (south). Thus, a question appears to be prominent: what do Australia refugee settlement agreements tell us about the relations between the (developed) north and the (developing) south? By employing structuralism model in international politics, we propose an argument that Australia’s refugee resettlement agreement can be understood as a form of responsibility sharing on refugee issue between the concerning countries in the region. The arrangements have not only produced positive results but also negative ones, such as conflicts. Additionally, this research will also take into account the existence of international law(s) governing refugee issues as the basis to analyse the refugee protection, mainly in Australia’s resettlement partner countries.
Conflict Over Natural Resources In The Global South : Conceptual Approaches Dewa Ayu Putu Eva Wishanti
Global South Review Vol 2, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/globalsouth.28871

Abstract

Dengan sifatnya yang konfliktual karena memiliki nilai ekonomi dan penguasaan teritori yang kompleks, pendalaman kajian soal sumber daya alam semestinya mendapat porsi ilmiah yang lebih besar. Lebih lagi, riset yang dibukukan, utamanya yang terkait dengan persoalan pengelolaan sumber daya alam di Indonesia masih kurang komprehensif. Berbagai opini yang vokal, utamanya dari organisasi masyarakat sipil, masih bernada reaktif dan tidak didukung penelitian dan pengelolaan data yang tertsruktur sebagai lawan dari narasi arus utama. Pun demikian dengan kajian akademik yang membahas perihal pengelolaan sumber daya alam. Kajian-kajian tersebut masih terkendala dengan akses data, akses keuangan, dan lembaga pendanaan penelitian pun masih kurang menyediakan alokasi bagi penelitian berbasis sumber daya alam di Indonesia, utamanya yang terkait bidang sosial-politik. Lebih luas lagi, dunia yang dibagi menjadi bagian utara dan selatan oleh beberapa organisasi internasional, misalnya United Nations Development Programmme (UNDP), pun memiliki sisi historis yang berbeda dalam menyikapi konflik-konflik sumber daya alamnya. Tidak dapat dipungkiri, di negara-negara selatan yang mayoritas masih berkembang, sumber daya alam masih menjadi sektor pemasok pendapatan negara yang paling utama.Untuk lebih mendapatkan gambaran tentang pendekatan-pendekatan konseptual yang mungkin dapat membantu memahami konflik, buku setebal 204 halaman ini menyajikan hasil-hasil penelitian tentang konflik sumber daya alam di negara-negara selatan. Pendekatan konseptual ini menjadi penting sebagai dasar memulai perdebatan, utamanya demi menyelami kondisi kekhususan yang bervariasi di tiap negara. Buku ini disusun oleh para akademisi dan peneliti Belanda yang bernaung di bawah The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, Science for Global Development Division (NWO/WOTRO) serta Kementerian Luar Negeri Kerajaan Belanda. Penyusunan buku ini juga berada di bawah Conflict and Cooperation over Natural Resources in Developing Countries (CoCooN Programme) yang menjalankan tujuh proyek penelitian dalam bidang konflik dan kerja sama terkait sumber daya alam. Hal ini tidak mengherankan mengingat Belanda memiliki tradisi keilmuan yang mengakar di bidang pengelolaan sumber daya alam dan Belanda juga merupakan asal muasal berbagai perusahaan multinasional terkemuka di bidang ekstraktif dan manufaktur.
Asia Rising: Who Is Leading? Jusmalia Oktaviani
Global South Review Vol 2, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/globalsouth.28872

Abstract

Pembelajar Ilmu Hubungan Internasional (HI) biasanya tidak akan asing dengan nama Amitav Acharya. Berasal dari India, Acharya merupakan salah satu akademisi HI non-western yang sudah banyak memberikan sumbangan bagi ilmu HI. Ia sudah menulis beberapa buku terutama yang berkaitan dengan Asia Tenggara. Acharya juga mengajar di berbagai perguruan tinggi di beberapa negara seperti Kanada (York University), Amerika Serikat (Harvard University dan American University), Australia (Sydney University), Singapura (National University of Singapore dan Nanyang Technological University), dan Inggris (University of Bristol).Buku terbitan tahun 2008 ini merupakan kumpulan artikel yang ditulis Acharya di berbagai koran. Artikel-artikel yang ditulis dalam rentang waktu 2002 hingga 2006 tersebut kemudian dikodifikasi menjadi buku. Setelah dibukukan, beberapa judul artikel pun ikut disesuaikan karena perbedaan konteks tulisan untuk surat kabar dan buku.
An IR for the Global South or a Global IR? (Guest Editorial) Amitav Acharya
Global South Review Vol 2, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/globalsouth.28874

Abstract

The field of international relations (IR) is witnessing growing efforts to challenge Western centrism and give more space and voice to the Global South. These efforts are happening under a variety of labels, such as, but not limited to, non-Western IR, post-Western IR, Global IR, etc.To be sure, attempts to “bring the Global South in” by highlighting and generalizing from its contexts and challenges are not new. One could think of several examples, with Dependency theory and, somewhat later, Postcolonialism being two of the most prominent approaches. But recent efforts have been broader and targeted the entire discipline of IR, especially its major theories and concepts. And they have brought in a wider range of theoretical perspectives than Marxism and Postcolonialism, including Constructivism (Acharya), English School (Buzan) and even some realists (e.g. Mohammed Ayoob’s Subaltern Realism”).But labels overlap and can be confusing. Does post-Western subsume or exclude pre-Western or premodern, or pre-Westphalian histories and institutions? Are the distinctions between West and non-West meaningful? (They are increasingly blurred, but alas, the major IR theories are yet to reflect this)  What is the difference between “non-Western” and “post-Western”?
Authors Profile Sukmawani Bela Pertiwi
Global South Review Vol 2, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/globalsouth.28876

Abstract

Authors Profile of IJIS
Front Matter IJIS Sukmawani Bela Pertiwi
Global South Review Vol 2, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/globalsouth.28877

Abstract

Front Matter of IJIS

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 11

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 7, No 2 (2025): Global South Review Vol 7, No 1 (2025): Global South Review Vol 6, No 2 (2024): Global South Review Vol 6, No 1 (2024): Global South Review Vol 5, No 2 (2023): Global South Review Vol 5, No 1 (2023): Global South Review Vol 4, No 2 (2022): Global South Review Vol 4, No 1 (2022): Global South Review Vol 3, No 1 (2021): Global South Review Vol 2, No 2 (2020): Global South Review Vol 2, No 1 (2020): Global South Review Vol 1, No 2 (2019): Global South Review Vol 1, No 1 (2019): Global South Review Vol 2, No 2 (2015) Vol 2, No 1 (2015) Vol 1, No 2 (2014) Vol 1, No 1 (2014) More Issue